Published in:
01-10-2020 | Original Article
Comparison of two dipyridamole infusion protocols for myocardial perfusion imaging in subjects with low likelihood of significant obstructive coronary artery disease
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 5/2020
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with positron emission tomography allows accurate measurements of myocardial blood flow (MBF). Stress MBF thresholds have been proposed to provide diagnostic and prognostic information in different pathology. Most studies relying on dipyridamole use a 5-minute infusion protocol, while current guidelines recommend a 4-minute infusion. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different dipyridamole infusion times on stress MBF.
Methods
The charts of 2,207 patients who underwent rubidium-82 MPI were retrospectively reviewed and 147 subjects with low likelihood of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) defined as calcium score = 0, body mass index < 45 kg·m−2, and summed stress score ≤ 3 were included. Of those, 65 were imaged with a 4-minute dipyridamole infusion (0.56 mg·kg−1) protocol and 82 with a 5-minute protocol (0.70 mg·kg−1).
Results
Stress MBF (3.23±0.76 vs 3.02±0.71 mL·min−1·g−1, P = 0.09), myocardial flow reserve (2.70±0.67 vs 2.85±0.74, P = 0.20), and coronary vascular resistance index (30±10 vs 31±9 mmHg × g × min·mL−1, P = 0.38) were not significantly different between the two protocols. The 5-minute protocol was associated with higher prevalence of symptoms (92.7% vs 81.5%, P = 0.04) and greater decrease in systolic blood pressure (− 9 vs − 6 mmHg, P = 0.03).
Conclusions
The 4-minute and 5-minute dipyridamole infusion protocols produce comparable myocardial flow response, hemodynamic changes, and symptoms, in subjects with low likelihood of significant obstructive CAD.