Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Commentary

Commentary regarding the inter-reader reproducibility of PI-RADS version 2

Authors: Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Daniel J. Margolis

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

For prostate MRI to achieve maximal clinical impact, consistency in radiological reporting is critical. Recognizing this need, the American College of Radiology, European Society of Uroradiology, and AdMeTech Foundation convened an international expert panel that developed the Prostate Imaging Radiology and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 2 (V2) to standardize prostate MRI interpretation and reporting [1]. PI-RADS V2 greatly expanded upon the earlier PI-RADS Version 1 released in 2012, seeking to be both more comprehensive and improve the system’s usability in clinical practice [2]. Since its public release in late 2015, PI-RADS V2 has been the subject of considerable interest by radiologists and urologists, undergoing increasing clinical adoption and being the subject of educational courses and a number of peer-reviewed publications [35]. As PI-RADS V2 grows in popularity, a natural and important question is just how successful the system has been in achieving its intended aim of standardizing prostate MRI interpretation. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40CrossRefPubMed Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 277:142818CrossRef Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 277:142818CrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Vargas HA, Hotker AM, Goldman DA, et al. (2015) Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4015-6 Vargas HA, Hotker AM, Goldman DA, et al. (2015) Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-015-4015-6
6.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D, et al. (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 Lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152542 Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D, et al. (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 Lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2016152542
7.
go back to reference Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric mr imaging. Radiology 277(3):741–750CrossRefPubMed Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric mr imaging. Radiology 277(3):741–750CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP, et al. (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269(2):482–492CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP, et al. (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269(2):482–492CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Marks LS (2016) Some prostate cancers are invisible to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Br J Urol (in press) Marks LS (2016) Some prostate cancers are invisible to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Br J Urol (in press)
10.
go back to reference Kasel-Seibert M, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R, et al. (2016) Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 85(4):726–731CrossRefPubMed Kasel-Seibert M, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R, et al. (2016) Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 85(4):726–731CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43(6):543–549CrossRefPubMed Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43(6):543–549CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lantz CA, Nebenzahl E (1996) Behavior and interpretation of the kappa statistic: resolution of the two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 49(4):431–434CrossRefPubMed Lantz CA, Nebenzahl E (1996) Behavior and interpretation of the kappa statistic: resolution of the two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 49(4):431–434CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, et al. (2002) Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 224(3):871–880CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, et al. (2002) Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 224(3):871–880CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E (2009) Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology 252(3):665–672CrossRefPubMed Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E (2009) Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology 252(3):665–672CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, et al. (1997) CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):813–818CrossRefPubMed Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, et al. (1997) CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):813–818CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Karmazyn B, Tawadros A, Delaney LR, et al. (2015) Ultrasound classification of solitary renal cysts in children. J Pediatr Urol 11(3):149 e141–149 e146CrossRef Karmazyn B, Tawadros A, Delaney LR, et al. (2015) Ultrasound classification of solitary renal cysts in children. J Pediatr Urol 11(3):149 e141–149 e146CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Oto A, Turkbey B, Westphalen AC (2016) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look. AJR Am J Roentgenol. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15765 Rosenkrantz AB, Oto A, Turkbey B, Westphalen AC (2016) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look. AJR Am J Roentgenol. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​15.​15765
19.
go back to reference Puech P, Randazzo M, Ouzzane A, et al. (2015) How are we going to train a generation of radiologists (and urologists) to read prostate MRI? Curr Opin Urol 25(6):522–535CrossRefPubMed Puech P, Randazzo M, Ouzzane A, et al. (2015) How are we going to train a generation of radiologists (and urologists) to read prostate MRI? Curr Opin Urol 25(6):522–535CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Litjens GJ, Barentsz JO, Karssemeijer N, Huisman HJ (2015) Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for determining cancer aggressiveness in prostate MRI. Eur Radiol 25(11):3187–3199CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Litjens GJ, Barentsz JO, Karssemeijer N, Huisman HJ (2015) Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for determining cancer aggressiveness in prostate MRI. Eur Radiol 25(11):3187–3199CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Niaf E, Lartizien C, Bratan F, et al. (2014) Prostate focal peripheral zone lesions: characterization at multiparametric MR imaging–influence of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Radiology 271(3):761–769CrossRefPubMed Niaf E, Lartizien C, Bratan F, et al. (2014) Prostate focal peripheral zone lesions: characterization at multiparametric MR imaging–influence of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Radiology 271(3):761–769CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Commentary regarding the inter-reader reproducibility of PI-RADS version 2
Authors
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
Daniel J. Margolis
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0756-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Abdominal Radiology 5/2016 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “gallbladder pearl necklace” sign

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.