Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Gastroenterology
Published in: BMC Gastroenterology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Colorectal Cancer | Research article

Repeatability of radiomics studies in colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Authors: Ying Liu, Xiaoqin Wei, Xu Feng, Yan Liu, Guiling Feng, Yong Du

Published in: BMC Gastroenterology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recently, radiomics has been widely used in colorectal cancer, but many variable factors affect the repeatability of radiomics research. This review aims to analyze the repeatability of radiomics studies in colorectal cancer and to evaluate the current status of radiomics in the field of colorectal cancer.

Methods

The included studies in this review by searching from the PubMed and Embase databases. Then each study in our review was evaluated using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). We analyzed the factors that may affect the repeatability in the radiomics workflow and discussed the repeatability of the included studies.

Results

A total of 188 studies was included in this review, of which only two (2/188, 1.06%) studies controlled the influence of individual factors. In addition, the median score of RQS was 11 (out of 36), range-1 to 27.

Conclusions

The RQS score was moderately low, and most studies did not consider the repeatability of radiomics features, especially in terms of Intra-individual, scanners, and scanning parameters. To improve the generalization of the radiomics model, it is necessary to further control the variable factors of repeatability.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249
2.
Staal FCR, van der Reijd DJ, Taghavi M, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Maas M. Radiomics for the Prediction of Treatment Outcome and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021;20(1):52–71.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Limkin EJ, Sun R, Dercle L, Zacharaki EI, Robert C, Reuzé S, Schernberg A, Paragios N, Deutsch E, Ferté C. Promises and challenges for the implementation of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in oncology. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(6):1191–206.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, De Jong EEC, Van Timmeren J, Sanduleanu S, Larue RTHM, Even AJG, Jochems A, et al. Radiomics: The bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(12):749–62.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Forghani R, Savadjiev P, Chatterjee A, Muthukrishnan N, Reinhold C, Forghani B. Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Biomarker and Prediction Model Development in Oncology. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019;17:995–1008.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
7.
8.
Xue C, Yuan J, Lo GG, Chang ATY, Poon DMC, Wong OL, Zhou Y, Chu WCW. Radiomics feature reliability assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient: a systematic review. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11(10):4431–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Mackin D, Fave X, Zhang L, Fried D, Yang J, Taylor B, Rodriguez-Rivera E, Dodge C, Jones AK, Court L. Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(11):757–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, Forster K, Aerts HJ, Dekker A, Fenstermacher D, et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1234–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Berenguer R, Pastor-Juan MDR, Canales-Vázquez J, Castro-García M, Villas MV, Mansilla Legorburo F, Sabater S. Radiomics of CT Features May Be Nonreproducible and Redundant: Influence of CT Acquisition Parameters. Radiology. 2018;288(2):407–15.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Mackin D, Fave X, Zhang L, Yang J, Jones AK, Ng CS, Court L. Harmonizing the pixel size in retrospective computed tomography radiomics studies. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0178524.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Shafiq-Ul-Hassan M, Zhang GG, Latifi K, Ullah G, Hunt DC, Balagurunathan Y, Abdalah MA, Schabath MB, Goldgof DG, Mackin D, et al. Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels. Med Phys. 2017;44(3):1050–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Lu L, Ehmke RC, Schwartz LH, Zhao B. Assessing Agreement between Radiomic Features Computed for Multiple CT Imaging Settings. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0166550.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
He L, Huang Y, Ma Z, Liang C, Liang C, Liu Z. Effects of contrast-enhancement, reconstruction slice thickness and convolution kernel on the diagnostic performance of radiomics signature in solitary pulmonary nodule. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34921.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Kim H, Park CM, Lee M, Park SJ, Song YS, Lee JH, Hwang EJ, Goo JM. Impact of Reconstruction Algorithms on CT Radiomic Features of Pulmonary Tumors: Analysis of Intra- and Inter-Reader Variability and Inter-Reconstruction Algorithm Variability. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164924.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Traverso A, Kazmierski M, Shi Z, Kalendralis P, Welch M, Nissen HD, Jaffray D, Dekker A, Wee L. Stability of radiomic features of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for locally advanced rectal cancer in response to image pre-processing. Phys Med. 2019;61:44–51.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Li Y, Han G, Wu X, Li Z, Zhao K, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Liang C: Normalization of multicenter CT radiomics by a generative adversarial network method. Phys Med Biol. 2021;(5):66.
19.
van Heeswijk MM, Lambregts DM, van Griethuysen JJ, Oei S, Rao SX, de Graaff CA, Vliegen RF, Beets GL, Papanikolaou N, Beets-Tan RG. Automated and Semiautomated Segmentation of Rectal Tumor Volumes on Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Can It Replace Manual Volumetry? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94(4):824–31.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Parmar C, Rios Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Jermoumi M, Carvalho S, Mak RH, Mitra S, Shankar BU, Kikinis R, Haibe-Kains B, et al. Robust Radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102107.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Day E, Betler J, Parda D, Reitz B, Kirichenko A, Mohammadi S, Miften M. A region growing method for tumor volume segmentation on PET images for rectal and anal cancer patients. Med Phys. 2009;36(10):4349–58.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Trebeschi S, van Griethuysen JJM, Lambregts DMJ, Lahaye MJ, Parmar C, Bakers FCH, Peters N, Beets-Tan RGH, Aerts H. Deep Learning for Fully-Automated Localization and Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on Multiparametric MR. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
24.
McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM. Group atP-D: Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018;319(4):388–96.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Chetan MR, Gleeson FV. Radiomics in predicting treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer: current status, challenges and future perspectives. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(2):1049–58.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(3):411–21.PubMed
27.
Lovinfosse P, Polus M, Van Daele D, Martinive P, Daenen F, Hatt M, Visvikis D, Koopmansch B, Lambert F, Coimbra C, et al. FDG PET/CT radiomics for predicting the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(3):365–75.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Ma X, Shen F, Jia Y, Xia Y, Li Q, Lu J. MRI-based radiomics of rectal cancer: preoperative assessment of the pathological features. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;19(1):86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Wang J, Shen L, Zhong H, Zhou Z, Hu P, Gan J, Luo R, Hu W, Zhang Z. Radiomics features on radiotherapy treatment planning CT can predict patient survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15346.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Nie K, Shi L, Chen Q, Hu X, Jabbour SK, Yue N, Niu T, Sun X. Rectal Cancer: Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Outcome based on Radiomics of Multiparametric MRI. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(21):5256–64.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Kang J, Lee JH, Lee HS, Cho ES, Park EJ, Baik SH, Lee KY, Park C, Yeu Y, Clemenceau JR, et al. Radiomics features of18f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography as a novel prognostic signature in colorectal cancer. Cancers. 2021;13(3):1–17.CrossRef
32.
Rios Velazquez E, Aerts HJ, Gu Y, Goldgof DB, De Ruysscher D, Dekker A, Korn R, Gillies RJ, Lambin P. A semiautomatic CT-based ensemble segmentation of lung tumors: comparison with oncologists’ delineations and with the surgical specimen. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105(2):167–73.PubMedCrossRef
33.
van Dam IE. van Sörnsen de Koste JR, Hanna GG, Muirhead R, Slotman BJ, Senan S: Improving target delineation on 4-dimensional CT scans in stage I NSCLC using a deformable registration tool. Radiother Oncol. 2010;96(1):67–72.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Heye T, Merkle EM, Reiner CS, Davenport MS, Horvath JJ, Feuerlein S, Breault SR, Gall P, Bashir MR, Dale BM, et al. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part II. Comparison of intra- and interobserver variability with manual region of interest placement versus semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis. Radiology. 2013;266(3):812–21.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Egger J, Kapur T, Fedorov A, Pieper S, Miller JV, Veeraraghavan H, Freisleben B, Golby AJ, Nimsky C, Kikinis R. GBM volumetry using the 3D Slicer medical image computing platform. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1364.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Tibermacine H, Rouanet P, Sbarra M, Forghani R, Reinhold C, Nougaret S. Radiomics modelling in rectal cancer to predict disease-free survival: evaluation of different approaches. Br J Surg. 2021;108(10):1243–50.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures. They Are Data Radiology. 2016;278(2):563–77.PubMed
38.
Clarke LP, Nordstrom RJ, Zhang H, Tandon P, Zhang Y, Redmond G, Farahani K, Kelloff G, Henderson L, Shankar L, et al. The Quantitative Imaging Network: NCI’s Historical Perspective and Planned Goals. Transl Oncol. 2014;7(1):1–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Fotina I, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Stock M, Pötter R, Georg D. Critical discussion of evaluation parameters for inter-observer variability in target definition for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012;188(2):160–7.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Nakanishi R, Akiyoshi T, Toda S, Murakami Y, Taguchi S, Oba K, Hanaoka Y, Nagasaki T, Yamaguchi T, Konishi T, et al. Radiomics Approach Outperforms Diameter Criteria for Predicting Pathological Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis After Neoadjuvant (Chemo)Radiotherapy in Advanced Low Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(11):4273–83.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Avanzo M, Stancanello J, El Naqa I. Beyond imaging: The promise of radiomics. Phys Med. 2017;38:122–39.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Chalkidou A, O’Doherty MJ, Marsden PK. False Discovery Rates in PET and CT Studies with Texture Features: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0124165.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Guyon IM, Andr, Elisseeff. An introduction to variable and feature selection [J]. J Mach Learn Res. 2003.
44.
Boldrini L, Cusumano D, Chiloiro G, Casà C, Masciocchi C, Lenkowicz J, Cellini F, Dinapoli N, Azario L, Teodoli S, et al. Delta radiomics for rectal cancer response prediction with hybrid 0.35 T magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT): a hypothesis-generating study for an innovative personalized medicine approach. Radiol Med. 2019;124(2):145–53.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Cusumano D, Boldrini L, Yadav P, Yu G, Musurunu B, Chiloiro G, Piras A, Lenkowicz J, Placidi L, Romano A, et al. Delta radiomics for rectal cancer response prediction using low field magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy: an external validation. Physica Med. 2021;84:186–91.CrossRef
46.
Hotta M, Minamimoto R, Gohda Y, Miwa K, Otani K, Kiyomatsu T, Yano H. Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT with texture analysis in patients with rectal cancer treated by surgery. Ann Nucl Med. 2021;35(7):843–52.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Negreros-Osuna AA, Parakh A, Corcoran RB, Pourvaziri A, Kambadakone A, Ryan DP, Sahani DV. Radiomics Texture Features in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Correlation with BRAF Mutation and 5-year Overall Survival. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020;2(5):e190084.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Liu Z, Meng X, Zhang H, Li Z, Liu J, Sun K, Meng Y, Dai W, Xie P, Ding Y, et al. Predicting distant metastasis and chemotherapy benefit in locally advanced rectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4308.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Shayesteh SP, Alikhassi A, Fard Esfahani A, Miraie M, Geramifar P, Bitarafan-Rajabi A, Haddad P. Neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy response prediction using MRI based ensemble learning method in rectal cancer patients. Phys Med. 2019;62:111–9.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zhang Z, Jiang X, Zhang R, Yu T, Liu S, Luo Y. Radiomics signature as a new biomarker for preoperative prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol (Ankara, Turkey). 2021;27(3):308–14.CrossRef
51.
52.
Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, Aerts H, Andrearczyk V, Apte A, Ashrafinia S, Bakas S, Beukinga RJ, Boellaard R, et al. The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. Radiol. 2020;295(2):328–38.CrossRef
53.
Buckler AJ, Bresolin L, Dunnick NR, Sullivan DC. A collaborative enterprise for multi-stakeholder participation in the advancement of quantitative imaging. Radiol. 2011;258(3):906–14.CrossRef
54.
van Timmeren JE, Leijenaar RTH, van Elmpt W, Wang J, Zhang Z, Dekker A, Lambin P. Test-Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? Tomogr. 2016;2(4):361–5.CrossRef
55.
Balagurunathan Y, Kumar V, Gu Y, Kim J, Wang H, Liu Y, Goldgof DB, Hall LO, Korn R, Zhao B, et al. Test-retest reproducibility analysis of lung CT image features. J Digit Imaging. 2014;27(6):805–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Zhao B, Tan Y, Tsai WY, Qi J, Xie C, Lu L, Schwartz LH. Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23428.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Shafiq-Ul-Hassan M, Latifi K, Zhang G, Ullah G, Gillies R, Moros E. Voxel size and gray level normalization of CT radiomic features in lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10545.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Agolli L, Pilz K, Troost EGC, Richter C, Löck S. Assessing robustness of radiomic features by image perturbation. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):614.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
Lazar C, Meganck S, Taminau J, Steenhoff D, Coletta A, Molter C, Weiss-Solís DY, Duque R, Bersini H, Nowé A. Batch effect removal methods for microarray gene expression data integration: a survey. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14(4):469–90.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostat. 2007;8(1):118–27.CrossRef
61.
Orlhac F, Boughdad S, Philippe C, Stalla-Bourdillon H, Nioche C, Champion L, Soussan M, Frouin F, Frouin V, Buvat I. A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(8):1321–8.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Orlhac F, Frouin F, Nioche C, Ayache N, Buvat I. Validation of A Method to Compensate Multicenter Effects Affecting CT Radiomics. Radiol. 2019;291(1):53–9.CrossRef
63.
Fortin JP, Cullen N, Sheline YI, Taylor WD, Aselcioglu I, Cook PA, Adams P, Cooper C, Fava M, McGrath PJ, et al. Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites. Neuroimage. 2018;167:104–20.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Ibrahim A, Primakov S, Beuque M, Woodruff HC, Halilaj I, Wu G, Refaee T, Granzier R, Widaatalla Y, Hustinx R, et al. Radiomics for precision medicine: Current challenges, future prospects, and the proposal of a new framework. Methods. 2021;188:20–9.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Wesdorp NJ, Hellingman T, Jansma EP, van Waesberghe JTM, Boellaard R, Punt CJA, Huiskens J, Kazemier G. Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of radiomics predicting response to treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(6):1785–94.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Ligero M, Jordi-Ollero O, Bernatowicz K, Garcia-Ruiz A, Delgado-Muñoz E, Leiva D, Mast R, Suarez C, Sala-Llonch R, Calvo N, et al. Minimizing acquisition-related radiomics variability by image resampling and batch effect correction to allow for large-scale data analysis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(3):1460–70.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Peerlings J, Woodruff HC, Winfield JM, Ibrahim A, Van Beers BE, Heerschap A, Jackson A, Wildberger JE, Mottaghy FM, DeSouza NM, et al. Stability of radiomics features in apparent diffusion coefficient maps from a multi-centre test-retest trial. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4800.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Taghavi M, Trebeschi S, Simões R, Meek DB, Beckers RCJ, Lambregts DMJ, Verhoef C, Houwers JB, van der Heide UA, Beets-Tan RGH, et al. Machine learning-based analysis of CT radiomics model for prediction of colorectal metachronous liver metastases. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(1):249–56.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Harrell F E . Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis[M]. Springer, 2010.
70.
Yang C, Jiang ZK, Liu LH, Zeng MS. Pre-treatment ADC image-based random forest classifier for identifying resistant rectal adenocarcinoma to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(1):101–7.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Sollini M, Antunovic L, Chiti A, Kirienko M. Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(13):2656–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
Moreira JM, Santiago I, Santinha J, Figueiredo N, Marias K, Figueiredo M, Vanneschi L, Papanikolaou N. Challenges and Promises of Radiomics for Rectal Cancer. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2019;15(6):175–80.CrossRef
73.
Hennessy M, Milner R. Algebraic laws for nondeterminism and concurrency. J ACM. 1985;32(1):137–61.CrossRef
74.
Brunese L, Mercaldo F, Reginelli A, Santone A. Prostate Gleason Score Detection and Cancer Treatment Through Real-Time Formal Verification. IEEE Access. 2019;7:186236–46.CrossRef
75.
Rocca A, Brunese MC, Santone A, Avella P, Bianco P, Scacchi A, Scaglione M, Bellifemine F, Danzi R, Varriano G et al: Early Diagnosis of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer through CT Radiomics and Formal Methods: A Pilot Study. J Clin Med. 2021;11(1):31.
76.
Santone A, Brunese MC, Donnarumma F, Guerriero P, Mercaldo F, Reginelli A, Miele V, Giovagnoni A, Brunese L. Radiomic features for prostate cancer grade detection through formal verification. Radiol Med. 2021;126(5):688–97.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Santone A, Belfiore MP, Mercaldo F, Varriano G, Brunese L: On the Adoption of Radiomics and Formal Methods for COVID-19 Coronavirus Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(2):293.
78.
Brunese L, Mercaldo F, Reginelli A, Santone A. Formal methods for prostate cancer Gleason score and treatment prediction using radiomic biomarkers. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;66:165–75.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Brunese L, Mercaldo F, Reginelli A, Santone A: Radiomics for Gleason Score Detection through Deep Learning. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(18):5411.
80.
Wu X, Li Y, Chen X, Huang Y, He L, Zhao K, Huang X, Zhang W, Huang Y, Li Y, et al. Deep Learning Features Improve the Performance of a Radiomics Signature for Predicting KRAS Status in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(11):e254–62.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Yang L, Dong D, Fang M, Zhu Y, Zang Y, Liu Z, Zhang H, Ying J, Zhao X, Tian J. Can CT-based radiomics signature predict KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer? Eur Radiol. 2018;28(5):2058–67.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Li Y, Eresen A, Shangguan J, Yang J, Benson AB 3rd, Yaghmai V, Zhang Z. Preoperative prediction of perineural invasion and KRAS mutation in colon cancer using machine learning. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020;146(12):3165–74.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Oh JE, Kim MJ, Lee J, Hur BY, Kim B, Kim DY, Baek JY, Chang HJ, Park SC, Oh JH, et al. Magnetic Resonance-Based Texture Analysis Differentiating KRAS Mutation Status in Rectal Cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(1):51–9.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Cui Y, Liu H, Ren J, Du X, Xin L, Li D, Yang X, Wang D. Development and validation of a MRI-based radiomics signature for prediction of KRAS mutation in rectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(4):1948–58.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Horvat N, Veeraraghavan H, Pelossof RA, Fernandes MC, Arora A, Khan M, Marco M, Cheng CT, Gonen M, Golia Pernicka JS, et al. Radiogenomics of rectal adenocarcinoma in the era of precision medicine: A pilot study of associations between qualitative and quantitative MRI imaging features and genetic mutations. Eur J Radiol. 2019;113:174–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
Shi R, Chen W, Yang B, Qu J, Cheng Y, Zhu Z, Gao Y, Wang Q, Liu Y, Li Z, et al. Prediction of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis using a deep artificial neural network based on radiomics and semantic features. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(12):4513–26.PubMedPubMedCentral
87.
Neri E, Del Re M, Paiar F, Erba P, Cocuzza P, Regge D, Danesi R. Radiomics and liquid biopsy in oncology: the holons of systems medicine. Insights Imaging. 2018;9(6):915–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
88.
Metadata
Title
Repeatability of radiomics studies in colorectal cancer: a systematic review
Authors
Ying Liu
Xiaoqin Wei
Xu Feng
Yan Liu
Guiling Feng
Yong Du
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-230X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02743-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Gastroenterology 1/2023 Go to the issue

Research article

Determining the survival benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with pT1-3N1M0 rectal cancer undergoing total mesorectal excision: a retrospective analysis

Research

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus entecavir in the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure with hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research

Short and long-term follow-up and clinical outcomes in patients with celiac disease in a large private practice setting

Correction

Correction: The insoluble excretion of multi-matrix system mesalazine preparations in patients with ulcerative colitis

Research

Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in patients with intestinal Behçet’s disease: a real-world prospective observational study in South Korea

Research

Establishing minimal clinically important differences for the Quality of Life Instrument of Chronic Gastritis QLICD-CG(V2.0) based on distribution-based methods
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits