Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2024

01-12-2024 | Colorectal Cancer | RESEARCH

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the New Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire

Authors: Ibrahim H. Ozata, Tutku Tufekci, Salih Nafiz Karahan, Serkan Sucu, Dilara Yigit, Emre Ozoran, Oyku Ozturk, Mert Veznikli, Arzu Baygul, Ahmet Onur Demirel, Ahmet Can Koyuncuoglu, Kutay Demirkir, Yasemin Yildirim, Meryem Tuncak, Mehmet Ali Koc, Tayfun Bisgin, Ramazan Kozan, Cemil Burak Kulle, Ismail Cem Eray, Cihangir Akyol, Metin Keskin, Selman Sokmen, Sezai Leventoglu, Ahmet Rencuzogullari, Ayise Karadag, Dursun Bugra, Emre Balik

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to adapt and validate the Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (CCF-CaQL) in Turkish, addressing the significant need for reliable, language-specific QoL measures for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Turkiye. This effort fills a critical gap in CRC patient care, enhancing both patient-provider communication and disease-specific QoL assessment.

Methods

The CCF-CaQL was translated into Turkish, verified for accuracy, and reviewed for clarity and relevance. Eligible patients who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer between July 2021 and July 2022 from six hospitals completed the CCF-CaQL and SF-36 questionnaires. For analysis, confirmatory factor analysis using Smart PLS 4 and descriptive statistics were employed. The questionnaire’s reliability and validity were assessed using Cronbach alpha, composite reliability, and the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio, along with multicollinearity checks and factor loadings. Nonparametric resampling was used for precise error and confidence interval calculations, and the Spearman coefficient and split-half method were applied for reliability testing.

Results

In the study involving 244 colorectal cancer patients, confirmatory factor analysis of the CCF-CaQL indicated effective item performance, with one item removed due to lower factor loading. The questionnaire exhibited high internal consistency, evidenced by a Cronbach alpha value of 0.909. Convergent validity was strong, with all average variance extracted (AVE) values exceeding 0.4. Discriminant validity was confirmed with HTMT coefficients below 0.9, and no significant multicollinearity issues were observed (VIF values < 10). Parallel testing with the SF-36 scale demonstrated moderate to very strong correlations, affirming the CCF-CaQL’s comparability in measuring quality of life.

Conclusion

The Turkish version of the CCF-CaQL was validated for assessing quality of life in colorectal cancer patients. This validation confirms its reliability and cultural appropriateness for use in Turkiye. The disease-specific nature of the CCF-CaQL makes it a useful tool in clinical and research settings, enhancing patient care by accurately monitoring treatment effects and interventions in the Turkish colorectal cancer patient population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sung H et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of ıncidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249CrossRefPubMed Sung H et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of ıncidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ferlay J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49(6):1374–1403CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49(6):1374–1403CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Braun DP et al (2011) Can changes in health related quality of life scores predict survival in stages III and IV colorectal cancer? Health Qual Life Outcomes 9:62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Braun DP et al (2011) Can changes in health related quality of life scores predict survival in stages III and IV colorectal cancer? Health Qual Life Outcomes 9:62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Lee L et al (2015) How well are we measuring postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery? Qual Life Res 24(11):2583–2590CrossRefPubMed Lee L et al (2015) How well are we measuring postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery? Qual Life Res 24(11):2583–2590CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pezold ML et al (2016) Defining a research agenda for patient-reported outcomes in surgery: using a Delphi survey of stakeholders. JAMA Surg 151(10):930–936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pezold ML et al (2016) Defining a research agenda for patient-reported outcomes in surgery: using a Delphi survey of stakeholders. JAMA Surg 151(10):930–936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Aaronson NK et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376CrossRefPubMed Aaronson NK et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ganesh V et al (2016) Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer: a literature review. Support Care Cancer 24(8):3661–3668CrossRefPubMed Ganesh V et al (2016) Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer: a literature review. Support Care Cancer 24(8):3661–3668CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK (1999) The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 35(2):238–47 Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK (1999) The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 35(2):238–47
11.
go back to reference Whistance RN et al (2009) Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45(17):3017–3026CrossRefPubMed Whistance RN et al (2009) Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45(17):3017–3026CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yoo HJ et al (2005) Quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with colectomy and the validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C), Version 4. J Pain Symptom Manage 30(1):24–32CrossRefPubMed Yoo HJ et al (2005) Quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with colectomy and the validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C), Version 4. J Pain Symptom Manage 30(1):24–32CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr (1999) SF-36 Health Survey. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US, pp 1227–1246 Ware JE Jr (1999) SF-36 Health Survey. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US, pp 1227–1246
14.
go back to reference Zutshi M et al (2020) Reducing patient burden and ımproving data quality with the new Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Dis Colon Rectum 63(4):469–487CrossRefPubMed Zutshi M et al (2020) Reducing patient burden and ımproving data quality with the new Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Dis Colon Rectum 63(4):469–487CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Akduran F, Durna Z (2021) Turkish validation and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life scale for colorectal cancer. Turk J Gastroenterol 32(4):357–364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Akduran F, Durna Z (2021) Turkish validation and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life scale for colorectal cancer. Turk J Gastroenterol 32(4):357–364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Kaya BB, ICAGASIOGLU A (2018) Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short form 36 (SF-36) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Surg Med 2(1):11–16 Kaya BB, ICAGASIOGLU A (2018) Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short form 36 (SF-36) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Surg Med 2(1):11–16
17.
go back to reference Kocyigit H et al (1999) Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Short form 36: A study of a patients with romatoid disorder. Drug Therapy 12:102–106 Kocyigit H et al (1999) Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Short form 36: A study of a patients with romatoid disorder. Drug Therapy 12:102–106
18.
go back to reference Hair FJ Jr et al (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European business review. 26(2):106–121 Hair FJ Jr et al (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European business review. 26(2):106–121
19.
go back to reference George D, Mallery P (2003) SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 11.0 Update. Allyn and Bacon George D, Mallery P (2003) SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 11.0 Update. Allyn and Bacon
20.
go back to reference Hair JF (2009) Multivariate data analysis Hair JF (2009) Multivariate data analysis
21.
go back to reference Taber KS (2018) The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research ınstruments in science education. Res Sci Educ 48(6):1273–1296CrossRef Taber KS (2018) The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research ınstruments in science education. Res Sci Educ 48(6):1273–1296CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hair FJ Jr et al (2021) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications Hair FJ Jr et al (2021)  A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications
23.
go back to reference Vittinghoff E et al (2006) Regression methods in biostatistics: linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models Vittinghoff E et al (2006) Regression methods in biostatistics: linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models
24.
go back to reference Harrington D (2009) Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press, USA Harrington D (2009) Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press, USA
25.
go back to reference Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43:115–135CrossRef Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43:115–135CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Dancey CP, Reidy J (2007) Statistics without maths for psychology. Pearson education Dancey CP, Reidy J (2007) Statistics without maths for psychologyPearson education
27.
go back to reference Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W (2011) Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 17(2):268–274CrossRefPubMed Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W (2011) Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 17(2):268–274CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Celasin H et al (2023) Validation of the Turkish translation of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Tech Coloproctol 27(6):465–474CrossRefPubMed Celasin H et al (2023) Validation of the Turkish translation of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Tech Coloproctol 27(6):465–474CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the New Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire
Authors
Ibrahim H. Ozata
Tutku Tufekci
Salih Nafiz Karahan
Serkan Sucu
Dilara Yigit
Emre Ozoran
Oyku Ozturk
Mert Veznikli
Arzu Baygul
Ahmet Onur Demirel
Ahmet Can Koyuncuoglu
Kutay Demirkir
Yasemin Yildirim
Meryem Tuncak
Mehmet Ali Koc
Tayfun Bisgin
Ramazan Kozan
Cemil Burak Kulle
Ismail Cem Eray
Cihangir Akyol
Metin Keskin
Selman Sokmen
Sezai Leventoglu
Ahmet Rencuzogullari
Ayise Karadag
Dursun Bugra
Emre Balik
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04572-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2024 Go to the issue