Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Gastroenterology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Colonoscopy | Research

Effectiveness of switching endoscopists for repeat surveillance colonoscopy: a retrospective study

Authors: Naoya Okada, Jun Arimoto, Takanori Nishiguchi, Mikio Kobayashi, Toshihiro Niikura, Hiroki Kuwabara, Michiko Nakaoka, Atsushi Nakajima, Hideyuki Chiba

Published in: BMC Gastroenterology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surveillance colonoscopy decreases colorectal cancer mortality; however, lesions are occasionally missed. Although an appropriate surveillance interval is indicated, variations may occur in the methods used, such as scope manipulation or observation. Therefore, individual endoscopists may miss certain areas. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness of performing repeat colonoscopies with a different endoscopist from the initial procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 8093 consecutive colonoscopies performed in the Omori Red Cross Hospital from January 1st 2018 to June 30th 2021. Data from repeat total colonoscopies performed within three months were collected to assess missed lesions. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether the two examinations were performed by different endoscopists (group D) or the same endoscopist (group S). The primary outcome in both groups was the missed lesion detection rate (MLDR).

Results

Overall, 205 eligible patients were analyzed. In total, 102 and 103 patients were enrolled in groups D and S, respectively. The MLDR was significantly higher in group D (61.8% vs. 31.1%, P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the detection of missed lesions identified performance by the different endoscopists (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.81–6.30), and sufficient withdrawal time (> 6 min) (odds ratio, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.12–8.61) as significant variables.

Conclusions

Overall, our study showed a significant improvement in the detection of missed lesions when performed by different endoscopists. When performing repeat colonoscopy, it is desirable that a different endoscopist perform the second colonoscopy.

Trial registration

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Omori Red Cross Hospital on November 28, 2022 (approval number:22–43).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:109–49.CrossRef Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:109–49.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Saito Y, Oka S, Kawamura T, et al. Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Endosc. 2021;33:486–519.CrossRefPubMed Saito Y, Oka S, Kawamura T, et al. Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Endosc. 2021;33:486–519.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Aniwan S, Orkoonsawat P, Viriyautsahakul V, et al. The secondary quality indicator to improve prediction of adenoma miss rate apart from adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:723–9.CrossRefPubMed Aniwan S, Orkoonsawat P, Viriyautsahakul V, et al. The secondary quality indicator to improve prediction of adenoma miss rate apart from adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:723–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–50.CrossRefPubMed van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–50.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, et al. Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1661–74.CrossRefPubMed Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, et al. Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1661–74.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:858–64.CrossRefPubMed Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:858–64.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Paggi S, Radaelli F, Senore C, et al. Linked-color imaging versus white-light colonoscopy in an organized colorectal cancer screening program. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:723–30.CrossRefPubMed Paggi S, Radaelli F, Senore C, et al. Linked-color imaging versus white-light colonoscopy in an organized colorectal cancer screening program. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:723–30.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wang P, Liu P, Glissen Brown JR, et al. Lower adenoma miss rate of computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy vs routine white-light colonoscopy in a prospective tandem study. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:1252–61.CrossRefPubMed Wang P, Liu P, Glissen Brown JR, et al. Lower adenoma miss rate of computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy vs routine white-light colonoscopy in a prospective tandem study. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:1252–61.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wang CL, Huang ZP, Chen K, et al. Adenoma miss rate determined by very shortly repeated colonoscopy: retrospective analysis of data from a single tertiary medical center in China. Med (Baltim). 2018;97:e12297.CrossRef Wang CL, Huang ZP, Chen K, et al. Adenoma miss rate determined by very shortly repeated colonoscopy: retrospective analysis of data from a single tertiary medical center in China. Med (Baltim). 2018;97:e12297.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Almansa C, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, Preissler S, Wallace MB. Association between visual gaze patterns and adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a preliminary investigation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1070–4.CrossRefPubMed Almansa C, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, Preissler S, Wallace MB. Association between visual gaze patterns and adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a preliminary investigation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1070–4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dik VK, Hooge IT, van Oijen MG, Siersema PD. Measuring gaze patterns during colonoscopy: a useful tool to evaluate colon inspection? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28:1400–6.CrossRefPubMed Dik VK, Hooge IT, van Oijen MG, Siersema PD. Measuring gaze patterns during colonoscopy: a useful tool to evaluate colon inspection? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28:1400–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lami M, Singh H, Dilley JH, et al. Gaze patterns hold key to unlocking successful search strategies and increasing polyp detection rate in colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2018;50:701–7.CrossRefPubMed Lami M, Singh H, Dilley JH, et al. Gaze patterns hold key to unlocking successful search strategies and increasing polyp detection rate in colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2018;50:701–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B, Rothstein R, Baron J. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:194–9.CrossRefPubMed Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B, Rothstein R, Baron J. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:194–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kasugai K, Miyata M, Hashimoto T, et al. Assessment of miss and incidence rates of neoplastic polyps at colonoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2005;17:44–9.CrossRef Kasugai K, Miyata M, Hashimoto T, et al. Assessment of miss and incidence rates of neoplastic polyps at colonoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2005;17:44–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Calderwood AH, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, Logan JR, Zurfluh M, Jacobson BC. Boston Bowel Preparation scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:269–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Calderwood AH, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, Logan JR, Zurfluh M, Jacobson BC. Boston Bowel Preparation scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:269–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Delavari A, Salimzadeh H, Bishehsari F, et al. Mean Polyp per patient is an Accurate and readily obtainable surrogate for Adenoma Detection Rate: results from an opportunistic screening Colonoscopy Program. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2015;7:214–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Delavari A, Salimzadeh H, Bishehsari F, et al. Mean Polyp per patient is an Accurate and readily obtainable surrogate for Adenoma Detection Rate: results from an opportunistic screening Colonoscopy Program. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2015;7:214–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–41.CrossRefPubMed Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–41.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Xu L, He X, Zhou J, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of polyp detection. Cancer Med. 2021;10:7184–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xu L, He X, Zhou J, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of polyp detection. Cancer Med. 2021;10:7184–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Kruse GR, Khan SM, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ, Sequist TD. Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:277–83.CrossRefPubMed Kruse GR, Khan SM, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ, Sequist TD. Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:277–83.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Shimoda R, Sakata Y, Fujise T, et al. The adenoma miss rate of blue-laser imaging vs. white-light imaging during colonoscopy: a randomized tandem trial. Endoscopy. 2017;49:186–90.PubMed Shimoda R, Sakata Y, Fujise T, et al. The adenoma miss rate of blue-laser imaging vs. white-light imaging during colonoscopy: a randomized tandem trial. Endoscopy. 2017;49:186–90.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Min M, Deng P, Zhang W, Sun X, Liu Y, Nong B. Comparison of linked color imaging and white-light colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:724–30.CrossRefPubMed Min M, Deng P, Zhang W, Sun X, Liu Y, Nong B. Comparison of linked color imaging and white-light colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:724–30.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kumar S, Thosani N, Ladabaum U, et al. Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1273–80.CrossRefPubMed Kumar S, Thosani N, Ladabaum U, et al. Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1273–80.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Teng TY, Khor SN, Kailasam M, Cheah WK, Lau CC. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1796–803.CrossRefPubMed Teng TY, Khor SN, Kailasam M, Cheah WK, Lau CC. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1796–803.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, Crowell MD. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1466–71.CrossRefPubMed Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, Crowell MD. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1466–71.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Barakat M, Panchal A, Abdelfatah MM, Elhanafi S, Carr-Locke DL, Othman MO. Morning versus afternoon adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32:467–74.CrossRefPubMed Barakat M, Panchal A, Abdelfatah MM, Elhanafi S, Carr-Locke DL, Othman MO. Morning versus afternoon adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32:467–74.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Sapci I, Jia X, Wu J, et al. Does time of day matter for colonoscopy quality? A review of over 13,000 screening colonoscopies in a colorectal surgery unit. Am J Surg. 2022;223:500–2.CrossRefPubMed Sapci I, Jia X, Wu J, et al. Does time of day matter for colonoscopy quality? A review of over 13,000 screening colonoscopies in a colorectal surgery unit. Am J Surg. 2022;223:500–2.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Eckardt AJ, Kheder J, Basil A, et al. Trainee participation during screening colonoscopy does not affect ADR at subsequent surveillance, but may result in early follow-up. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8:E1732–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eckardt AJ, Kheder J, Basil A, et al. Trainee participation during screening colonoscopy does not affect ADR at subsequent surveillance, but may result in early follow-up. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8:E1732–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Sey M, Cocco S, McDonald C, et al. Association of trainee participation in colonoscopy procedures with quality metrics. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2229538.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sey M, Cocco S, McDonald C, et al. Association of trainee participation in colonoscopy procedures with quality metrics. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2229538.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Martínez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastorenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRef Martínez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastorenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of switching endoscopists for repeat surveillance colonoscopy: a retrospective study
Authors
Naoya Okada
Jun Arimoto
Takanori Nishiguchi
Mikio Kobayashi
Toshihiro Niikura
Hiroki Kuwabara
Michiko Nakaoka
Atsushi Nakajima
Hideyuki Chiba
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Colonoscopy
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-230X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02981-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Gastroenterology 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.