Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016

01-05-2016

Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates

Authors: Tze Yeong Teng, Shao Nan Khor, Manimegalai Kailasam, Wei Keat Cheah, Cheryl Chien Li Lau

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Higher adenoma detection rates are associated with decreased risks for subsequent colorectal cancers. Studies have suggested that adenoma detection rate (ADR) may be affected by timing of colonoscopy due to endoscopist fatigue later in the day. The aim of our study is to assess the influence of the timing variables on ADR.

Methods

Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed on a prospective colonoscopy database, comparing ADR for colonoscopies performed in the morning shift (AM) and in the afternoon shift (PM) over a 1-year period. Each shift lasted 4 h. Only elective outpatient completed colonoscopies with adequate bowel preparation, performed by four certified staff endoscopists, were included. Surveillance colonoscopies for cancers were excluded. ADR was defined as the detection of at least one histologically confirmed polyp during colonoscopy.

Results

A total of 533 colonoscopies were included. ADR was 25 % in the cohort. Mean age was 59 (SD 14.1). Two hundred and seventy (50.6 %) were done in the AM and 263 (49.4 %) were done in the PM. ADR was 29 % in the AM group compared to 21 % in the PM group (p = 0.03). Excluding time needed for polypectomy, the mean time taken for scope withdrawal was significantly longer in the morning group (12 min) compared with the afternoon group (10 min) (p = 0.002). The longer withdrawal time in the morning was significantly associated with increased ADRs (OR 1.104, 95 % CI 1.063–1.147) (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Timing of colonoscopy is an independent predictor for ADR. Colonoscopies performed in the morning have a longer mean withdrawal time, thus leading to a significantly higher ADR. As endoscopists concentration decreases as the day progresses, this may account for the shorter time spent on colonoscopies on the afternoon.
Literature
1.
go back to reference US Cancer Statistics Working Group (2014). United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. www.cdc.gov/uscs US Cancer Statistics Working Group (2014). United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. www.​cdc.​gov/​uscs
3.
go back to reference Hill MJ, Morson BC, Bussey HJR (1978) Etiology of adenoma-carcinoma sequence in large bowel. Lancet 311:245–247CrossRef Hill MJ, Morson BC, Bussey HJR (1978) Etiology of adenoma-carcinoma sequence in large bowel. Lancet 311:245–247CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrew KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ, American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group, US Multi-Society Task Force, American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570–1595CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrew KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ, American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group, US Multi-Society Task Force, American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570–1595CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, Ackroyd F, Shike M, Kurtz RC, Hornsby-Lewis L, Gerdes H, Steward ET, National Polyp Study Work Group (1992) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, Ackroyd F, Shike M, Kurtz RC, Hornsby-Lewis L, Gerdes H, Steward ET, National Polyp Study Work Group (1992) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E (2006) Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101:343–350CrossRefPubMed van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E (2006) Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101:343–350CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD (2012) Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy 44:470–475CrossRefPubMed Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD (2012) Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy 44:470–475CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1795–1803CrossRefPubMed Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1795–1803CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L (2007) Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 132:96–102CrossRefPubMed Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L (2007) Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 132:96–102CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, Bakker CM, Keulen ET, de Ridder RJ, Winkens B, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S (2014) Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut 63:957–963CrossRefPubMed le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, Bakker CM, Keulen ET, de Ridder RJ, Winkens B, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S (2014) Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut 63:957–963CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kang HW, Kim D, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Kim YS, Park MJ, Kim JS, Cho SH, Sung MW, Jung HC, Lee HS, Song IS (2010) Visceral obesity and insulin resistance are risk factors for colorectal adenoma: a cross-sectional, case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 105:178–187CrossRefPubMed Kang HW, Kim D, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Kim YS, Park MJ, Kim JS, Cho SH, Sung MW, Jung HC, Lee HS, Song IS (2010) Visceral obesity and insulin resistance are risk factors for colorectal adenoma: a cross-sectional, case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 105:178–187CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, Giordanino C, Rondonotti E, Curcio G, Dulbecco P, Fabbri C, Della Casa D, Maiero S, Simone A, Iacopini F, Feliciangeli G, Manes G, Rinaldi A, Zullo A, Rogai F, Repici A (2012) A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:501–506CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, Giordanino C, Rondonotti E, Curcio G, Dulbecco P, Fabbri C, Della Casa D, Maiero S, Simone A, Iacopini F, Feliciangeli G, Manes G, Rinaldi A, Zullo A, Rogai F, Repici A (2012) A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:501–506CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, Kirk LM, Litlin S, Lieberman DA, Waye JD, Church J, Marshall JB, Riddell RH, US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (2002) Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1296–1308CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, Kirk LM, Litlin S, Lieberman DA, Waye JD, Church J, Marshall JB, Riddell RH, US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (2002) Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1296–1308CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P (2003) Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 58:76–79CrossRefPubMed Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P (2003) Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 58:76–79CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RW (2006) Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Eng J Med 355:2533–2541CrossRef Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RW (2006) Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Eng J Med 355:2533–2541CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP (2005) Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 61:378–384CrossRefPubMed Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP (2005) Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 61:378–384CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lee TJ, Blanks RG, Rees CJ, Wright KC, Nickerson C, Moss SM, Chilton A, Goddard AF, Patnick J, McNally RJ, Rutter MD (2013) Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel cancer screening programme in England. Endoscopy 45:20–26CrossRefPubMed Lee TJ, Blanks RG, Rees CJ, Wright KC, Nickerson C, Moss SM, Chilton A, Goddard AF, Patnick J, McNally RJ, Rutter MD (2013) Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel cancer screening programme in England. Endoscopy 45:20–26CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, Dufrayne F, Bergman G (2000) A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 52:346–352CrossRefPubMed Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, Dufrayne F, Bergman G (2000) A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 52:346–352CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rex DK (2000) Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 51(4 Pt 1):451–459CrossRefPubMed Rex DK (2000) Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 51(4 Pt 1):451–459CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sanaka MR, Shah N, Mullen KD, Ferguson DR, Thomas C, McCullough AJ (2006) Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2726–2730CrossRefPubMed Sanaka MR, Shah N, Mullen KD, Ferguson DR, Thomas C, McCullough AJ (2006) Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2726–2730CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wells CD, Heigh RI, Sharma VK, Crowell MD, Gurudu SR, Leighton JA, Mattek N, Fleischer DE (2007) Comparison of morning versus afternoon cecal intubation rates. BMC Gastroenterol 7:19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wells CD, Heigh RI, Sharma VK, Crowell MD, Gurudu SR, Leighton JA, Mattek N, Fleischer DE (2007) Comparison of morning versus afternoon cecal intubation rates. BMC Gastroenterol 7:19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, Lopez R, Burke CA (2009) Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1659–1664CrossRefPubMed Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, Lopez R, Burke CA (2009) Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1659–1664CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Chan MY, Cohen H, Spiegel BM (2009) Fewer polyps are detected by colonoscopy as the day progressed at a Veteran’s Administration teaching hospital. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:1217–1223CrossRefPubMed Chan MY, Cohen H, Spiegel BM (2009) Fewer polyps are detected by colonoscopy as the day progressed at a Veteran’s Administration teaching hospital. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:1217–1223CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Freedman JS, Harari DY, Bamji ND, Bodian CA, Kornacki S, Cohen LB, Miller KM, Aisenberg J (2011) The detection of premalignant colon polyps during endoscopy is stable throughout the workday. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1197–1206CrossRefPubMed Freedman JS, Harari DY, Bamji ND, Bodian CA, Kornacki S, Cohen LB, Miller KM, Aisenberg J (2011) The detection of premalignant colon polyps during endoscopy is stable throughout the workday. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1197–1206CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lurix E, Hernandez AV, Thoma M, Castro F (2012) Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time or modified queue position. Gastrointest Endosc 75:827–834CrossRefPubMed Lurix E, Hernandez AV, Thoma M, Castro F (2012) Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time or modified queue position. Gastrointest Endosc 75:827–834CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Bhansali A, Yamanaka H, Neeman N, Sheth S, Sawhney M, Lamont JT, Aronson MD (2012) Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 75:554–560CrossRefPubMed Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Bhansali A, Yamanaka H, Neeman N, Sheth S, Sawhney M, Lamont JT, Aronson MD (2012) Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 75:554–560CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Munson GW, Harewood GC, Francis DL (2011) Time of day variation in polyp detection rate for colonoscopies performed on a 3-hour shift schedule. Gastrointest Endosc 73(3):467–475CrossRefPubMed Munson GW, Harewood GC, Francis DL (2011) Time of day variation in polyp detection rate for colonoscopies performed on a 3-hour shift schedule. Gastrointest Endosc 73(3):467–475CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, Crowell MD (2011) Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1466–1471CrossRefPubMed Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, Crowell MD (2011) Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1466–1471CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lee A, Iskander JM, Gupta N, Borg BB, Zuckerman G, Banerjee B, Gyawali CP (2011) Queue position in the endoscopic schedule impacts effectiveness of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1457–1465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee A, Iskander JM, Gupta N, Borg BB, Zuckerman G, Banerjee B, Gyawali CP (2011) Queue position in the endoscopic schedule impacts effectiveness of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1457–1465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Kang HY, Kim D, Kim HJ, Kang SJ, Chung GE, Song JH, Yang SY, Kim YS, Park MJ, Yim JY, Lim SH, Kim JS (2014) The relationship between colonoscopy procedure order and adenoma detection rates. J Clin Gastroenterol. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000258 Kang HY, Kim D, Kim HJ, Kang SJ, Chung GE, Song JH, Yang SY, Kim YS, Park MJ, Yim JY, Lim SH, Kim JS (2014) The relationship between colonoscopy procedure order and adenoma detection rates. J Clin Gastroenterol. doi:10.​1097/​MCG.​0000000000000258​
33.
go back to reference West CP, Tan AD, Habermann TM, Sloan JA, Shanafelt TD (2009) Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors. JAMA 302:1294–1300CrossRefPubMed West CP, Tan AD, Habermann TM, Sloan JA, Shanafelt TD (2009) Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors. JAMA 302:1294–1300CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Dinesen L, Chua TJ, Kaffes AJ (2012) Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 75(3):604–611CrossRefPubMed Dinesen L, Chua TJ, Kaffes AJ (2012) Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 75(3):604–611CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Lee CK, Cha JM, Kim WJ (2015) Endoscopist fatigue may contribute to a decline in the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 49:e51–e56 Lee CK, Cha JM, Kim WJ (2015) Endoscopist fatigue may contribute to a decline in the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 49:e51–e56
Metadata
Title
Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates
Authors
Tze Yeong Teng
Shao Nan Khor
Manimegalai Kailasam
Wei Keat Cheah
Cheryl Chien Li Lau
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4448-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016 Go to the issue