Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Breast

Clinical utility of 18F-FDG-PET/MR for preoperative breast cancer staging

Authors: Diomidis Botsikas, Anastasia Kalovidouri, Minerva Becker, Michele Copercini, Dahila Amal Djema, Alexandre Bodmer, Sindy Monnier, Christoph D. Becker, Xavier Montet, Benedicte M. A. Delattre, Osman Ratib, Valentina Garibotto, Claire Tabouret-Viaud

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) for preoperative breast cancer staging.

Methods

Preoperative PET/MR exams of 58 consecutive women with breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Histology and mean follow-up of 26 months served as gold standard. Four experienced readers evaluated primary lesions, lymph nodes and distant metastases with contrast-enhanced MRI, qualitative/quantitative PET, and combined PET/MR. ROC curves were calculated for all modalities and their combinations.

Results

The study included 101 breast lesions (83 malignant, 18 benign) and 198 lymph node groups, (34 malignant, 164 benign). Two patients had distant metastases. Areas under the curve (AUC) for breast cancer were 0.9558, 0.8347 and 0.8855 with MRI, and with qualitative and quantitative PET/MR, respectively (p = 0.066). Sensitivity for primary cancers with MRI and quantitative PET/MR was 100 % and 77 % (p = 0.004), and for lymph nodes 88 % and 79 % (p = 0.25), respectively. Specificity for MRI and PET/MR for primary cancers was 67 % and 100 % (p = 0.03) and for lymph nodes 98 % and 100 % (p = 0.25).

Conclusions

In breast cancer patients, MRI alone has the highest sensitivity for primary tumours. For nodal metastases, both MRI and PET/MR are highly specific.

Key points

MRI alone and PET/MR have a similar overall diagnostic performance.
MRI alone has a higher sensitivity than PET/MR for local tumour assessment.
Both MRI and PET/MR have a limited sensitivity for nodal metastases.
Positive lymph nodes on MRI or PET/MR do not require presurgical biopsy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hacker A, Sedlacek S (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging: the evolution of breast imaging. Breast 22:S77–S82CrossRefPubMed Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hacker A, Sedlacek S (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging: the evolution of breast imaging. Breast 22:S77–S82CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P et al (2014) Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Investig Radiol 49:421–430CrossRef Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P et al (2014) Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Investig Radiol 49:421–430CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Valentini M, Houssami N (2012) EUSOMA criteria for performing preoperative MRI staging in candidates for breast conserving surgery: hype or helpful? Breast 21:406–408CrossRefPubMed Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Valentini M, Houssami N (2012) EUSOMA criteria for performing preoperative MRI staging in candidates for breast conserving surgery: hype or helpful? Breast 21:406–408CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Knuttel FM, Menezes GL, van den Bosch MA, Gilhuijs KG, Peters NH (2014) Current clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. J Surg Oncol 110:26–31CrossRefPubMed Knuttel FM, Menezes GL, van den Bosch MA, Gilhuijs KG, Peters NH (2014) Current clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. J Surg Oncol 110:26–31CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA et al (2011) Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET - randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47:879–886CrossRefPubMed Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA et al (2011) Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET - randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47:879–886CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571CrossRefPubMed Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Menezes GL, Knuttel FM, Stehouwer BL, Pijnappel RM, van den Bosch MA (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: a literature review and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 5:61–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Menezes GL, Knuttel FM, Stehouwer BL, Pijnappel RM, van den Bosch MA (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: a literature review and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 5:61–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Lee SC, Jain PA, Jethwa SC, Tripathy D, Yamashita MW (2014) Radiologist's role in breast cancer staging: providing key information for clinicians. Radiographics 34:330–342CrossRefPubMed Lee SC, Jain PA, Jethwa SC, Tripathy D, Yamashita MW (2014) Radiologist's role in breast cancer staging: providing key information for clinicians. Radiographics 34:330–342CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Smethurst HB, Lundgren S, Fjosne HE, Haraldseth O (2000) Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 10:1464–1471CrossRefPubMed Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Smethurst HB, Lundgren S, Fjosne HE, Haraldseth O (2000) Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 10:1464–1471CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Costa A, Norton L et al (2014) ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2). Breast 23:489–502CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, Costa A, Norton L et al (2014) ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2). Breast 23:489–502CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Blair SL et al (2014) Breast cancer version 3.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12:542–590 Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Blair SL et al (2014) Breast cancer version 3.2014. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12:542–590
14.
go back to reference Kim J, Lee J, Chang E et al (2009) Selective sentinel node plus additional non-sentinel node biopsy based on an FDG-PET/CT scan in early breast cancer patients: single institutional experience. World J Surg 33:943–949CrossRefPubMed Kim J, Lee J, Chang E et al (2009) Selective sentinel node plus additional non-sentinel node biopsy based on an FDG-PET/CT scan in early breast cancer patients: single institutional experience. World J Surg 33:943–949CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ueda S, Tsuda H, Asakawa H et al (2008) Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer 8:165CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ueda S, Tsuda H, Asakawa H et al (2008) Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer 8:165CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Bellevre D, Blanc Fournier C, Switsers O et al (2014) Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with (1)(8)F-FDG PET: how small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Image 41:1103–1112CrossRef Bellevre D, Blanc Fournier C, Switsers O et al (2014) Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with (1)(8)F-FDG PET: how small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Image 41:1103–1112CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vinh-Hung V, Everaert H, Lamote J et al (2012) Diagnostic and prognostic correlates of preoperative FDG PET for breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Image 39:1618–1627CrossRef Vinh-Hung V, Everaert H, Lamote J et al (2012) Diagnostic and prognostic correlates of preoperative FDG PET for breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Image 39:1618–1627CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Espie M et al (2011) The yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clinical stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast cancer: a prospective study. J Nucl Med 52:1526–1534CrossRefPubMed Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Espie M et al (2011) The yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clinical stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast cancer: a prospective study. J Nucl Med 52:1526–1534CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bernsdorf M, Berthelsen AK, Wielenga VT et al (2012) Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23:2277–2282CrossRefPubMed Bernsdorf M, Berthelsen AK, Wielenga VT et al (2012) Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23:2277–2282CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Groheux D, Moretti JL, Baillet G et al (2008) Effect of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with clinical Stage II and III breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:695–704CrossRefPubMed Groheux D, Moretti JL, Baillet G et al (2008) Effect of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with clinical Stage II and III breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:695–704CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hausmann D, Kern C, Schroder MT et al (2011) Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer—a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines. RöFo 183:1130–1137PubMed Hausmann D, Kern C, Schroder MT et al (2011) Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer—a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines. RöFo 183:1130–1137PubMed
22.
go back to reference Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Haug A et al (2008) Comprehensive imaging of tumour recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG-PET-CT. Eur J Radiol 65:47–58CrossRefPubMed Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Haug A et al (2008) Comprehensive imaging of tumour recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG-PET-CT. Eur J Radiol 65:47–58CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dietzel M, Zoubi R, Burmeister HP, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA, Baltzer PA (2012) Combined staging at one stop using MR mammography: evaluation of an extended protocol to screen for distant metastasis in primary breast cancer - initial results and diagnostic accuracy in a prospective study. RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 184:618–623CrossRefPubMed Dietzel M, Zoubi R, Burmeister HP, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA, Baltzer PA (2012) Combined staging at one stop using MR mammography: evaluation of an extended protocol to screen for distant metastasis in primary breast cancer - initial results and diagnostic accuracy in a prospective study. RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 184:618–623CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Vargas MI, Becker M, Garibotto V et al (2013) Approaches for the optimization of MR protocols in clinical hybrid PET/MRI studies. MAGMA 26:57–69CrossRefPubMed Vargas MI, Becker M, Garibotto V et al (2013) Approaches for the optimization of MR protocols in clinical hybrid PET/MRI studies. MAGMA 26:57–69CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kalemis A, Delattre BM, Heinzer S (2013) Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner: concept, clinical use, and optimisation after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer's perspective. MAGMA 26:5–23CrossRefPubMed Kalemis A, Delattre BM, Heinzer S (2013) Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner: concept, clinical use, and optimisation after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer's perspective. MAGMA 26:5–23CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference D’Orsi CJSE, Mendelson EB, Morris EA et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® ATLAS breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA D’Orsi CJSE, Mendelson EB, Morris EA et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® ATLAS breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
27.
go back to reference Baltzer PA, Kaiser WA, Dietzel M (2015) Lesion type and reader experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI: a multiple reader ROC study. Eur J Radiol 84:86–91CrossRefPubMed Baltzer PA, Kaiser WA, Dietzel M (2015) Lesion type and reader experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI: a multiple reader ROC study. Eur J Radiol 84:86–91CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Burmeister HP et al (2011) Application of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective study. Am J Roentgenol 196:W641–W647CrossRef Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Burmeister HP et al (2011) Application of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective study. Am J Roentgenol 196:W641–W647CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Riedl CC, Slobod E, Jochelson M et al (2014) Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. J Nucl Med 55:1578–1583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Riedl CC, Slobod E, Jochelson M et al (2014) Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. J Nucl Med 55:1578–1583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Laffon E, de Clermont H, Marthan R (2011) A method of adjusting SUV for injection-acquisition time differences in (18)F-FDG PET imaging. Eur Radiol 21:2417–2424CrossRefPubMed Laffon E, de Clermont H, Marthan R (2011) A method of adjusting SUV for injection-acquisition time differences in (18)F-FDG PET imaging. Eur Radiol 21:2417–2424CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Tabouret-Viaud C, Botsikas D, Delattre BM et al (2015) PET/MR in breast cancer. Semin Nucl Med 45:304–321CrossRefPubMed Tabouret-Viaud C, Botsikas D, Delattre BM et al (2015) PET/MR in breast cancer. Semin Nucl Med 45:304–321CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Pace L, Nicolai E, Luongo A et al (2014) Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues. Eur J Radiol 83:289–296CrossRefPubMed Pace L, Nicolai E, Luongo A et al (2014) Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues. Eur J Radiol 83:289–296CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Taneja S, Jena A, Goel R, Sarin R, Kaul S (2014) Simultaneous whole-body F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol 83:2231–9CrossRefPubMed Taneja S, Jena A, Goel R, Sarin R, Kaul S (2014) Simultaneous whole-body F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol 83:2231–9CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Bitencourt AG, Lima EN, Chojniak R et al (2014) Multiparametric evaluation of breast lesions using PET-MRI: initial results and future perspectives. Medicine 93:e115CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bitencourt AG, Lima EN, Chojniak R et al (2014) Multiparametric evaluation of breast lesions using PET-MRI: initial results and future perspectives. Medicine 93:e115CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Bitencourt AG, Lima EN, Chojniak R et al (2014) Can 18F-FDG PET improve the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions on MRI? Eur J Radiol 83:1381–1386CrossRefPubMed Bitencourt AG, Lima EN, Chojniak R et al (2014) Can 18F-FDG PET improve the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions on MRI? Eur J Radiol 83:1381–1386CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Byun BH, Noh WC, Lim I et al (2013) A new method for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using sequential (18)F-FDG PET and MRI: correlation with histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Ann Nucl Med 27:720–728CrossRefPubMed Byun BH, Noh WC, Lim I et al (2013) A new method for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using sequential (18)F-FDG PET and MRI: correlation with histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Ann Nucl Med 27:720–728CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P et al (2014) Improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumours with multiparametric 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study. Clin Cancer Res 20:3540–3549CrossRefPubMed Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P et al (2014) Improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumours with multiparametric 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study. Clin Cancer Res 20:3540–3549CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME et al (2014) Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1303–1310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME et al (2014) Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1303–1310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 305:569–575CrossRef Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 305:569–575CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB et al (2014) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 32:1365–1383CrossRefPubMed Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB et al (2014) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 32:1365–1383CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical utility of 18F-FDG-PET/MR for preoperative breast cancer staging
Authors
Diomidis Botsikas
Anastasia Kalovidouri
Minerva Becker
Michele Copercini
Dahila Amal Djema
Alexandre Bodmer
Sindy Monnier
Christoph D. Becker
Xavier Montet
Benedicte M. A. Delattre
Osman Ratib
Valentina Garibotto
Claire Tabouret-Viaud
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4054-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

European Radiology 7/2016 Go to the issue