Published in:
01-11-2018 | Original Article
Clinical outcome of granulocyte transfusion therapy for the treatment of refractory infection in neutropenic patients with hematological diseases
Authors:
Biqi Zhou, Tiemei Song, Yufeng Feng, Ziling Zhu, Weirong Chang, Yuejun Liu, Aining Sun, Depei Wu, Yang Xu
Published in:
Annals of Hematology
|
Issue 11/2018
Login to get access
Abstract
Neutropenic patients with hematological diseases are prone to severe infections. Granulocyte transfusion therapy (GTX) is considered as a logical therapeutic approach for these problems. However, the efficacy and complications of GTX have not been well identified. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of GTX therapy in our hospital from 2009 to 2015. After 117 granulocyte transfusions for 47 patients, 72.3% of these patients’ infections were effectively improved, and the overall survival rates at 30 and 120 days were 66.0 and 57.5%, respectively. The patients who experienced neutrophil recovery within 10 days after their therapy initiation had a better response and long-term survival period (14/15, 93.3%, vs 20/32, 62.5%, P = 0.037). Higher-dose granulocytes (> 2.55 × 108/kg) might improve the effective rate of infection in the patients who had more than 10 days neutrophil recovery time (17/23, 73.9%, vs 3/9, 33.3%, P = 0.049). In addition, GTX benefited the patients who suffered from pulmonary bacterial infections (16/20, 80%) compared with the bloodstream infection group (7/12, 58.3%) and skin or mucous infection group (1/5, 20%). The primary data showed that GTX did not affect the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and cytomegalovirus viremia when patients received further HSCT treatment. Collectively, GTX was an adjunct treatment modality for severely neutropenic patients who were likely to experience hematopoietic recovery. More randomized trials are needed to verify the efficacy and complications of GTX therapy.