Top

European Radiology

Published in:

01-04-2016 | Computed Tomography

Clinical indications and radiation doses to the conceptus associated with CT imaging in pregnancy: a retrospective study

Authors: S. Woussen, X. Lopez-Rendon, D. Vanbeckevoort, H. Bosmans, R. Oyen, F. Zanca

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2016

Abstract

Objective

To perform an internal audit at a university hospital with the aim of evaluating the number, clinical indication and operating procedure of computed tomography (CT) performed on pregnant patients and of estimating the radiation doses to the conceptus.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all CT examinations performed in a single centre on pregnant patients between January 2008 and July 2013. The radiation doses to the conceptus were estimated. The results were compared with published data.

Results

The number of CT examinations during pregnancy increased from 3–4 per year in 2008–2011 to 11 per year in 2012. The mean estimated conceptus radiation dose was considered negligible for CT of the head and cervical spine, being less than 0.01 mGy, and for CT of the chest, less than 0.1 mGy. The estimated conceptus radiation dose from abdominopelvic CT was on average 28.7 mGy (range 6.7–60.5 mGy).

Conclusions

The number of CT scans of pregnant patients increased threefold during the last few years. Most clinical indications and doses were in line with good clinical practice and literature; only in two cases the dose to the conceptus was higher than 50 mGy.

Key points

• An increase in CT imaging of pregnant patients is of concern.

• Clinical indications were in line with good practice.

• Estimated conceptus doses were lower or similar to published data.

• Internal guidelines for appropriate use of imaging during pregnancy should be established.

Lazarus E, DeBenedectis C, North D, Spencer PK, Mayo-Smith WW (2009) Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients—1997–2006. Radiology 251:517–524CrossRefPubMed

Goldberg-Stein SA, Liu B, Hahn PF, Lee SI (2012) Radiation dose management: part 2, estimating fetal radiation risk from CT during pregnancy. Am J Roentgenol 198:352–356CrossRef

Nguyen CP, Goodman LH (2012) Fetal risk in diagnostic radiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 33:4–10CrossRef

Kennedy EV, Iball GR, Brettle DS (2007) Investigation into the effects of lead shielding for fetal dose reduction in CT pulmonary angiography. Br J Radiol 80:631–638CrossRefPubMed

McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD, Braun NN, Regner DM, Brown DL et al (2007) Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? Radiographics 27:909–917CrossRefPubMed

Sadro CT, Dubinsky TJ (2013) CT in pregnancy: risks and benefits. Appl Radiol 42:6–16

Wagner LK, Applegate KE (2011) Re: More cautions on imaging of pregnant patients. Radiographics 31:891CrossRefPubMed

Patel SJ, Reede DL, Katz DS, Subramaniam R, Amorosa JK (2007) Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations. Radiographics 27:1705–1722CrossRefPubMed

Damilakis J, Tzedakis A, Perisinakis K, Papadakis AE (2010) A method of estimating conceptus doses resulting from multidetector CT examinations during all stages of gestation. Med Phys 37:6411–6420CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi T, Reiman RE, Goodman PC, Paulson EK, Frush DP et al (2006) Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. Am J Roentgenol 186:871–876CrossRef

11.

Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Voloudaki A, Gourtsoyiannis N (2000) Estimation of fetal radiation dose from computed tomography scanning in late pregnancy: depth-dose data from routine examinations. Invest Radiol 35:527–533CrossRefPubMed

12.

Jaffe TA, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva GI, Nguyen G, Hurwitz LM, Nelson RC (2008) Early first-trimester fetal radiation dose estimation in 16-MDCT without and with automated tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol 190:860–864CrossRef

13.

Lopez-Rendon X, Zhang G, Bosmans H, Oyen R, Zanca F (2014) Implementing the complete beam hardening effect of the bowtie filter versus scaling beam intensities: effects on dosimetric applications in computed tomography. J Med Imaging 1:033507CrossRef

14.

Cassart M, Massez A, Cos T, Tecco L, Thomas D, Van Regemorter N et al (2007) Contribution of three-dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of fetal skeletal dysplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:537–543CrossRefPubMed

15.

Angel E, Wellnitz CV, Goodsitt MM, Yaghmai N, DeMarco JJ, Cagnon CH et al (2008) Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size. Radiology 249:220–227CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Gu J, Bednarz B, Caracappa PF, Xu XG (2009) The development, validation and application of a multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner model for assessing organ doses to the pregnant patient and the fetus using Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 54:2699CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Gu J, Xu XG, Caracappa PF, Liu B (2013) Fetal doses to pregnant patients from CT with tube current modulation calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and realistic phantoms. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 155:64–72CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Wieseler KM, Bhargava P, Kanal KM, Vaidya S, Stewart BK, Dighe MK (2010) Imaging in pregnant patients: examination appropriateness. Radiographics 30:1215–1229CrossRefPubMed

19.

Wang PI, Chong ST, Kielar AZ, Kelly AM, Knoepp UD, Mazza MB et al (2012) Imaging of pregnant and lactating patients: part 1, evidence-based review and recommendations. Am J Roentgenol 198:778–784CrossRef

20.

Solomou G, Papadakis AE, Damilakis J (2015) Abdominal CT during pregnancy: a phantom study on the effect of patient centring on conceptus radiation dose and image quality. European Radiol 25:911–921CrossRef

21.

Hidajat N, Schröder RJ, Vogl T, Schedel H, Felix R (1996) The efficacy of lead shielding in patient dosage reduction in computed tomography. Röfo 165:462–465PubMed

22.

Austin LM, Frush DP (2011) Compendium of national guidelines for imaging the pregnant patient. Am J Roentgenol 197:W737–W746CrossRef

Title: Clinical indications and radiation doses to the conceptus associated with CT imaging in pregnancy: a retrospective study
Authors: S. Woussen
X. Lopez-Rendon
D. Vanbeckevoort
H. Bosmans
R. Oyen
F. Zanca
Publication date: 01-04-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Radiology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3924-8

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Clinical indications and radiation doses to the conceptus associated with CT imaging in pregnancy: a retrospective study

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key points

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key points

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer

Functional gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)

ESGAR consensus statement on liver MR imaging and clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents

Real-time virtual sonography examination and biopsy for suspicious breast lesions identified on MRI alone

Contrast-enhanced MRI of the knee in children unaffected by clinical arthritis compared to clinically active juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients

Chemical shift MRI can aid in the diagnosis of indeterminate skeletal lesions of the spine