Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Article

Clinical evaluation of 292 Genesis II posterior stabilized high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: range of motion and predictors

Authors: Mathijs C. H. W. Fuchs, Rob P. A. Janssen

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the range of motion and complications after Genesis II total knee arthroplasty with high-flexion tibia insert (TKA–HF). Furthermore, difference in knee flexion between high flexion and standard inserts was compared. The hypothesis was that knee flexion is better after high-flexion TKA. A total of 292 TKA–HF were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up was 24.3 months. The range of motion was compared between TKA–HF (high-flexion group) and a comparable cohort of 86 Genesis II TKA with a standard tibia insert (control group). Surgeries were performed by one experienced knee orthopedic surgeon. Knee flexion in the high-flexion group increased from 114.8° preoperatively to 118.0° postoperatively (P < 0.01). Knee extension in the high-flexion group increased from −4.5° preoperatively to −0.4° after surgery (P < 0.01). Mean knee flexion was 5.52° (±1.46°) better in the high-flexion group compared with the control group (P < 0.01). Preoperative range of motion, body mass index, diabetes mellitus and patellofemoral pain significantly influenced range of motion. Few complications occurred after TKA–HF. The Genesis II TKA–HF showed good short-term results with limited complications. Knee flexion after Genesis II TKA–HF was better compared with a standard tibia insert.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T et al (2002) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty, a report on 27,372 knees operated between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71(3):262–267CrossRef Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T et al (2002) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty, a report on 27,372 knees operated between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71(3):262–267CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A et al (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A et al (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Harvey I, Barry K, Kirby S et al (1993) Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75-B(6):950–955 Harvey I, Barry K, Kirby S et al (1993) Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75-B(6):950–955
4.
go back to reference Kawamura H, Bourne R (2001) Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6:248–252PubMedCrossRef Kawamura H, Bourne R (2001) Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6:248–252PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE et al (2003) Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(7):1278–1285 Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE et al (2003) Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(7):1278–1285
6.
go back to reference Bong M, Di Cesare P (2004) Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12(3):164–171PubMed Bong M, Di Cesare P (2004) Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12(3):164–171PubMed
7.
go back to reference Li P, Wong Y, Wai Y (2007) Knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 15(2):149–153 Li P, Wong Y, Wai Y (2007) Knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 15(2):149–153
8.
go back to reference Moon HK, Han CD, Yang IH et al (2008) Factors affecting outcome after total knee arthroplasty in patients with diabetes mellitus. Yonsei Med J 49(1):129–137PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Moon HK, Han CD, Yang IH et al (2008) Factors affecting outcome after total knee arthroplasty in patients with diabetes mellitus. Yonsei Med J 49(1):129–137PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Seon JK, Park JK et al (2011) Comparisons of kinematics and range of motion in high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: cruciate retaining vs. substituting designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:2016–2022PubMedCrossRef Seon JK, Park JK et al (2011) Comparisons of kinematics and range of motion in high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: cruciate retaining vs. substituting designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:2016–2022PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Clarke H, Scuderi G (2003) Flexion instability in primary total knee replacement. J Knee Surg 16(2):123–128PubMed Clarke H, Scuderi G (2003) Flexion instability in primary total knee replacement. J Knee Surg 16(2):123–128PubMed
11.
go back to reference Graichen H, Strauch M, Katzhammer T et al (2007) Ligament instability in total knee arthroplasty-causal analysis. Orthopade 36(7):650–652PubMedCrossRef Graichen H, Strauch M, Katzhammer T et al (2007) Ligament instability in total knee arthroplasty-causal analysis. Orthopade 36(7):650–652PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Charron KD et al (2010) The role of polyethylene design on postoperative TKA flexion: an analysis of 1534 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:108–114PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Charron KD et al (2010) The role of polyethylene design on postoperative TKA flexion: an analysis of 1534 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:108–114PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kroon KE, Houterman S, Janssen RP (2012) Leg alignment and tibial slope after minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized radiological study of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial instrumentation. Knee 19:270–274PubMedCrossRef Kroon KE, Houterman S, Janssen RP (2012) Leg alignment and tibial slope after minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized radiological study of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial instrumentation. Knee 19:270–274PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference (1998) National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Obes Res 6(2):51S–209S (1998) National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Obes Res 6(2):51S–209S
15.
go back to reference Rutten SG, Janssen RP (2009) Spontaneous late dislocation of the high flexion tibial insert after Genesis II total knee arthroplasty. A case report. Knee 16(5):409–411PubMedCrossRef Rutten SG, Janssen RP (2009) Spontaneous late dislocation of the high flexion tibial insert after Genesis II total knee arthroplasty. A case report. Knee 16(5):409–411PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mehin R, Burnett R, Brseher P (2010) Does the new generation of high-flex knee prosthesis improve the post-operative range of movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92B(10):1429–1434CrossRef Mehin R, Burnett R, Brseher P (2010) Does the new generation of high-flex knee prosthesis improve the post-operative range of movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92B(10):1429–1434CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hamilton WG, Sritulanondha S, Engh CAJ (2011) Results of prospective, randomized clinical trials comparing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized TKA: a focused review. Orthopaedics 34(9):e500–e503 Hamilton WG, Sritulanondha S, Engh CAJ (2011) Results of prospective, randomized clinical trials comparing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized TKA: a focused review. Orthopaedics 34(9):e500–e503
19.
go back to reference McCalden R, MacDonald S, Bourne R et al (2009) A randomized controlled trial comparing “high-flex” vs. “standard” posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 24(6):33–38CrossRef McCalden R, MacDonald S, Bourne R et al (2009) A randomized controlled trial comparing “high-flex” vs. “standard” posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 24(6):33–38CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Laskin R (2007) The effect of a high-flex implant on postoperative flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30(8):86–88PubMed Laskin R (2007) The effect of a high-flex implant on postoperative flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30(8):86–88PubMed
21.
go back to reference Zeh A, Davis J, Laskin R et al (2009) Early results with the Genesis II posterior stabilized high flexion knee prosthesis a one year follow-up study. Acta Orthop Belg 75(6):792–800PubMed Zeh A, Davis J, Laskin R et al (2009) Early results with the Genesis II posterior stabilized high flexion knee prosthesis a one year follow-up study. Acta Orthop Belg 75(6):792–800PubMed
22.
go back to reference Laubenthal K, Smidt G, Kettelkamp D (1972) A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther 52:34–42PubMed Laubenthal K, Smidt G, Kettelkamp D (1972) A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther 52:34–42PubMed
23.
go back to reference Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP (2001) Activities of daily living in non-western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 24:191–198PubMedCrossRef Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP (2001) Activities of daily living in non-western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 24:191–198PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K et al (2002) Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplast 17(4):59–62CrossRef Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K et al (2002) Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplast 17(4):59–62CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Meneghini RM, Pierson JL, Bagsby D et al (2007) Is there a functional benefit to obtaining high flexion after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast 22(6):43–46CrossRef Meneghini RM, Pierson JL, Bagsby D et al (2007) Is there a functional benefit to obtaining high flexion after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast 22(6):43–46CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gandhi R, Tso P, Davey JR et al (2009) High-flexion implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee 16:14–17PubMedCrossRef Gandhi R, Tso P, Davey JR et al (2009) High-flexion implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee 16:14–17PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Frosch P, Decking J, Theis C et al (2004) Complications after total knee arthroplasty. A comprehensive report. Acta Orthop Belg 70:565–569PubMed Frosch P, Decking J, Theis C et al (2004) Complications after total knee arthroplasty. A comprehensive report. Acta Orthop Belg 70:565–569PubMed
28.
go back to reference Cushner F, Agnelli G, FitzGerald G et al (2010) Complications and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: results from the global orthopaedic registry (GLORY). Am J Orthop 39(9):22–28PubMed Cushner F, Agnelli G, FitzGerald G et al (2010) Complications and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: results from the global orthopaedic registry (GLORY). Am J Orthop 39(9):22–28PubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical evaluation of 292 Genesis II posterior stabilized high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: range of motion and predictors
Authors
Mathijs C. H. W. Fuchs
Rob P. A. Janssen
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1467-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2015 Go to the issue

Expert's Opinion (General Review)

State-of-the-art approach for bone sarcomas