Published in:
01-08-2019 | Cholecystitis | Original Article
White blood cell count and eosinopenia as valuable tools for the diagnosis of bacterial infections in the ED
Authors:
Charles-Eric Lavoignet, Pierrick Le Borgne, Sylvie Chabrier, Joffrey Bidoire, Hakim Slimani, Julia Chevrolet-Lavoignet, François Lefebvre, Rania Jebri, Luc Sengler, Pascal Bilbault, and the CREMS network
Published in:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
|
Issue 8/2019
Login to get access
Abstract
Identifying an infection may be difficult in the ED. Neutrophilic leukocytosis is often used in the diagnosis of infection despite its lack of specificity in situations of stress. Our objective was to study the value of each parameter of the WBC count, in particular eosinopenia, to diagnose bacterial infections in the ED. We conducted a retrospective and observational study over a period of 6 months. All patients with one of the following diagnoses were eligible: pneumonia (9.9%), pyelonephritis (26.2%), prostatitis (8.4%), appendicitis (26.2%), cholecystitis (8.4%), and diverticular sigmoiditis (5%). A total of 466 infected patients were included for statistical analysis, and a control group of 466 uninfected patients was randomly selected in the same period of time. All leukocyte count parameters were significantly modified (p < 0.001) in the infected group compared with the control group. Neutrophils and total leukocytes remain the two most suitable parameters for the diagnosis of infections in the ED. Eosinopenia represented the most efficient parameter of the WBC count for the diagnosis of urinary and biliary tract infections. Deep eosinopenia presented a specificity of 94% for the diagnosis of infection. Any modification of the WBC count associated with an elevation of CRP (> 40 mg/L) or fever (> 38.5 °C) showed a high specificity for the diagnosis of infection. A careful analysis of the WBC count remains a valuable tool for the diagnosis of infection in the ED.