Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Original Article

Chemoradiotherapy with and without deep regional hyperthermia for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

Authors: Prof. Dr. med. Oliver J. Ott, Dr. Manfred Schmidt, PD Dr. Sabine Semrau, Prof. Dr. Vratislav Strnad, Prof. Dr. Klaus E. Matzel, Prof. Dr. Ignaz Schneider, Dr. Dimitrios Raptis, Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Uter, Prof. Dr. Robert Grützmann, Prof. Dr. Rainer Fietkau

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare results after chemoradiotherapy with and without deep regional hyperthermia in patients with anal cancer.

Methods

Between 2000 and 2015, a total of 112 consecutive patients with UICC stage I–IV anal cancer received chemoradiotherapy with 5‑fluororuracil and mitomycin C (CRT). In case of insufficient tumor response 4–6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy, patients received an interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy boost. Additionally, 50/112 patients received hyperthermia treatments (HCRT).

Results

Median follow-up was 41 (2–165) months. After 5 years follow-up, overall (95.8 vs. 74.5%, P = 0.045), disease-free (89.1 vs. 70.4%, P = 0.027), local recurrence-free (97.7 vs. 78.7%, P = 0.006), and colostomy-free survival rates (87.7 vs. 69.0%, P = 0.016) were better for the HCRT group. Disease-specific, regional failure-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates showed no significant differences. The adjusted hazard ratios for death were 0.25 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.92; P = 0.036) and for local recurrence 0.14 (95% CI, 0.02 to 1.09; P = 0.06), respectively. Grades 3–4 early toxicities were comparable with the exception of hematotoxicity, which was higher in the HCRT group (66 vs. 43%, P = 0.032). Incidences of late side effects were similar with the exception of a higher telangiectasia rate in the HCRT group (38.0 vs. 16.1%, P = 0.009).

Conclusion

Additional regional hyperthermia improved overall survival, local control, and colostomy rates. Its potential beneficial role has to be confirmed in a prospective randomized setting. Therefore, the HyCAN trial has already been established by our group and is currently recruiting patients (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02369939).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege F et al (1997) Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: Results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol 15:2040–2049CrossRefPubMed Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege F et al (1997) Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: Results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol 15:2040–2049CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Flam M, John M, Pajak TF et al (1996) Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: Results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 14:2527–2539CrossRefPubMed Flam M, John M, Pajak TF et al (1996) Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: Results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 14:2527–2539CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gunderson LL, Winter KA, Ajani JA et al (2012) Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: Survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 30:4344–4351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gunderson LL, Winter KA, Ajani JA et al (2012) Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: Survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 30:4344–4351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Henkenberens C, Meinecke D, Michael S et al (2015) Reduced radiation dose for elective nodal irradiation in node-negative anal cancer: Back to the roots? Strahlenther Onkol 191:845–854CrossRefPubMed Henkenberens C, Meinecke D, Michael S et al (2015) Reduced radiation dose for elective nodal irradiation in node-negative anal cancer: Back to the roots? Strahlenther Onkol 191:845–854CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Issels RD, Lindner LH, Verweij J et al (2010) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with regional hyperthermia for localised high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma: A randomised phase 3 multicentre study. Lancet Oncol 11:561–570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Issels RD, Lindner LH, Verweij J et al (2010) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with regional hyperthermia for localised high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma: A randomised phase 3 multicentre study. Lancet Oncol 11:561–570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference James RD, Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM et al (2013) Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): A randomised, phase 3, open-label, 2 x 2 factorial trial. Lancet Oncol 14:516–524CrossRefPubMed James RD, Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM et al (2013) Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): A randomised, phase 3, open-label, 2 x 2 factorial trial. Lancet Oncol 14:516–524CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jones EL, Oleson JR, Prosnitz LR et al (2005) Randomized trial of hyperthermia and radiation for superficial tumors. J Clin Oncol 23:3079–3085CrossRefPubMed Jones EL, Oleson JR, Prosnitz LR et al (2005) Randomized trial of hyperthermia and radiation for superficial tumors. J Clin Oncol 23:3079–3085CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kouloulias V, Plataniotis G, Kouvaris J et al (2005) Chemoradiotherapy combined with intracavitary hyperthermia for anal cancer: Feasibility and long-term results from a phase II randomized trial. Am J Clin Oncol 28:91–99CrossRefPubMed Kouloulias V, Plataniotis G, Kouvaris J et al (2005) Chemoradiotherapy combined with intracavitary hyperthermia for anal cancer: Feasibility and long-term results from a phase II randomized trial. Am J Clin Oncol 28:91–99CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nigro ND, Seydel HG, Considine B et al (1983) Combined preoperative radiation and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 51:1826–1829CrossRefPubMed Nigro ND, Seydel HG, Considine B et al (1983) Combined preoperative radiation and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 51:1826–1829CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Peiffert D, Tournier-Rangeard L, Gerard JP et al (2012) Induction chemotherapy and dose intensification of the radiation boost in locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: Final analysis of the randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 trial. J Clin Oncol 30:1941–1948CrossRefPubMed Peiffert D, Tournier-Rangeard L, Gerard JP et al (2012) Induction chemotherapy and dose intensification of the radiation boost in locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: Final analysis of the randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 trial. J Clin Oncol 30:1941–1948CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sauter M, Vavricka SR, Keilholz G et al (2017) Surveillance of anal carcinoma after radiochemotherapy : A retrospective analysis of 80 patients. Strahlenther Onkol 193:639–647CrossRefPubMed Sauter M, Vavricka SR, Keilholz G et al (2017) Surveillance of anal carcinoma after radiochemotherapy : A retrospective analysis of 80 patients. Strahlenther Onkol 193:639–647CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Weber HE, Droge LH, Hennies S et al (2015) Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. 3‑dimensional conformal radiotherapy for primary chemoradiotherapy of anal carcinoma: Effects on treatment-related side effects and survival. Strahlenther Onkol 191:827–834CrossRefPubMed Weber HE, Droge LH, Hennies S et al (2015) Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. 3‑dimensional conformal radiotherapy for primary chemoradiotherapy of anal carcinoma: Effects on treatment-related side effects and survival. Strahlenther Onkol 191:827–834CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wittlinger M, Rodel CM, Weiss C et al (2009) Quadrimodal treatment of high-risk T1 and T2 bladder cancer: Transurethral tumor resection followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy and regional deep hyperthermia. Radiother Oncol 93:358–363CrossRefPubMed Wittlinger M, Rodel CM, Weiss C et al (2009) Quadrimodal treatment of high-risk T1 and T2 bladder cancer: Transurethral tumor resection followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy and regional deep hyperthermia. Radiother Oncol 93:358–363CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Chemoradiotherapy with and without deep regional hyperthermia for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus
Authors
Prof. Dr. med. Oliver J. Ott
Dr. Manfred Schmidt
PD Dr. Sabine Semrau
Prof. Dr. Vratislav Strnad
Prof. Dr. Klaus E. Matzel
Prof. Dr. Ignaz Schneider
Dr. Dimitrios Raptis
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Uter
Prof. Dr. Robert Grützmann
Prof. Dr. Rainer Fietkau
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1396-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2019 Go to the issue