Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Cervical Cancer | Research

[18F]FDG-PET/CT-based risk stratification in women with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer

Authors: J.A. Adam, E. Poel, B.L.F. van Eck Smit, C.H. Mom, L.J.A. Stalpers, J.J. Laan, E. Kidd, J. Stoker, S. Bipat

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

[18F]FDG-PET/CT is used for staging and treatment planning in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We studied if a PET-based prediction model could provide additional risk stratification beyond International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging in our population with LACC to aid treatment decision making.

Methods

In total, 183 patients with LACC treated with chemoradiation between 2013 and 2018 were included. Patients were treated according to FIGO 2009 and retrospectively reclassified according to FIGO 2018 staging system. After validation of an existing PET-based prediction model, the predicted recurrent free survival (RFS), disease specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years, based on metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and highest level of [18F]FDG-positive node was calculated. Then the observed survival was compared to the predicted survival. An area under the curve (AUC) close to or higher than 0.7 was considered adequate for accurate prediction. The Youden (J) index defined survival chance cutoff values for low and high risk groups.

Results

All AUC values for the comparison between predicted and observed outcomes were > 0.7 except for 5-year RFS and for 5-year OS which were close to 0.7 (0.684 and 0.650 respectively). Cutoff values for low and high risk survival chance were 0.44 for the 3-year RFS and 0.47 for the 5-year OS. The FIGO 2009 system could not differentiate between the risk profiles. After reclassification according to FIGO 2018, all patients with stage IIIC2 and IVB fell in the high risk and almost all patients with stages IB2-IIIB and IVA in the low risk group. In patients with stage IIIC1 disease the FIGO stage cannot discriminate between the risk profiles.

Conclusions

Low and high risk patients with LACC can be identified with the PET-based prediction model. In particular patients with stage IIIC1 need additional risk stratification besides the FIGO 2018 staging. The Kidd model could be a useful tool to aid treatment decision making in these patients. Our results also support the choice of [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in patients with LACC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRefPubMed Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):107–8.CrossRefPubMed Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):107–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35.CrossRefPubMed Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Corrigendum to. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri [Int J Gynecol Obstet 145(2019) 129–135]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;147(2):279– 80. Corrigendum to. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri [Int J Gynecol Obstet 145(2019) 129–135]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;147(2):279– 80.
6.
go back to reference Choi HJ, Ju W, Myung SK, Kim Y. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(6):1471–9.CrossRefPubMed Choi HJ, Ju W, Myung SK, Kim Y. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(6):1471–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader JS, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Grigsby PW. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(12):2108–13.CrossRefPubMed Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader JS, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Grigsby PW. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(12):2108–13.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Washington CR, Zhao D, Moore KN. FIGO 2009 versus 2018 staging for cervical cancer: a comparative study on prediction of survival based on stage. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(2):e37.CrossRef Washington CR, Zhao D, Moore KN. FIGO 2009 versus 2018 staging for cervical cancer: a comparative study on prediction of survival based on stage. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(2):e37.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kidd EA, El Naqa I, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. FDG-PET-based prognostic nomograms for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(1):136–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kidd EA, El Naqa I, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. FDG-PET-based prognostic nomograms for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(1):136–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Cronin AM. Everything you always wanted to know about evaluating prediction models (but were too afraid to ask). Urology. 2010;76(6):1298–301.CrossRefPubMed Vickers AJ, Cronin AM. Everything you always wanted to know about evaluating prediction models (but were too afraid to ask). Urology. 2010;76(6):1298–301.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Grigsby PW, Perez CA, Chao KS, Herzog T, Mutch DG, Rader J. Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix with biopsy-proven positive para-aortic lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49(3):733–8.CrossRefPubMed Grigsby PW, Perez CA, Chao KS, Herzog T, Mutch DG, Rader J. Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix with biopsy-proven positive para-aortic lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49(3):733–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mutic S, Malyapa RS, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Miller TR, Zoberi I, et al. PET-guided IMRT for cervical carcinoma with positive para-aortic lymph nodes-a dose-escalation treatment planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMed Mutic S, Malyapa RS, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Miller TR, Zoberi I, et al. PET-guided IMRT for cervical carcinoma with positive para-aortic lymph nodes-a dose-escalation treatment planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wright JD, Matsuo K, Huang Y, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Khoury-Collado F, et al. Prognostic performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(1):49–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright JD, Matsuo K, Huang Y, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Khoury-Collado F, et al. Prognostic performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(1):49–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference De Cuypere M, Lovinfosse P, Goffin F, Gennigens C, Rovira R, Duch J, et al. Added value of para-aortic surgical staging compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the external beam radiation field for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: an ONCO-GF study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(5):883–7.CrossRefPubMed De Cuypere M, Lovinfosse P, Goffin F, Gennigens C, Rovira R, Duch J, et al. Added value of para-aortic surgical staging compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the external beam radiation field for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: an ONCO-GF study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(5):883–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Thelissen AAB, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, van der Leij F, Peters M, Gerestein CG, Zweemer RP, van Rossum PSN. Upstaging by para-aortic lymph node dissection in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;164(3):667–74.CrossRefPubMed Thelissen AAB, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, van der Leij F, Peters M, Gerestein CG, Zweemer RP, van Rossum PSN. Upstaging by para-aortic lymph node dissection in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;164(3):667–74.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ramirez PT, Milam MR. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(2 Suppl 1):9–12.CrossRefPubMed Ramirez PT, Milam MR. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(2 Suppl 1):9–12.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Potter R, Tanderup K, Schmid MP, Jurgenliemk-Schulz I, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal LU, et al. MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):538–47.CrossRefPubMed Potter R, Tanderup K, Schmid MP, Jurgenliemk-Schulz I, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal LU, et al. MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):538–47.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Culverwell AD, Scarsbrook AF, Chowdhury FU. False-positive uptake on 2-[(1)(8)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in oncological imaging. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(4):366–82.CrossRefPubMed Culverwell AD, Scarsbrook AF, Chowdhury FU. False-positive uptake on 2-[(1)(8)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in oncological imaging. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(4):366–82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Crezee MIJ, Oei J, Stalpers AL, Westerveld LJA. H. The role of hyperthermia in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a comprehensive review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022. Crezee MIJ, Oei J, Stalpers AL, Westerveld LJA. H. The role of hyperthermia in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a comprehensive review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022.
21.
go back to reference Miller TR, Grigsby PW. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53(2):353–9.CrossRefPubMed Miller TR, Grigsby PW. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53(2):353–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Anderson CM, Sun W, Buatti JM, Maley JE, Policeni B, Mott SL, Bayouth JE. Interobserver and intermodality variability in GTV delineation on simulation CT, FDG-PET, and MR images of Head and Neck Cancer. Jacobs J Radiat Oncol. 2014;1(1):006.PubMedPubMedCentral Anderson CM, Sun W, Buatti JM, Maley JE, Policeni B, Mott SL, Bayouth JE. Interobserver and intermodality variability in GTV delineation on simulation CT, FDG-PET, and MR images of Head and Neck Cancer. Jacobs J Radiat Oncol. 2014;1(1):006.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315–6.CrossRefPubMed Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hosmer DW. SL. Applied Logistic Regression, second edition: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000. Hosmer DW. SL. Applied Logistic Regression, second edition: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000.
25.
27.
go back to reference Thiele C, Hirschfeld G. Cutpointr: Improved Estimation and Validation of Optimal cutpoints in R. J Stat Softw. 2021;98(11):1–27.CrossRef Thiele C, Hirschfeld G. Cutpointr: Improved Estimation and Validation of Optimal cutpoints in R. J Stat Softw. 2021;98(11):1–27.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute Surveillance EaERP. Cancer Stat Facts: Cervical Cancer. 2017. National Cancer Institute Surveillance EaERP. Cancer Stat Facts: Cervical Cancer. 2017.
29.
go back to reference Lora D, de la Gomez A, Fernandez SP, Enriquez de Salamanca R, Gomez J. Prognostic models for locally advanced cervical cancer: external validation of the published models. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(5):e58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lora D, de la Gomez A, Fernandez SP, Enriquez de Salamanca R, Gomez J. Prognostic models for locally advanced cervical cancer: external validation of the published models. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(5):e58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Adam JA, van Diepen PR, Mom CH, Stoker J, van Eck-Smit BLF, Bipat S. [(18)F]FDG-PET or PET/CT in the evaluation of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(2):588–96.CrossRefPubMed Adam JA, van Diepen PR, Mom CH, Stoker J, van Eck-Smit BLF, Bipat S. [(18)F]FDG-PET or PET/CT in the evaluation of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(2):588–96.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Collins GS, Ogundimu EO, Altman DG. Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study. Stat Med. 2016;35(2):214–26.CrossRefPubMed Collins GS, Ogundimu EO, Altman DG. Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study. Stat Med. 2016;35(2):214–26.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Farley JH, Hickey KW, Carlson JW, Rose GS, Kost ER, Harrison TA. Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97(9):2196–202.CrossRefPubMed Farley JH, Hickey KW, Carlson JW, Rose GS, Kost ER, Harrison TA. Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97(9):2196–202.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
[18F]FDG-PET/CT-based risk stratification in women with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer
Authors
J.A. Adam
E. Poel
B.L.F. van Eck Smit
C.H. Mom
L.J.A. Stalpers
J.J. Laan
E. Kidd
J. Stoker
S. Bipat
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12232-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Cancer 1/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine