Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019

01-11-2019 | Breast Cancer | Preclinical study

Plasma cell-free DNA chromosomal instability analysis by low-pass whole-genome sequencing to monitor breast cancer relapse

Authors: Huanhuan Zhou, Xiao-Jia Wang, Xiyi Jiang, Ziliang Qian, Tianhui Chen, Yue Hu, Zhan-Hong Chen, Yun Gao, Rong Wang, Wei-Wu Ye, Wen-Ming Cao

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chromosomal instabilities (CIN) of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are common in breast cancer. We aimed to investigate the value of cfDNA CIN in monitoring the breast cancer relapse and additionally to compare it with the traditional biomarkers (CA15-3 and CEA).

Methods

Overall 62 recurrent breast cancer patients and 20 healthy controls were recruited. Low-pass whole-genome sequencing (LPWGS) was performed to detect cfDNA CIN. A CIN score was calculated. The performance of CA15-3, CEA, and CIN score in monitoring the recurrence was investigated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under curve (AUC). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was established to analyze the correlations between copy number gain/loss and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

cfDNA CIN achieved the positive rate of 77.6% [(95% confidence interval (CI) 73.4–95.3%)] among recurrent breast cancer patients, with an AUC value of 0.933, superior to CA15-3 (positive rate: 38.7%; AUC: 0.864) and CEA (positive rate: 41.93%; AUC: 0.878) (P < 0.01). The combination of cfDNA CIN with two biomarkers further increased the positive rate to 88.7% (95% confidence interval 77.5–95.0%). cfDNA CIN achieved better performance in patients with shorter DFS (≤ 41 months), with an AUC value of 0.975.

Conclusions

cfDNA CIN yields a higher accuracy in monitoring breast cancer recurrence compared to traditional biomarkers (CA15-3 and CEA), especially for biomarker-negative patients. The combination of cfDNA CIN to traditional biomarkers further improved the detection rate of recurrence, which may provide a new method for monitoring the early relapse of breast cancer, though further investigations are warranted.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA 68(6):394–424PubMed Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA 68(6):394–424PubMed
3.
go back to reference Lacey H, Judith H (2015) MUC1-mediated motility in breast cancer: a review highlighting the role of the MUC1/ICAM-1/Src signaling triad. Clin Exp Metastasis 32(4):393–403CrossRef Lacey H, Judith H (2015) MUC1-mediated motility in breast cancer: a review highlighting the role of the MUC1/ICAM-1/Src signaling triad. Clin Exp Metastasis 32(4):393–403CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Murtaza M, Biggs H (2013) Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 368(13):1199–1209PubMedCrossRef Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Murtaza M, Biggs H (2013) Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 368(13):1199–1209PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guadagni F, Ferroni P, Carlini S, Mariotti S, Spila A, Aloe S, D’Alessandro R, Carone MD, Cicchetti A, Ricciotti A (2001) A re-evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a serum marker for breast cancer: a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Cancer Res 7(8):2357–2362PubMed Guadagni F, Ferroni P, Carlini S, Mariotti S, Spila A, Aloe S, D’Alessandro R, Carone MD, Cicchetti A, Ricciotti A (2001) A re-evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a serum marker for breast cancer: a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Cancer Res 7(8):2357–2362PubMed
6.
go back to reference Aguiar-Bujanda D, Bohn-Sarmiento U, Aguiar-Morales J (2004) False elevation of serum CA 15-3 levels in patients under follow-up for breast cancer. Breast J 10(4):375–376PubMedCrossRef Aguiar-Bujanda D, Bohn-Sarmiento U, Aguiar-Morales J (2004) False elevation of serum CA 15-3 levels in patients under follow-up for breast cancer. Breast J 10(4):375–376PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gioia D, Di Stieber P, Schmidt GP, Nagel D, Heinemann V, Baur-Melnyk A (2015) Early detection of metastatic disease in asymptomatic breast cancer patients with whole-body imaging and defined tumour marker increase. Breast Dis 112(5):809–818 Gioia D, Di Stieber P, Schmidt GP, Nagel D, Heinemann V, Baur-Melnyk A (2015) Early detection of metastatic disease in asymptomatic breast cancer patients with whole-body imaging and defined tumour marker increase. Breast Dis 112(5):809–818
10.
go back to reference Network TCGA (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature 490(7418):61–70CrossRef Network TCGA (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature 490(7418):61–70CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Knouse KA, Davoli T, Elledge SJ, Amon A (2017) Aneuploidy in cancer: seq-ing answers to old questions. Annu Rev Cancer Biol 1(1):335–354CrossRef Knouse KA, Davoli T, Elledge SJ, Amon A (2017) Aneuploidy in cancer: seq-ing answers to old questions. Annu Rev Cancer Biol 1(1):335–354CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goh JY, Feng M, Wang W, Oguz G, Smjm Y, Lee PL, Bao Y, Lim TH, Wang P, Tam WL (2017) Chromosome 1q21.3 amplification is a trackable biomarker and actionable target for breast cancer recurrence. Nat Med 23(11):1319PubMedCrossRef Goh JY, Feng M, Wang W, Oguz G, Smjm Y, Lee PL, Bao Y, Lim TH, Wang P, Tam WL (2017) Chromosome 1q21.3 amplification is a trackable biomarker and actionable target for breast cancer recurrence. Nat Med 23(11):1319PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stover DG, Parsons HA, Ha G, Freeman SS, Barry WT, Guo H, Choudhury AD, Gydush G, Reed SC, Rhoades J (2018) Association of cell-free DNA tumor fraction and somatic copy number alterations with survival in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 36(6):543–553PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Stover DG, Parsons HA, Ha G, Freeman SS, Barry WT, Guo H, Choudhury AD, Gydush G, Reed SC, Rhoades J (2018) Association of cell-free DNA tumor fraction and somatic copy number alterations with survival in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 36(6):543–553PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Peiyong J, Chan CWM, Chan KCA, Suk Hang C, John W, Vincent Wai-Sun W, Wong GLH, Chan SL, Mok TSK, Chan HLY (2015) Lengthening and shortening of plasma DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(11):E1317CrossRef Peiyong J, Chan CWM, Chan KCA, Suk Hang C, John W, Vincent Wai-Sun W, Wong GLH, Chan SL, Mok TSK, Chan HLY (2015) Lengthening and shortening of plasma DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(11):E1317CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Adalsteinsson VA, Ha G, Freeman SS, Choudhury AD, Stover DG, Parsons HA, Gydush G, Reed SC, Rotem D, Rhoades J (2017) Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors. Nat Commun 8(1):1324PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Adalsteinsson VA, Ha G, Freeman SS, Choudhury AD, Stover DG, Parsons HA, Gydush G, Reed SC, Rotem D, Rhoades J (2017) Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors. Nat Commun 8(1):1324PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform 12:1–8CrossRef Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform 12:1–8CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Morenobetancur M, Sadaoui H, Piffaretti C, Rey G (2017) Survival analysis with multiple causes of death. Epidemiology 28(1):12CrossRef Morenobetancur M, Sadaoui H, Piffaretti C, Rey G (2017) Survival analysis with multiple causes of death. Epidemiology 28(1):12CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Razavi P, Chang MT, Xu G, Bandlamudi C, Ross DS, Vasan N, Cai Y, Bielski CM, Donoghue MTA, Jonsson P, Penson A, Shen R, Pareja F, Kundra R, Middha S, Cheng ML, Zehir A, Kandoth C, Patel R, Huberman K, Smyth LM, Jhaveri K, Modi S, Traina TA, Dang C, Zhang W, Weigelt B, Li BT, Ladanyi M, Hyman DM, Schultz N, Robson ME, Hudis C, Brogi E, Viale A, Norton L, Dickler MN, Berger MF, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Chandarlapaty S, Scaltriti M, Reis-Filho JS, Solit DB, Taylor BS, Baselga J (2018) The genomic landscape of endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancers. Cancer Cell 34(3):427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.008 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Razavi P, Chang MT, Xu G, Bandlamudi C, Ross DS, Vasan N, Cai Y, Bielski CM, Donoghue MTA, Jonsson P, Penson A, Shen R, Pareja F, Kundra R, Middha S, Cheng ML, Zehir A, Kandoth C, Patel R, Huberman K, Smyth LM, Jhaveri K, Modi S, Traina TA, Dang C, Zhang W, Weigelt B, Li BT, Ladanyi M, Hyman DM, Schultz N, Robson ME, Hudis C, Brogi E, Viale A, Norton L, Dickler MN, Berger MF, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Chandarlapaty S, Scaltriti M, Reis-Filho JS, Solit DB, Taylor BS, Baselga J (2018) The genomic landscape of endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancers. Cancer Cell 34(3):427–438. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ccell.​2018.​08.​008 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kjaer IM, Bechmann T, Brandslund I, Madsen JS (2017) Prognostic and predictive value of EGFR and EGFR-ligands in blood of breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Clin Chem Lab Med 56(5):688–701CrossRef Kjaer IM, Bechmann T, Brandslund I, Madsen JS (2017) Prognostic and predictive value of EGFR and EGFR-ligands in blood of breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Clin Chem Lab Med 56(5):688–701CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Beardsley DI, Kowbel D, Lataxes TA, Mannino JM, Xin H, Kim WJ, Collins C, Brown KD (2003) Characterization of the novel amplified in breast cancer-1 (NABC1) gene product. Exp Cell Res 290:402–413PubMedCrossRef Beardsley DI, Kowbel D, Lataxes TA, Mannino JM, Xin H, Kim WJ, Collins C, Brown KD (2003) Characterization of the novel amplified in breast cancer-1 (NABC1) gene product. Exp Cell Res 290:402–413PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ramaiah MJ, Vaishnave S (2018) BMI1 and PTEN are key determinants of breast cancer therapy: a plausible therapeutic target in breast cancer. Gene 678:302–311CrossRef Ramaiah MJ, Vaishnave S (2018) BMI1 and PTEN are key determinants of breast cancer therapy: a plausible therapeutic target in breast cancer. Gene 678:302–311CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rivand M, Khorrami MS, Fiuji H, Shahidsales S, Hasanzadeh M, Jazayeri MH, Hassanian SM, Ferns GA, Saghafi N, Avan A (2017) The 9p21 locus: a potential therapeutic target and prognostic marker in breast cancer. J Cell Physiol 233(7):5170–5179CrossRef Rivand M, Khorrami MS, Fiuji H, Shahidsales S, Hasanzadeh M, Jazayeri MH, Hassanian SM, Ferns GA, Saghafi N, Avan A (2017) The 9p21 locus: a potential therapeutic target and prognostic marker in breast cancer. J Cell Physiol 233(7):5170–5179CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Johnson J, Thijssen B, Mcdermott U, Garnett M, Wessels LFA, Bernards R (2016) Targeting the RB-E2F pathway in breast cancer. Oncogene 35(37):4829–4835PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Johnson J, Thijssen B, Mcdermott U, Garnett M, Wessels LFA, Bernards R (2016) Targeting the RB-E2F pathway in breast cancer. Oncogene 35(37):4829–4835PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schon K, Tischkowitz M (2018) Clinical implications of germline mutations in breast cancer: TP53. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167(2):417–423PubMedCrossRef Schon K, Tischkowitz M (2018) Clinical implications of germline mutations in breast cancer: TP53. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167(2):417–423PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chen WZ, Shen JF, Zhou Y, Chen XY, Liu JM, Liu ZL (2017) Clinical characteristics and risk factors for developing bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Sci Rep 7(1):11325PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen WZ, Shen JF, Zhou Y, Chen XY, Liu JM, Liu ZL (2017) Clinical characteristics and risk factors for developing bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Sci Rep 7(1):11325PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Li X, Dai D, Chen B, Tang H, Xie X, Wei W (2018) Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of cancer antigen 15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen in breast cancer: a meta-analysis including 12,993 patients. Dis Markers 2018:1–15 Li X, Dai D, Chen B, Tang H, Xie X, Wei W (2018) Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of cancer antigen 15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen in breast cancer: a meta-analysis including 12,993 patients. Dis Markers 2018:1–15
28.
go back to reference Sandri MT, Salvatici M, Botteri E, Passerini R, Zorzino L, Rotmensz N (2012) Prognostic role of CA15.3 in 7942 patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(1):317–326PubMedCrossRef Sandri MT, Salvatici M, Botteri E, Passerini R, Zorzino L, Rotmensz N (2012) Prognostic role of CA15.3 in 7942 patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(1):317–326PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Marcel S, Marlous H, Sieuwerts AM, Stefan S, Yi Z, Yixin W, Foekens JA, Martens JWM (2011) Patterns and incidence of chromosomal instability and their prognostic relevance in breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128(1):23–30CrossRef Marcel S, Marlous H, Sieuwerts AM, Stefan S, Yi Z, Yixin W, Foekens JA, Martens JWM (2011) Patterns and incidence of chromosomal instability and their prognostic relevance in breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128(1):23–30CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Toy W, Shen Y, Won H, Green B, Sakr RA, Will M, Li Z, Gala K, Fanning S, King TA (2013) ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer. Nat Genet 45(12):1439PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Toy W, Shen Y, Won H, Green B, Sakr RA, Will M, Li Z, Gala K, Fanning S, King TA (2013) ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer. Nat Genet 45(12):1439PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Babina IS, Turner NC (2017) Advances and challenges in targeting FGFR signalling in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 17(5):318PubMedCrossRef Babina IS, Turner NC (2017) Advances and challenges in targeting FGFR signalling in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 17(5):318PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Nicholas T, Alex P, Rachel S, Maryou L, Felipe G, Lopez-Garcia MA, Rachael N, Caterina M, Elizabeth I, Alan M (2010) FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer Res 70(5):2085CrossRef Nicholas T, Alex P, Rachel S, Maryou L, Felipe G, Lopez-Garcia MA, Rachael N, Caterina M, Elizabeth I, Alan M (2010) FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer Res 70(5):2085CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Boehm JS, Zhao JJ, Jun Y, So Young K, Ron F, Dunn IF, Sjostrom SK, Garraway LA, Stanislawa W, Richardson AL (2007) Integrative genomic approaches identify IKBKE as a breast cancer oncogene. Cell 129(6):1065–1079CrossRef Boehm JS, Zhao JJ, Jun Y, So Young K, Ron F, Dunn IF, Sjostrom SK, Garraway LA, Stanislawa W, Richardson AL (2007) Integrative genomic approaches identify IKBKE as a breast cancer oncogene. Cell 129(6):1065–1079CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Plasma cell-free DNA chromosomal instability analysis by low-pass whole-genome sequencing to monitor breast cancer relapse
Authors
Huanhuan Zhou
Xiao-Jia Wang
Xiyi Jiang
Ziliang Qian
Tianhui Chen
Yue Hu
Zhan-Hong Chen
Yun Gao
Rong Wang
Wei-Wu Ye
Wen-Ming Cao
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05375-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine