Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 5/2024

29-01-2024 | Bisphosphonate | Letter to the Editor

Predictors of atypical femoral fractures: experience of a Portuguese Fracture Liaison Service

Authors: F. Cunha-Santos, D. Augusto, A. S. Pinto, S. P. Dinis, N. Madeira, C. Vaz, J. F. Ferreira

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Excerpt

Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) have gained recent attention due to their distinct characteristics, notably their predominant occurrence in the subtrochanteric region and association with prolonged bisphosphonates (BP) use – a frequently prescribed anti-osteoporotic medication [1, 2]. Despite their rarity, it is crucial for physicians to remain vigilant and recognise this clinical entity [3]. This report shares the experience of our Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) in addressing AFF. Our objective was to investigate the prevalence of AFF among hip fracture patients and identify associated factors. This is a retrospective case–control study, including patients over 50 years, who underwent hip fracture surgery and were observed at our FLS between September 2019 and January 2023. We classified fracture radiographs and compared demographic, clinical, biochemical features and BP purchase data between patients with AFF and those with typical osteoporotic fracture (TOF), as controls. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted using SPSS© version 29 and p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. A total of 109 patients (9 AFF and 100 TOF) were included. Table 1 presents the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the included patients. Patients with AFF were younger (AFF: 71.0 ± 8.8 vs. TOF: 78.3 ± 8.6 years, p = 0.008), with a similar female sex distribution (AFF: 77.8% vs TOF: 84.0%, p = 0.457). AFF patients exhibited a higher body mass index (BMI) (AFF: 28.5 ± 5.2 vs. TOF: 24.8 ± 4.5 kg/m2, p = 0.023) and a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (AFF: 88.7 ± 19.3 vs. TOF: 70.9 ± 21.7 mg/dL, p = 0.027). Additionally, a significantly higher proportion had received BP treatment (77.8% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the BP treatment duration, haemoglobin levels, Charlson’s Comorbidity Index, or the use of proton pump inhibitors, corticosteroids, anti-depressants or statins. Multivariate logistic regression analysis [X2 (4) 29.2, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.604] identified previous BP treatment and higher BMI as predictors of atypical femoral fracture (p = 0.006 and p = 0.017, respectively). Odds ratio (OR) for previous BP treatment was 58.2 (95% CI 3.1–1086.1) and, for higher BMI, it was 1.4 (95% CI 1.1–1.8). While deemed uncommon, our study revealed that 8.3% of femoral fracture patients experienced AFF, surpassing prevalence rates reported in earlier studies [4, 5]. Furthermore, our findings affirm the association between long-term BP use and AFF, echoing previous research [5, 6]. Importantly, we contribute to the growing evidence linking a higher BMI with an increased risk of AFF. Acknowledging limitations, including a small sample size and single-centre data, our work emphasizes the necessity for vigilance in recognising AFF and provides valuable insights into associated risk factors.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of included patients according to type of fracture
 
Atypical femoral fractures
(n = 9)
Typical osteoporotic fracture (n = 100)
p value
Age (years), mean ± SD
71.0 ± 8.8
78.3 ± 8.6
0.017
Sex, female n (%)
7 (77.8)
84 (84.0)
0.46
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD
28.5 ± 5.2
24.8 ± 4.5
0.023
eGFR (mg/dL), mean ± SD
88.7 ± 19.3
70.9 ± 21.7
0.027
Hb (gr/dL), mean ± SD
12.8 ± 0.9
12.7 ± 1.9
0.80
CCI, mean ± SD
3.6 ± 1.2
4.4 ± 1.7
0.07
Use of BP, n (%)
7 (77.8)
14 (14.0)
 < 0.001
BP treatment duration (years), mean ± SD
6.4 ± 3.3
4.3 ± 2.9
0.16
Medication, n (%)
  PPIs
7 (77.8)
54 (54.0)
0.29
  Corticosteroids
2 (22.2)
6 (6.0)
0.15
  Anti-depressants
0 (0.0)
24 (24.0)
0.20
  Statins
3 (33.3)
47 (47.0)
0.51
BMI Body mass index, BP bisphosphonate, CCI Charlson’s Comorbidity Index, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, Hb Haemoglobin, n number, PPI proton pump inhibitors, SD standard deviation
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wang Z, Ward MM, Chan L, Bhattacharyya T (2014) Adherence to oral bisphosphonates and the risk of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures among female medicare beneficiaries. Osteoporos Int 25:2109–2116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang Z, Ward MM, Chan L, Bhattacharyya T (2014) Adherence to oral bisphosphonates and the risk of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures among female medicare beneficiaries. Osteoporos Int 25:2109–2116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Park-Wyllie LY, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN, Hawker GA, Gunraj N, Austin PC, Whelan DB, Weiler PJ, Laupacis A (2011) Bisphosphonate use and the risk of subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures in older women. JAMA 305:783–789CrossRefPubMed Park-Wyllie LY, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN, Hawker GA, Gunraj N, Austin PC, Whelan DB, Weiler PJ, Laupacis A (2011) Bisphosphonate use and the risk of subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures in older women. JAMA 305:783–789CrossRefPubMed
3.
6.
go back to reference Franceschetti P, Bondanelli M, Caruso G et al (2013) Risk factors for development of atypical femoral fractures in patients on long-term oral bisphosphonate therapy. Bone 56:426–431CrossRefPubMed Franceschetti P, Bondanelli M, Caruso G et al (2013) Risk factors for development of atypical femoral fractures in patients on long-term oral bisphosphonate therapy. Bone 56:426–431CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictors of atypical femoral fractures: experience of a Portuguese Fracture Liaison Service
Authors
F. Cunha-Santos
D. Augusto
A. S. Pinto
S. P. Dinis
N. Madeira
C. Vaz
J. F. Ferreira
Publication date
29-01-2024
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07033-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Osteoporosis International 5/2024 Go to the issue