Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Implant Dentistry 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research

Biomechanical behavior of three different types of internal tapered connections after cyclic and static loading tests: experimental in vitro

Authors: Marcos Boaventura de Moura, Karine Regina Tolesano Loureiro, Livia Bonjardim Lima, Christian Felippi, Paulo Cézar Simamoto Júnior

Published in: International Journal of Implant Dentistry | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the long-term success of a dental implant, the reliability and stability of the implant-abutment interface are important. Studies of maximum force of dental implants with different loading values have been used. This study aims to evaluate the influence of the oblique cyclic loading on the maximum force supported in one-piece and two-piece abutments installed on internal tapered implants.

Findings

Sixty implants and sixty prosthetic abutments were divided into six groups (n = 10): G1 and G2 (two-piece abutments with 16°), G3 and G4 (two-piece abutments with 11.5°), and G5 and G6 (one-piece abutments with 11.5°). A 2-Hz cyclic loading was applied to specimens of G2, G4, and G6, with a number of cycles of 2,400,000. All specimens were inclined by 30° from the vertical axis, and a vertical loading was applied over the tapered connections (ISO 14801). Then, the maximum force was tested by applying a static compression load on the specimens of the 6 groups tested (30°) at a rate of 0.5 mm/s. Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk (p > 0.05) and Levene (p = 0.789) tests to determine if the data presented homoscedasticity and the Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Tukey test showed that the maximum force supported by G1 and G2 was not affected by the cyclic load, while in G3 and G4 it decreased significantly when subjected to the cyclic load. The G5 and G6 had a significant increase in maximum force supported when subjected to cyclic load.

Conclusions

Cyclic loading influenced the maximum force supported of G4 and G6 but did not influence G2.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Möllersten L, Lockowandt P, Lindén LA. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:582–91.CrossRef Möllersten L, Lockowandt P, Lindén LA. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:582–91.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference de Moura MB, Rodrigues RB, Pinto LM, de Araújo CA, Novais VR, Júnior PCS. Influence of screw surface treatment on retention of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43:254–60.CrossRef de Moura MB, Rodrigues RB, Pinto LM, de Araújo CA, Novais VR, Júnior PCS. Influence of screw surface treatment on retention of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43:254–60.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mattheos N, Li X, Zampelis A, Ma L, Janda M. Investigating the micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction and their clinical implications: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:e134–43.CrossRef Mattheos N, Li X, Zampelis A, Ma L, Janda M. Investigating the micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction and their clinical implications: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:e134–43.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ugurel CS, Steiner M, Isik-Ozkol G, Kutay O, Kern M. Mechanical resistance of screwless Morse taper and screw-retained implant-abutment connections. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:137–42.CrossRef Ugurel CS, Steiner M, Isik-Ozkol G, Kutay O, Kern M. Mechanical resistance of screwless Morse taper and screw-retained implant-abutment connections. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:137–42.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bozkaya D, Müftü S. Mechanics of the taper integrated screwed-in (TIS) abutments used in dental implants. J Biomech. 2005;38:87–97.CrossRef Bozkaya D, Müftü S. Mechanics of the taper integrated screwed-in (TIS) abutments used in dental implants. J Biomech. 2005;38:87–97.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jorge JR, Barao VA, Delben JA, Assuncao WG. The role of implant/abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:415–22.CrossRef Jorge JR, Barao VA, Delben JA, Assuncao WG. The role of implant/abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:415–22.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y. Influence of lateral-oblique cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of internal and external hexagon implants. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:373–81.CrossRef Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y. Influence of lateral-oblique cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of internal and external hexagon implants. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:373–81.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ricciardi Coppedê A, de Mattos MG, Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro RF. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:624–32.PubMed Ricciardi Coppedê A, de Mattos MG, Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro RF. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:624–32.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Jo JY, Yang DS, Huh JB, Heo JC, Yun MJ, Jeong CM. Influence of abutment materials on the implant-abutment joint stability in internal conical connection type implant systems. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:491–7.CrossRef Jo JY, Yang DS, Huh JB, Heo JC, Yun MJ, Jeong CM. Influence of abutment materials on the implant-abutment joint stability in internal conical connection type implant systems. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:491–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Messias A, Rocha S, Calha N, Neto MA, Nicolau P, Guerra F. Effect of intentional abutment disconnection on the micro-movements of the implant-abutment assembly: a 3D digital image correlation analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:9–16.CrossRef Messias A, Rocha S, Calha N, Neto MA, Nicolau P, Guerra F. Effect of intentional abutment disconnection on the micro-movements of the implant-abutment assembly: a 3D digital image correlation analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:9–16.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Herbst PE, de Carvalho EB, Salatti RC, Valgas L, Tiossi R. Influence of different screw torque levels on the biomechanical behavior of tapered prosthetic abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33:536–40.CrossRef Herbst PE, de Carvalho EB, Salatti RC, Valgas L, Tiossi R. Influence of different screw torque levels on the biomechanical behavior of tapered prosthetic abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33:536–40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schmitt CM, Nogueira-Filho G, Tenenbaum HC, et al. Performance of conical abutment (Morse taper) connection implants: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:552–74.CrossRef Schmitt CM, Nogueira-Filho G, Tenenbaum HC, et al. Performance of conical abutment (Morse taper) connection implants: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:552–74.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee CK, Karl M, Kelly JR. Evaluation of test protocol variables for dental implant fatigue research. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1419–25.CrossRef Lee CK, Karl M, Kelly JR. Evaluation of test protocol variables for dental implant fatigue research. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1419–25.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shemtov-Yona K, Rittel D, Levin L, Machtei EE. Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part I: mechanical behavior. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:172–7.CrossRef Shemtov-Yona K, Rittel D, Levin L, Machtei EE. Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part I: mechanical behavior. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:172–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Carneiro Tde A, Dietrich L, Prudente MS, et al. Fracture resistance of internal conical and external hexagon: regular and narrow implant-abutment assemblies. Implant Dent. 2016;25:510–4.CrossRef Carneiro Tde A, Dietrich L, Prudente MS, et al. Fracture resistance of internal conical and external hexagon: regular and narrow implant-abutment assemblies. Implant Dent. 2016;25:510–4.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Perriard J, Wiskott WA, Mellal A, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC. Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors -- a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:542–9.CrossRef Perriard J, Wiskott WA, Mellal A, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC. Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors -- a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:542–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Zanotti G, Tartaglia GM. Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent. 2004;32:451–7.CrossRef Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Zanotti G, Tartaglia GM. Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent. 2004;32:451–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pontius O, Nathanson D, Giordano R, Schilder H, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J Endod. 2002;28:710–5.CrossRef Pontius O, Nathanson D, Giordano R, Schilder H, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J Endod. 2002;28:710–5.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:143–52.CrossRef Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:143–52.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cehreli MC, Iplikçioglu H. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures. Implant Dent. 2002;11:286–92.CrossRef Cehreli MC, Iplikçioglu H. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures. Implant Dent. 2002;11:286–92.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH, Gilmour WH. The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:681–6.CrossRef Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH, Gilmour WH. The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:681–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Oliveira LC, Duarte S Jr, Araujo CA, Abrahão A. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations. Dent Mater. 2010;26:159–69.CrossRef Oliveira LC, Duarte S Jr, Araujo CA, Abrahão A. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations. Dent Mater. 2010;26:159–69.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Biomechanical behavior of three different types of internal tapered connections after cyclic and static loading tests: experimental in vitro
Authors
Marcos Boaventura de Moura
Karine Regina Tolesano Loureiro
Livia Bonjardim Lima
Christian Felippi
Paulo Cézar Simamoto Júnior
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Implant Dentistry / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2198-4034
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00228-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Journal of Implant Dentistry 1/2020 Go to the issue