Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Biomarkers | Statement

ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers

Author: European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Medical imaging capable of generating imaging biomarkers, specifically radiology and nuclear medicine image acquisition and analysis processes, differs from frequently used comparators like blood or urine biomarkers. This difference arises from the sample acquisition methodology. While different analysis methodologies and equipment provide slightly different results in any analytical domain, unlike blood or urine analysis where the samples are obtained by simple extraction or excretion, in radiology the acquisition of the sample is heterogeneous by design, since complex equipment from different vendors is used. Therefore, with this additional degree of freedom in medical imaging, there is still risk of persistent heterogeneity of image quality through time, due to different technological implementations across vendors and protocols used in different centres. Quantitative imaging biomarkers have yet to demonstrate an impact on clinical practice due to this lack of comprehensive standardisation in terms of technical aspects of image acquisition, analysis algorithms, processes and clinical validation.
The aim is establishing a standard methodology based on metrology for the validation of image acquisition and analysis methods used in the extraction of biomarkers and radiomics data. The appropriate implementation of the guidelines herein proposed by radiology departments, research institutes and industry will allow for a significant reduction in inter-vendor & inter-centre variability in imaging biomarkers and determine the measurement error obtained, enabling them to be used in imaging-based criteria for diagnosis, prognosis or treatment response, ultimately improving clinical workflows and patient care. The validation of developed analytical methods must be based on a technical performance validation and clinical validation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2013) ESR statement on the stepwise development of imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 4:147–152CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2013) ESR statement on the stepwise development of imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 4:147–152CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Martí Bonmatí L, Alberich-Bayarri A, García-Martí G et al (2012) Imaging biomarkers, quantitative imaging, and bioengineering. Radiologia 54:269–278 Martí Bonmatí L, Alberich-Bayarri A, García-Martí G et al (2012) Imaging biomarkers, quantitative imaging, and bioengineering. Radiologia 54:269–278
3.
go back to reference Sullivan DC, Obuchowski NA, Kessler LG et al (2015) Metrology Standards for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers. Radiology 277:813–825 Sullivan DC, Obuchowski NA, Kessler LG et al (2015) Metrology Standards for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers. Radiology 277:813–825
4.
go back to reference QIBA. QIBA key criteria for identifying biomarker opportunities: Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance, Chicago, 2009. QIBA. QIBA key criteria for identifying biomarker opportunities: Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance, Chicago, 2009.
6.
go back to reference Alberich-Bayarri A, Neri E, Martí-Bonmatí L (2019) Imaging biomarkers and imaging biobanks. In: Ranschaert E, Morozov S, Algra P (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Opportunities, Applications and Risks. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94878-2 Alberich-Bayarri A, Neri E, Martí-Bonmatí L (2019) Imaging biomarkers and imaging biobanks. In: Ranschaert E, Morozov S, Algra P (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Opportunities, Applications and Risks. Springer Nature. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-94878-2
7.
go back to reference Kaalep A, Huisman M, Sera T, Vugts D, Boellaard R (2018) Feasibility of PET/CT system performance harmonization for quantitative multicenter (89) Zr studies. EJNMMI Phys 21(5):26 Kaalep A, Huisman M, Sera T, Vugts D, Boellaard R (2018) Feasibility of PET/CT system performance harmonization for quantitative multicenter (89) Zr studies. EJNMMI Phys 21(5):26
Metadata
Title
ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers
Author
European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Biomarkers
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00872-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Insights into Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue