Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Artificial Intelligence | Original Article

Attitudes and perceptions of UK medical students towards artificial intelligence and radiology: a multicentre survey

Authors: Cherry Sit, Rohit Srinivasan, Ashik Amlani, Keerthini Muthuswamy, Aishah Azam, Leo Monzon, Daniel Stephen Poon

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To explore the attitudes of United Kingdom (UK) medical students regarding artificial intelligence (AI), their understanding, and career intention towards radiology. We also examine the state of education relating to AI amongst this cohort.

Methods

UK medical students were invited to complete an anonymous electronic survey consisting of Likert and dichotomous questions.

Results

Four hundred eighty-four responses were received from 19 UK medical schools. Eighty-eight percent of students believed that AI will play an important role in healthcare, and 49% reported they were less likely to consider a career in radiology due to AI. Eighty-nine percent of students believed that teaching in AI would be beneficial for their careers, and 78% agreed that students should receive training in AI as part of their medical degree. Only 45 students received any teaching on AI; none of the students received such teaching as part of their compulsory curriculum. Statistically, students that did receive teaching in AI were more likely to consider radiology (p = 0.01) and rated more positively to the questions relating to the perceived competence in the post-graduation use of AI (p = 0.01–0.04); despite this, a large proportion of students in the taught group reported a lack of confidence and understanding required for the critical use of healthcare AI tools.

Conclusions

UK medical students understand the importance of AI and are keen to engage. Medical school training on AI should be expanded and improved. Realistic use cases and limitations of AI must be presented to students so they will not feel discouraged from pursuing radiology.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Annarumma M, Withey SJ, Bakewell RJ, Pesce E, Goh V, Montana G (2019) Automated triaging of adult chest radiographs with deep artificial neural networks. Radiology 291:196–202CrossRef Annarumma M, Withey SJ, Bakewell RJ, Pesce E, Goh V, Montana G (2019) Automated triaging of adult chest radiographs with deep artificial neural networks. Radiology 291:196–202CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rajpurkar P, Irvin J, Ball EL et al (2018) Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists. PLoS Med 15:e1002686CrossRef Rajpurkar P, Irvin J, Ball EL et al (2018) Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists. PLoS Med 15:e1002686CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S et al (2018) Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet 392:2388–2396CrossRef Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S et al (2018) Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet 392:2388–2396CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ting DSW, Pasquale LR, Peng L et al (2019) Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthamol 103:167–175CrossRef Ting DSW, Pasquale LR, Peng L et al (2019) Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthamol 103:167–175CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Niazi MKK, Parwani AV, Gurcan MN (2019) Digital pathology and artificial intelligence. Lancet Oncol 20:253–261CrossRef Niazi MKK, Parwani AV, Gurcan MN (2019) Digital pathology and artificial intelligence. Lancet Oncol 20:253–261CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Topol EJ (2019) High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 25:44–56CrossRef Topol EJ (2019) High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 25:44–56CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gong B, Nugent JP, Guest W et al (2019) Influence of artificial intelligence on Canadian medical students’ preference for radiology specialty: a national survey study. Acad Radiol 26:566–577CrossRef Gong B, Nugent JP, Guest W et al (2019) Influence of artificial intelligence on Canadian medical students’ preference for radiology specialty: a national survey study. Acad Radiol 26:566–577CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pinto dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S et al (2019) Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey. Eur Radiol 29:1640–1646CrossRef Pinto dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S et al (2019) Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey. Eur Radiol 29:1640–1646CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Langlotz CP (2019) Will artificial intelligence replace radiologist? Radiology: Artificial Intelligence 1:e190058 Langlotz CP (2019) Will artificial intelligence replace radiologist? Radiology: Artificial Intelligence 1:e190058
15.
go back to reference Hinton G (2018) Deep learning – a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA 320:1101–1102CrossRef Hinton G (2018) Deep learning – a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA 320:1101–1102CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Attitudes and perceptions of UK medical students towards artificial intelligence and radiology: a multicentre survey
Authors
Cherry Sit
Rohit Srinivasan
Ashik Amlani
Keerthini Muthuswamy
Aishah Azam
Leo Monzon
Daniel Stephen Poon
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0830-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Insights into Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue