Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Review

BI-RADS update for breast cancer caregivers

Authors: Emily L. Sedgwick, Lilian Ebuoma, Anthony Hamame, Kanchan Phalak, Lorell Ruiz-Flores, Tamara Ortiz-Perez, Karla A. Sepulveda

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

This review will discuss changes relevant to breast cancer caregivers in the fifth edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Orsi CJSE, Mendelson EB, Morris EA et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston D’Orsi CJSE, Mendelson EB, Morris EA et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston
2.
go back to reference Venkatesan A, Chu P, Kerlikowske K, Sickles EA, Smith-Bindman R (2009) Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables. Radiology 250:648–657CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Venkatesan A, Chu P, Kerlikowske K, Sickles EA, Smith-Bindman R (2009) Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables. Radiology 250:648–657CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ et al (2007) Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 242:388–395CrossRefPubMed Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ et al (2007) Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 242:388–395CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bent CK, Bassett LW, D’Orsi CJ, Sayre JW (2010) The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol 194:1378–1383CrossRef Bent CK, Bassett LW, D’Orsi CJ, Sayre JW (2010) The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol 194:1378–1383CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, Bhargavan M (2001) Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 221:495–503CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, Bhargavan M (2001) Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 221:495–503CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD (1998) The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol 171:35–40CrossRef Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD (1998) The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol 171:35–40CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leung JW, Sickles EA (2007) Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 188:667–675CrossRef Leung JW, Sickles EA (2007) Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 188:667–675CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mitka M (2007) New ultrasound “elasticity” technique may reduce need for breast biopsies. JAMA 297:455CrossRefPubMed Mitka M (2007) New ultrasound “elasticity” technique may reduce need for breast biopsies. JAMA 297:455CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435–449CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435–449CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE (2012) Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 265:59–69CrossRefPubMed Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE (2012) Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 265:59–69CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, Lorusso AP, Cohen MA, Bovbjerg VE (2009) Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. Am J Roentgenol 193:1723–1730CrossRef Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, Lorusso AP, Cohen MA, Bovbjerg VE (2009) Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. Am J Roentgenol 193:1723–1730CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA (2007) Probably benign breast masses at US: Is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 244:87–93CrossRefPubMed Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA (2007) Probably benign breast masses at US: Is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 244:87–93CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA (2011) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60CrossRefPubMed King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA (2011) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
BI-RADS update for breast cancer caregivers
Authors
Emily L. Sedgwick
Lilian Ebuoma
Anthony Hamame
Kanchan Phalak
Lorell Ruiz-Flores
Tamara Ortiz-Perez
Karla A. Sepulveda
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3332-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine