Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 02-05-2024 | Atopic Dermatitis | Original Research

Upadacitinib Rapidly Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Atopic Dermatitis: 16-Week Results from Phase 3 Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and 2)

Authors: Eric L. Simpson, Vimal H. Prajapati, Yael A. Leshem, Raj Chovatiya, Marjolein S. de Bruin-Weller, Sonja Ständer, Andrew E. Pink, Brian M. Calimlim, Wan-Ju Lee, Henrique Teixeira, Barry Ladizinski, Xiaofei Hu, Yang Yang, Yingyi Liu, Meng Liu, Ayman Grada, Andrew M. Platt, Jonathan I. Silverberg

Published in: Dermatology and Therapy

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by intense itch and other symptoms that negatively impact quality of life (QoL). This study evaluates the effect of upadacitinib (an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor) monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD over 16 weeks.

Methods

This integrated analysis of the double-blind, placebo-controlled periods of phase 3 monotherapy clinical trials Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293) and Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422) assessed itch (Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [WP-NRS] and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]), skin pain and symptom severity (AD Symptom Scale), symptom frequency (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure), sleep (AD Impact Scale [ADerm-IS] and SCORAD), daily activities and emotional state (ADerm-IS), QoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] and Children’s DLQI), mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and patient impressions (Patient Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Patient Global Impression of Treatment).

Results

Data from 1683 patients (upadacitinib 15 mg, n = 557; upadacitinib 30 mg, n = 567; placebo, n = 559) were analyzed. A greater proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo experienced improvements in itch (≥ 4-point improvement on WP-NRS) by week 1 (upadacitinib 15 mg, 11.2%; upadacitinib 30 mg, 17.7%; placebo, 0.5%; P < 0.001), with response rates sustained through week 16 (upadacitinib 15 mg, 47.1%; upadacitinib 30 mg, 59.8%; placebo, 10.4%; P < 0.001). Improvements were similar for PROs assessing skin pain/symptoms, sleep, daily activities, QoL, emotional state, mental health, and patient impressions of disease severity and treatment. Responses generally improved rapidly (within 1–2 weeks), increased through weeks 4–6, and were maintained through week 16.

Conclusions

Once-daily oral upadacitinib monotherapy improved response rates across PROs compared with placebo. Upadacitinib therapy resulted in rapid, sustained improvements in PROs measuring symptom burden and QoL in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03569293 and NCT03607422.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Silverberg JI, Barbarot S, Gadkari A, et al. Atopic dermatitis in the pediatric population: a cross-sectional, international epidemiologic study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;126(4):417–28.e2.CrossRefPubMed Silverberg JI, Barbarot S, Gadkari A, et al. Atopic dermatitis in the pediatric population: a cross-sectional, international epidemiologic study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;126(4):417–28.e2.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Laughter MR, Maymone MBC, Mashayekhi S, et al. The global burden of atopic dermatitis: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2017. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(2):304–9.CrossRefPubMed Laughter MR, Maymone MBC, Mashayekhi S, et al. The global burden of atopic dermatitis: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2017. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(2):304–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ronnstad ATM, Halling-Overgaard AS, Hamann CR, Skov L, Egeberg A, Thyssen JP. Association of atopic dermatitis with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(3):448–56.e30.CrossRefPubMed Ronnstad ATM, Halling-Overgaard AS, Hamann CR, Skov L, Egeberg A, Thyssen JP. Association of atopic dermatitis with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(3):448–56.e30.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Drucker AM. Atopic dermatitis: burden of illness, quality of life, and associated complications. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2017;38(1):3–8.CrossRefPubMed Drucker AM. Atopic dermatitis: burden of illness, quality of life, and associated complications. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2017;38(1):3–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Copley-Merriman C, Zelt S, Clark M, Gnanasakthy A. Impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in dermatology drug development. Patient. 2017;10(2):203–13.CrossRefPubMed Copley-Merriman C, Zelt S, Clark M, Gnanasakthy A. Impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in dermatology drug development. Patient. 2017;10(2):203–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Augustin M, Langenbruch A, Blome C, et al. Characterizing treatment-related patient needs in atopic eczema: insights for personalized goal orientation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(1):142–52.CrossRefPubMed Augustin M, Langenbruch A, Blome C, et al. Characterizing treatment-related patient needs in atopic eczema: insights for personalized goal orientation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(1):142–52.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Williams HC, Schmitt J, Thomas KS, et al. The HOME core outcome set for clinical trials of atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149(6):1899–911.CrossRefPubMed Williams HC, Schmitt J, Thomas KS, et al. The HOME core outcome set for clinical trials of atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149(6):1899–911.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yeung J, Gooderham MJ, Hong HC, et al. Treat-to-target in the management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults: a Canadian perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89(2):372–5. Yeung J, Gooderham MJ, Hong HC, et al. Treat-to-target in the management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults: a Canadian perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89(2):372–5.
9.
go back to reference de Bruin-Weller M, Biedermann T, Bissonnette R, et al. Treat-to-target in atopic dermatitis: an international consensus on a set of core decision points for systemic therapies. Acta Derm Venereol. 2021;101(2):adv00402.CrossRefPubMed de Bruin-Weller M, Biedermann T, Bissonnette R, et al. Treat-to-target in atopic dermatitis: an international consensus on a set of core decision points for systemic therapies. Acta Derm Venereol. 2021;101(2):adv00402.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference de Bruin-Weller M, Deleuran M, Biedermann T, et al. The treat-to-target project in atopic dermatitis: one year on. Acta Derm Venereol. 2023;103:adv5382.CrossRefPubMed de Bruin-Weller M, Deleuran M, Biedermann T, et al. The treat-to-target project in atopic dermatitis: one year on. Acta Derm Venereol. 2023;103:adv5382.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Silverberg JI, Gooderham M, Katoh N, et al. Optimizing the management of atopic dermatitis with a new minimal disease activity concept and criteria and consensus-based recommendations for systemic therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2023;188:ii16–7.CrossRef Silverberg JI, Gooderham M, Katoh N, et al. Optimizing the management of atopic dermatitis with a new minimal disease activity concept and criteria and consensus-based recommendations for systemic therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2023;188:ii16–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Parmentier JM, Voss J, Graff C, et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494). BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parmentier JM, Voss J, Graff C, et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494). BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2151–68.CrossRefPubMed Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2151–68.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: analysis of follow-up data from the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(4):404–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: analysis of follow-up data from the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(4):404–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Silverberg JI, de Bruin-Weller M, Bieber T, et al. Upadacitinib plus topical corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis: week 52 AD Up study results. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149(3):977–87.e14.CrossRefPubMed Silverberg JI, de Bruin-Weller M, Bieber T, et al. Upadacitinib plus topical corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis: week 52 AD Up study results. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149(3):977–87.e14.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Reich K, Teixeira HD, de Bruin-Weller M, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2169–81.CrossRefPubMed Reich K, Teixeira HD, de Bruin-Weller M, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2169–81.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Guttman-Yassky E, Thaçi D, Pangan AL, et al. Upadacitinib in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: 16-week results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(3):877–84.CrossRefPubMed Guttman-Yassky E, Thaçi D, Pangan AL, et al. Upadacitinib in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: 16-week results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(3):877–84.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Foley C, Tundia N, Simpson E, Teixeira HD, Litcher-Kelly L, Bodhani A. Development and content validity of new patient-reported outcome questionnaires to assess the signs and symptoms and impact of atopic dermatitis: the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) and the Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS). Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(7):1139–48.CrossRefPubMed Foley C, Tundia N, Simpson E, Teixeira HD, Litcher-Kelly L, Bodhani A. Development and content validity of new patient-reported outcome questionnaires to assess the signs and symptoms and impact of atopic dermatitis: the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) and the Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS). Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(7):1139–48.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference von Kobyletzki LB, Thomas KS, Schmitt J, et al. What factors are important to patients when assessing treatment response: an international cross-sectional survey. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(1):86–90.CrossRef von Kobyletzki LB, Thomas KS, Schmitt J, et al. What factors are important to patients when assessing treatment response: an international cross-sectional survey. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(1):86–90.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Leshem YA, Chalmers JR, Apfelbacher C, et al. Measuring atopic eczema symptoms in clinical practice: the first consensus statement from the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema in clinical practice initiative. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):1181–6.CrossRefPubMed Leshem YA, Chalmers JR, Apfelbacher C, et al. Measuring atopic eczema symptoms in clinical practice: the first consensus statement from the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema in clinical practice initiative. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):1181–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bawany F, Northcott CA, Beck LA, Pigeon WR. Sleep disturbances and atopic dermatitis: relationships, methods for assessment, and therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(4):1488–500.CrossRefPubMed Bawany F, Northcott CA, Beck LA, Pigeon WR. Sleep disturbances and atopic dermatitis: relationships, methods for assessment, and therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(4):1488–500.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Silverberg JI, Chiesa-Fuxench Z, Margolis D, et al. Epidemiology and burden of sleep disturbances in atopic dermatitis in US adults. Dermatitis. 2022;33(6s):S104–13.CrossRefPubMed Silverberg JI, Chiesa-Fuxench Z, Margolis D, et al. Epidemiology and burden of sleep disturbances in atopic dermatitis in US adults. Dermatitis. 2022;33(6s):S104–13.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Upadacitinib Rapidly Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Atopic Dermatitis: 16-Week Results from Phase 3 Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and 2)
Authors
Eric L. Simpson
Vimal H. Prajapati
Yael A. Leshem
Raj Chovatiya
Marjolein S. de Bruin-Weller
Sonja Ständer
Andrew E. Pink
Brian M. Calimlim
Wan-Ju Lee
Henrique Teixeira
Barry Ladizinski
Xiaofei Hu
Yang Yang
Yingyi Liu
Meng Liu
Ayman Grada
Andrew M. Platt
Jonathan I. Silverberg
Publication date
02-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-024-01157-5
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.