Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program

Authors: Roberta Pineda, Jessica Roussin, Jenny Kwon, Elizabeth Heiny, Graham Colditz, Joan Smith

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To maximize the benefit of parent-directed, positive sensory exposures in the NICU, a structured sensory-based program titled the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program was developed that includes specific doses and targeted timing of evidence-based sensory exposures.

Methods

The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to systematically evaluate the SENSE program as an implementation strategy. One-hundred preterm infants ≤32 weeks gestation were studied (61 receiving the SENSE program and 39 standard-of-care). Parent education time and infant sensory exposures were tracked, and parents completed a questionnaire that probed their perceptions about the SENSE program.

Results

One-hundered thirty-one families were recruited, and 100 (76%) enrolled. The SENSE program was initiated at an average postmenstrual age of 29.8 (±2.4) weeks; 4.9 (±5.6) days after birth. The average number of education sessions with families was 4.8 (±3.7) amounting to 72.3 (±37.4) total minutes over hospitalization. The total time of logged tactile and auditory exposures among SENSE recipients over the length of hospitalization was a median (IQ range) of 9325 (5295-15,694) minutes over an average of 10.1 (±7.6) weeks of hospitalization. There were differences in the proportion of tactile and auditory exposure targets received by the infant among those receiving the SENSE program compared to standard-of-care (91% compared to 48%; p < 0.0001). Ninety-five percent of infants tolerated the SENSE program as defined, with 5% of infants requiring intermittent adaptations or the interventions being stopped for a period that typically lasted 1–2 weeks. Earlier parent education was related to more parent participation in SENSE program interventions (p = 0.04). Eighty-five percent of participants receiving the SENSE program had most of the sensory interventions completed by parents, as opposed to the medical or sensory support team. Seventy-two percent of infants had at least 100% of the auditory and tactile doses conducted over the length of stay. Parents reported acceptability.

Conclusion

The SENSE program had good reach, was effective and acceptable with minimal cost, was adopted, and had good fidelity. Insights from implementation of the SENSE program (within a research study) informed future strategies to aid maintenance during dissemination.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pineda R, Guth R, Herring A, Reynolds L, Oberle S, Smith J. Enhancing sensory experiences for very preterm infants in the NICU: an integrative review. J Perinatol. 2017;37(4):323–32.CrossRef Pineda R, Guth R, Herring A, Reynolds L, Oberle S, Smith J. Enhancing sensory experiences for very preterm infants in the NICU: an integrative review. J Perinatol. 2017;37(4):323–32.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Feldman R, Rosenthal Z, Eidelman AI. Maternal-preterm skin-to-skin contact enhances child physiologic organization and cognitive control across the first 10 years of life. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75(1):56–64.CrossRef Feldman R, Rosenthal Z, Eidelman AI. Maternal-preterm skin-to-skin contact enhances child physiologic organization and cognitive control across the first 10 years of life. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75(1):56–64.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Procianoy RS, Mendes EW, Silveira RC. Massage therapy improves neurodevelopment outcome at two years corrected age for very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(1):7–11.CrossRef Procianoy RS, Mendes EW, Silveira RC. Massage therapy improves neurodevelopment outcome at two years corrected age for very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(1):7–11.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Juneau AL, Aita M, Heon M. Review and critical analysis of massage studies for term and preterm infants. Neonatal Netw. 2015;34(3):165–77.CrossRef Juneau AL, Aita M, Heon M. Review and critical analysis of massage studies for term and preterm infants. Neonatal Netw. 2015;34(3):165–77.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lawhon G, Hedlund RE. Newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program training and education. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22(2):133–44 quiz 45-6.CrossRef Lawhon G, Hedlund RE. Newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program training and education. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22(2):133–44 quiz 45-6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Welch MG, Hofer MA, Brunelli SA, Stark RI, Andrews HF, Austin J, et al. Family nurture intervention (FNI): methods and treatment protocol of a randomized controlled trial in the NICU. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:14.CrossRef Welch MG, Hofer MA, Brunelli SA, Stark RI, Andrews HF, Austin J, et al. Family nurture intervention (FNI): methods and treatment protocol of a randomized controlled trial in the NICU. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:14.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fox MK, Pac S, Devaney B, Jankowski L. Feeding infants and toddlers study: What foods are infants and toddlers eating? J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104(1 Suppl 1):s22–30.CrossRef Fox MK, Pac S, Devaney B, Jankowski L. Feeding infants and toddlers study: What foods are infants and toddlers eating? J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104(1 Suppl 1):s22–30.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference White-Traut R, Norr KF, Fabiyi C, Rankin KM, Li Z, Liu L. Mother-infant interaction improves with a developmental intervention for mother-preterm infant dyads. Infant Behav Dev. 2013;36(4):694–706.CrossRef White-Traut R, Norr KF, Fabiyi C, Rankin KM, Li Z, Liu L. Mother-infant interaction improves with a developmental intervention for mother-preterm infant dyads. Infant Behav Dev. 2013;36(4):694–706.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pineda R, Roussin J, Heiny E, Smith J. Health care professionals’ perceptions about sensory-based interventions in the NICU. Am J Perinatol. 2018. Pineda R, Roussin J, Heiny E, Smith J. Health care professionals’ perceptions about sensory-based interventions in the NICU. Am J Perinatol. 2018.
13.
go back to reference Pineda R, Raney M, Smith J. Supporting and enhancing NICU sensory experiences (SENSE): defining developmentally-appropriate sensory exposures for high-risk infants. Early Hum Dev. 2019;133:29–35.CrossRef Pineda R, Raney M, Smith J. Supporting and enhancing NICU sensory experiences (SENSE): defining developmentally-appropriate sensory exposures for high-risk infants. Early Hum Dev. 2019;133:29–35.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.CrossRef Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.CrossRef Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pye V, Taylor N, Clay-Williams R, Braithwaite J. When is enough, enough? Understanding and solving your sample size problems in health services research. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:90.CrossRef Pye V, Taylor N, Clay-Williams R, Braithwaite J. When is enough, enough? Understanding and solving your sample size problems in health services research. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:90.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reynolds LC, Duncan MM, Smith GC, Mathur A, Neil J, Inder T, et al. Parental presence and holding in the neonatal intensive care unit and associations with early neurobehavior. J Perinatol. 2013;33(8):636–41.CrossRef Reynolds LC, Duncan MM, Smith GC, Mathur A, Neil J, Inder T, et al. Parental presence and holding in the neonatal intensive care unit and associations with early neurobehavior. J Perinatol. 2013;33(8):636–41.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pineda R, Bender J, Hall B, Shabosky L, Annecca A, Smith J. Parent participation in the neonatal intensive care unit: predictors and relationships to neurobehavior and developmental outcomes. Early Hum Dev. 2018;117:32–8.CrossRef Pineda R, Bender J, Hall B, Shabosky L, Annecca A, Smith J. Parent participation in the neonatal intensive care unit: predictors and relationships to neurobehavior and developmental outcomes. Early Hum Dev. 2018;117:32–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Liszka L, Smith J, Mathur A, Schlaggar BL, Colditz G, Pineda R. Differences in early auditory exposure across neonatal environments. Early Hum Dev. 2019;136:27–32.CrossRef Liszka L, Smith J, Mathur A, Schlaggar BL, Colditz G, Pineda R. Differences in early auditory exposure across neonatal environments. Early Hum Dev. 2019;136:27–32.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Verklan MT, Walden M. Developmental support. Curriculum for neonatal intensive care nursing. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saudners; 2010. Verklan MT, Walden M. Developmental support. Curriculum for neonatal intensive care nursing. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saudners; 2010.
24.
go back to reference Clubbs BH, Barnette AR, Gray N, Weiner L, Bond A, Harden J, et al. A community hospital NICU developmental care partner program: feasibility and association with decreased nurse burnout without increased infant infection rates. Adv Neonatal Care. 2019;19(4):311–20.CrossRef Clubbs BH, Barnette AR, Gray N, Weiner L, Bond A, Harden J, et al. A community hospital NICU developmental care partner program: feasibility and association with decreased nurse burnout without increased infant infection rates. Adv Neonatal Care. 2019;19(4):311–20.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Minear S, Wachman EM. Management of newborns with prenatal opioid exposure: one institution’s journey. Clin Ther. 2019;41(9):1663–8.CrossRef Minear S, Wachman EM. Management of newborns with prenatal opioid exposure: one institution’s journey. Clin Ther. 2019;41(9):1663–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pineda R, Wallendorf M, Smith J. A pilot study demonstrating the impact of the supporting and enhancing NICU sensory experiences (SENSE) program on the mother and infant. Early Hum Dev. 2020;144:105000.CrossRef Pineda R, Wallendorf M, Smith J. A pilot study demonstrating the impact of the supporting and enhancing NICU sensory experiences (SENSE) program on the mother and infant. Early Hum Dev. 2020;144:105000.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Riley LSA, Kilpatrick S. Guidelines for perinatal care. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012. Riley LSA, Kilpatrick S. Guidelines for perinatal care. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012.
28.
go back to reference Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016;11:33.CrossRef Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016;11:33.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Harvey GKA, editor. Implementing evidence-based practice in healthcare: a facilitation guide. London: Routledge; 2015. Harvey GKA, editor. Implementing evidence-based practice in healthcare: a facilitation guide. London: Routledge; 2015.
Metadata
Title
Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program
Authors
Roberta Pineda
Jessica Roussin
Jenny Kwon
Elizabeth Heiny
Graham Colditz
Joan Smith
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02594-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pediatrics 1/2021 Go to the issue