Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2022

24-02-2022 | Original Article

Applying Machine Learning to Determine Popular Patient Questions About Mentoplasty on Social Media

Authors: Rushi Patel, Christopher C. Tseng, Hannaan S. Choudhry, Mehdi S. Lemdani, Guy Talmor, Boris Paskhover

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patient satisfaction in esthetic surgery often necessitates synergy between patient and physician goals. The authors aim to characterize patient questions before and after mentoplasty to reflect the patient perspective and enhance the physician–patient relationship.

Methods

Mentoplasty reviews were gathered from Realself.com using an automated web crawler. Questions were defined as preoperative or postoperative. Each question was reviewed and characterized by the authors into general categories to best reflect the overall theme of the question. A machine learning approach was utilized to create a list of the most common patient questions, asked both preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results

A total of 2,012 questions were collected. Of these, 1,708 (84.9%) and 304 (15.1%) preoperative and postoperative questions, respectively. The primary category for patients preoperatively was “eligibility for surgery” (86.3%), followed by “surgical techniques and logistics” (5.4%) and “cost” (5.4%). Of the postoperative questions, the most common questions were about “options to revise surgery” (44.1%), “symptoms after surgery” (27.0%), and “appearance” (26.3%). Our machine learning approach generated the 10 most common pre- and postoperative questions about mentoplasty. The majority of preoperative questions dealt with potential surgical indications, while most postoperative questions principally addressed appearance.

Conclusions

The majority of mentoplasty patient questions were preoperative and asked about eligibility of surgery. Our study also found a significant proportion of postoperative questions inquired about revision, suggesting a small but nontrivial subset of patients highly dissatisfied with their results. Our 10 most common preoperative and postoperative question handout can help better inform physicians about the patient perspective on mentoplasty throughout their surgical course.
Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Oscimar Sofia B et al (2018) Mentoplasty for the treatment of chin deformities. Inter J Otorhinolaryngology 5(1):4 Oscimar Sofia B et al (2018) Mentoplasty for the treatment of chin deformities. Inter J Otorhinolaryngology 5(1):4
3.
go back to reference Harris WC, Raggio BS (2020) Facial Chin Augmentation Harris WC, Raggio BS (2020) Facial Chin Augmentation
4.
go back to reference Schwitzer JA et al. () Assessing patient-reported outcomes following orthognathic surgery and osseous genioplasty. J Craniofacial Surg 26(8) Schwitzer JA et al. () Assessing patient-reported outcomes following orthognathic surgery and osseous genioplasty. J Craniofacial Surg 26(8)
5.
go back to reference White JB, Dufresne CR (2011) Management and avoidance of complications in chin augmentation. Aesthetic Surg J 31(6):634–642CrossRef White JB, Dufresne CR (2011) Management and avoidance of complications in chin augmentation. Aesthetic Surg J 31(6):634–642CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ching S et al (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(1):469–482PubMedCrossRef Ching S et al (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(1):469–482PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sykes JM (2009) Managing the psychological aspects of plastic surgery patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17(4):321–325PubMedCrossRef Sykes JM (2009) Managing the psychological aspects of plastic surgery patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17(4):321–325PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Motosko CC et al (2018) Googling aesthetic plastic surgery for patient insights into the latest Trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(6):1478–1485PubMedCrossRef Motosko CC et al (2018) Googling aesthetic plastic surgery for patient insights into the latest Trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(6):1478–1485PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fan KL et al (2019) The public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(2):619–630PubMedCrossRef Fan KL et al (2019) The public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(2):619–630PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Furnas HJ (2019) Discussion: the public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(2):631–632PubMedCrossRef Furnas HJ (2019) Discussion: the public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(2):631–632PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sanati-Mehrizy P et al (2020) The “RealSelf Effect”: Can patient reviews on social media impact clinic volume? Ann Plast Surg 85(4):352–357PubMedCrossRef Sanati-Mehrizy P et al (2020) The “RealSelf Effect”: Can patient reviews on social media impact clinic volume? Ann Plast Surg 85(4):352–357PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD (2016) Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis. Aesth Surg J 36(1):NP1-NP5 Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD (2016) Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis. Aesth Surg J 36(1):NP1-NP5
13.
go back to reference Tseng CC et al. (2021) Characterizing patient questions before and after rhinoplasty on social media: a big data approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg, pp 1-8 Tseng CC et al. (2021) Characterizing patient questions before and after rhinoplasty on social media: a big data approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg, pp 1-8
14.
go back to reference Domanski MC, Cavale N (2012) Self-reported “worth it” rating of aesthetic surgery in social media. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(6):1292–1295PubMedCrossRef Domanski MC, Cavale N (2012) Self-reported “worth it” rating of aesthetic surgery in social media. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(6):1292–1295PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tseng CC et al. (2021) Machine learning approach to analyzing patient questions about facial feminization. Aesthetic Surg J Tseng CC et al. (2021) Machine learning approach to analyzing patient questions about facial feminization. Aesthetic Surg J
16.
go back to reference Hockney SM et al (2018) Identifying drivers of plastic surgeons’ online ratings in abdominoplasty. Plastic Reconst Surg Global Open 6(9S):228CrossRef Hockney SM et al (2018) Identifying drivers of plastic surgeons’ online ratings in abdominoplasty. Plastic Reconst Surg Global Open 6(9S):228CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Husain S et al (2021) Nonsurgical rhinoplasty: a realself social media analysis. Am J Cosmetic Surg 38(2):86–89CrossRef Husain S et al (2021) Nonsurgical rhinoplasty: a realself social media analysis. Am J Cosmetic Surg 38(2):86–89CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Weinstein AG (2012) Connect with plastic surgery: social media for good. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(3):789–792PubMedCrossRef Rohrich RJ, Weinstein AG (2012) Connect with plastic surgery: social media for good. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(3):789–792PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vardanian AJ et al (2013) Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):1184–1193PubMedCrossRef Vardanian AJ et al (2013) Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):1184–1193PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Clapham PJ, Pushman AG, Chung KC (2010) A systematic review of applying patient satisfaction outcomes in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1826–1833PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Clapham PJ, Pushman AG, Chung KC (2010) A systematic review of applying patient satisfaction outcomes in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1826–1833PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fottler MD, Ford RC, Bach SA (1997) Measuring patient satisfaction in healthcare organizations: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc 2(6):227–239PubMed Fottler MD, Ford RC, Bach SA (1997) Measuring patient satisfaction in healthcare organizations: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc 2(6):227–239PubMed
22.
go back to reference Chung KC et al (1999) Predictors of patient satisfaction in an outpatient plastic surgery clinic. Ann Plast Surg 42(1):56–60PubMedCrossRef Chung KC et al (1999) Predictors of patient satisfaction in an outpatient plastic surgery clinic. Ann Plast Surg 42(1):56–60PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Black E et al (2009) An analysis of healthcare providers’ online ratings. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics 17(4):249–253CrossRef Black E et al (2009) An analysis of healthcare providers’ online ratings. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics 17(4):249–253CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lau GT, Ng S (2009) Individual and Situational Factors Influencing Negative Word-of-Mouth Behaviour. Can J Admin Sci Revue 18(3):163–178CrossRef Lau GT, Ng S (2009) Individual and Situational Factors Influencing Negative Word-of-Mouth Behaviour. Can J Admin Sci Revue 18(3):163–178CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lim S, Tucker CS, Kumara S (2017) An unsupervised machine learning model for discovering latent infectious diseases using social media data. J Biomed Inform 66:82–94PubMedCrossRef Lim S, Tucker CS, Kumara S (2017) An unsupervised machine learning model for discovering latent infectious diseases using social media data. J Biomed Inform 66:82–94PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Andy AU et al. (2021) Predicting cardiovascular risk using social media data: performance evaluation of machine-learning models. JMIR Cardio 5(1):e24473 Andy AU et al. (2021) Predicting cardiovascular risk using social media data: performance evaluation of machine-learning models. JMIR Cardio 5(1):e24473
27.
go back to reference Mantelakis A et al. (2021) Machine learning demonstrates high accuracy for disease diagnosis and prognosis in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 9(6):e3638 Mantelakis A et al. (2021) Machine learning demonstrates high accuracy for disease diagnosis and prognosis in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 9(6):e3638
28.
go back to reference McCullough M et al (2021) Convolutional neural network models for automatic preoperative severity assessment in unilateral cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 148(1):162–169PubMedCrossRef McCullough M et al (2021) Convolutional neural network models for automatic preoperative severity assessment in unilateral cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 148(1):162–169PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Najjaran Toussi H, Shareh H (2019) Changes in the indices of body image concern, sexual self-esteem and sexual body image in females undergoing cosmetic rhinoplasty: a single-group trial. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 43(3):771-779 Najjaran Toussi H, Shareh H (2019) Changes in the indices of body image concern, sexual self-esteem and sexual body image in females undergoing cosmetic rhinoplasty: a single-group trial. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 43(3):771-779
30.
go back to reference Othman S et al. (2020) The influence of photo editing applications on patients seeking facial plastic surgery services. Aesthetic Surg J 41(3):NP101-NP110 Othman S et al. (2020) The influence of photo editing applications on patients seeking facial plastic surgery services. Aesthetic Surg J 41(3):NP101-NP110
31.
go back to reference Montemurro P et al (2015) The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(2):270–277PubMedCrossRef Montemurro P et al (2015) The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(2):270–277PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dorfman RG et al (2017) Plastic surgery-related hashtag utilization on instagram: implications for education and marketing. Aesthetic Surg J 38(3):332–338CrossRef Dorfman RG et al (2017) Plastic surgery-related hashtag utilization on instagram: implications for education and marketing. Aesthetic Surg J 38(3):332–338CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Shah A et al (2017) Public perception of cosmetic surgeons versus plastic surgeons: Increasing transparency to educate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(2):544e–557ePubMedCrossRef Shah A et al (2017) Public perception of cosmetic surgeons versus plastic surgeons: Increasing transparency to educate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(2):544e–557ePubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Chang EW et al (2001) Sliding genioplasty for correction of chin abnormalities. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3(1):8–15PubMedCrossRef Chang EW et al (2001) Sliding genioplasty for correction of chin abnormalities. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3(1):8–15PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Guyuron B, Raszewski RL (1990) A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14(3):199–206PubMedCrossRef Guyuron B, Raszewski RL (1990) A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14(3):199–206PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Aynehchi BB et al (2012) Vertical incision intraoral silicone chin augmentation. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 146(4):553–559PubMedCrossRef Aynehchi BB et al (2012) Vertical incision intraoral silicone chin augmentation. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 146(4):553–559PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Keyhan SO et al (2013) Zigzag genioplasty; patients evaluation, technique modifications and review of the literature. The Am J Cosmetic Surg 30(2):80–88CrossRef Keyhan SO et al (2013) Zigzag genioplasty; patients evaluation, technique modifications and review of the literature. The Am J Cosmetic Surg 30(2):80–88CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Alokozai A et al (2019) Cost in hand surgery: the patient perspective. J Hand Surg 44(11):992.e1-992.e26CrossRef Alokozai A et al (2019) Cost in hand surgery: the patient perspective. J Hand Surg 44(11):992.e1-992.e26CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Placona AM, Rathert C (2021) Are online patient reviews associated with health care outcomes? A systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev, p 10775587211014534 Placona AM, Rathert C (2021) Are online patient reviews associated with health care outcomes? A systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev, p 10775587211014534
40.
go back to reference Parmeshwar N et al (2018) Evaluation of information sources in plastic surgery decision-making. Cureus, 10(6) Parmeshwar N et al (2018) Evaluation of information sources in plastic surgery decision-making. Cureus, 10(6)
41.
go back to reference Chawla S et al. (2021) Entering the misinformation age: quality and reliability of youtube for patient information on liposuction. Plastic Surg, p 22925503211064382 Chawla S et al. (2021) Entering the misinformation age: quality and reliability of youtube for patient information on liposuction. Plastic Surg, p 22925503211064382
42.
go back to reference Alwani MM et al (2020) Evaluation of the quality of printed online education materials in cosmetic facial plastic surgery. Facial Plastic Surg Aesthetic medicine 22(4):255–261CrossRef Alwani MM et al (2020) Evaluation of the quality of printed online education materials in cosmetic facial plastic surgery. Facial Plastic Surg Aesthetic medicine 22(4):255–261CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lo Torto F et al (2020) Quality assessment of online information on body contouring surgery in postbariatric patient. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(3):839–846PubMedCrossRef Lo Torto F et al (2020) Quality assessment of online information on body contouring surgery in postbariatric patient. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(3):839–846PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Addar A et al (2017) Assessment of “YouTube” content for distal radius fracture immobilization. J Surg Educ 74(5):799–804PubMedCrossRef Addar A et al (2017) Assessment of “YouTube” content for distal radius fracture immobilization. J Surg Educ 74(5):799–804PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Iglesias-Puzas Á, Conde-Taboada A, López-Bran E (2021) A cross-sectional study of YouTube videos on Mohs surgery: Quality of content and sentiment analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol Iglesias-Puzas Á, Conde-Taboada A, López-Bran E (2021) A cross-sectional study of YouTube videos on Mohs surgery: Quality of content and sentiment analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol
46.
go back to reference Harden C, Stephen W (2013) Six things every plastic surgeon needs to know about teamwork training and checklists. Aesthetic Surg J, p 443-448 Harden C, Stephen W (2013) Six things every plastic surgeon needs to know about teamwork training and checklists. Aesthetic Surg J, p 443-448
47.
go back to reference Hepner DL et al (2004) Patient satisfaction with preoperative assessment in a preoperative assessment testing clinic. Anesth Analg 98(4):1099–1105PubMedCrossRef Hepner DL et al (2004) Patient satisfaction with preoperative assessment in a preoperative assessment testing clinic. Anesth Analg 98(4):1099–1105PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Applying Machine Learning to Determine Popular Patient Questions About Mentoplasty on Social Media
Authors
Rushi Patel
Christopher C. Tseng
Hannaan S. Choudhry
Mehdi S. Lemdani
Guy Talmor
Boris Paskhover
Publication date
24-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02808-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2022 Go to the issue