Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2022

Open Access 24-01-2022 | Silicone | Review

Effects of Silicone Breast Implants on Human Cell Types In Vitro: A Closer Look on Host and Implant

Authors: Maartje J. L. Colaris, Tim Ruhl, Justus P. Beier

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Silicone (gel) breast implants (SBI) are used world-wide for breast augmentation, and reconstruction or to correct breast deformities. They consist of two compounds: an elastomer silicone shell (envelope) and a silicone gel filler (core). Breast Implant Illness (BII) is a term used for women with SBI, who suffer from various of symptoms including myalgia, arthralgia, fatigue, fever, dry eyes and/or dry mouth (sicca), as well as cognitive disturbances, which are rated by these woman as response to SBI. The pathogenesis of these adverse effects as well as the histocompatibility and the SBI-cell interaction of silicone and its surrounding tissue (implant-host tissue interface) is a subject of current research. The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the effects of silicone (gel and elastomer surfaces) of a SBI on different human cell types from experimental - in vitro - models.

Methods

A comprehensive research was conducted by two independent reviewers in March and July of 2020 in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases.

Results

A number of 1328 articles on this topic were initially identified, of which 62 could be finally included an analysed in this review.

Conclusion

SBI may lead to a physiologic pro-inflammatory and foreign body host response with fibrous encapsulation accompanied by a disturbed Th17/Treg balance and IL-17 production. No causal relationship is known for systemic symptoms and/or autoimmune outcomes in the context of BII.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
Cronin T, Gerow F (1994) Augmentation mammoplasty: A new "natural feel" prosthesis. In: Transact III Int Congr Plast Surg, I P R S Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam:66:41-49.
2.
Center for Devices and Radiological Health and U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Update on the Safety of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants. June 2011. In. Accessed at The FDA Breast Implant website, www.​fda.​gov/​breastimplants on 28 July 2020.
3.
DA K, (1992) The basis of the FDA’s decision on breast implants. N Engl J Med 326:1713–1715CrossRef
4.
Balk EM, Earley A, Avendano EA, Raman G (2016) Long-Term Health Outcomes in Women With Silicone Gel Breast Implants: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med 164(3):164–175PubMedCrossRef
5.
Singh N, Picha GJ, Hardas B, Schumacher A, Murphy DK (2017) Five-Year Safety Data for More than 55,000 Subjects following Breast Implantation: Comparison of Rare Adverse Event Rates with Silicone Implants versus National Norms and Saline Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(4):666–679PubMedCrossRef
6.
The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) (2019) The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery’s Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank: Statistics 2018. Aesthet Surg J 39:1–27CrossRef
7.
de Boer M, van Middelkoop M, Hauptmann M et al (2020) Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs. Aesthet Surg J 40(2):156–164PubMedCrossRef
8.
Bach AD, Kneser U, Beier JP, Breuel C, Horch RE, Leffler M (2009) Aesthetic correction of tuberous breast deformity: lessons learned with a single-stage procedure. Breast J 15(3):279–286PubMedCrossRef
9.
Colaris MJL, de Boer M, van der Hulst RR, Cohen Tervaert JW (2017) Two hundreds cases of ASIA syndrome following silicone implants: a comparative study of 30 years and a review of current literature. Immunol Res 65(1):120–128PubMedCrossRef
10.
Miseré RML, Colaris MJL, van der Hulst RRWJ (2020) The Prevalence of Self-Reported Health Complaints and Health-Related Quality of Life in Women With Breast Implants. Aesthet Surg J 41(6):661–668PubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levin N (2011) “ASIA” - autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants. J Autoimmun 36(1):4–8PubMedCrossRef
12.
Coroneos CJ, Selber JC, Offodile AC, Butler CE, Clemens MW (2019) US FDA Breast Implant Postapproval Studies: Long-term Outcomes in 99,993 Patients. Ann Surg 269(1):30–36PubMedCrossRef
13.
Watad A, Rosenberg V, Tiosano S et al (2018) Silicone breast implants and the risk of autoimmune/rheumatic disorders: a real-world analysis. Int J Epidemiol 47(6):1846–1854PubMedCrossRef
14.
de Boer M, van Leeuwen FE, Hauptmann M et al (2018) Breast Implants and the Risk of Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma in the Breast. JAMA Oncol 4(3):335–341PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Mcguire PA, Haws MJ, Nahai F (2019) Breast Implant Illness: How Can We Help? Aesthet Surg J 39(11):1260–1263PubMedCrossRef
16.
Cohen Tervaert JW, Kappel RM (2013) Silicone implant incompatibility syndrome (SIIS): a frequent cause of ASIA (Shoenfeld’s syndrome). Immunol Res 56(2–3):293–298PubMedCrossRef
17.
Wolfe F (1999) “Silicone related symptoms” are common in patients with fibromyalgia: no evidence for a new disease. J Rheumatol 26(5):1172–1175PubMed
18.
Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA (1997) Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet 350(9090):1531–1537PubMedCrossRef
19.
Bar-Meir E, Teuber SS, Lin HC et al (1995) Multiple autoantibodies in patients with silicone breast implants. J Autoimmun 8(2):267–277PubMedCrossRef
20.
Colaris MJL, van der Hulst RR, Tervaert JWC (2017) Vitamin D deficiency as a risk factor for the development of autoantibodies in patients with ASIA and silicone breast implants: a cohort study and review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol 36(5):981–993PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Bondurant S, Ernster V, Herdman R (1999) Safety of Silicone Breast Implants. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
22.
McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L (2004) Brain cancer and cosmetic breast implants: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg 52(2):115–117PubMedCrossRef
23.
Lipworth L, McLaughlin JK (2010) Excess suicide risk and other external causes of death among women with cosmetic breast implants: a neglected research priority. Curr Psychiatry Rep 12(3):234–238PubMedCrossRef
24.
Maijers MC, de Blok CJ, Niessen FB et al (2013) Women with silicone breast implants and unexplained systemic symptoms: a descriptive cohort study. Neth J Med 71(10):534–540PubMed
25.
de Boer M, Colaris M, van der Hulst RRWJ, Cohen Tervaert JW (2017) Is explantation of silicone breast implants useful in patients with complaints? Immunol Res 65(1):25–36PubMedCrossRef
26.
Young VL, Nemecek JR, Schwartz BD, Phelan DL, Schorr MW (1995) HLA typing in women with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(7):1497–1519PubMedCrossRef
27.
Vera-Lastra O, Cruz-Domínguez MP, Medrado Ramírez G et al (2019) Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Silicone Breast Implant and Risk Factors Associated to Autoimmune Diseases. Rheumatology 9(1):1–6
28.
Nesher G, Soriano A, Shlomai G et al (2015) Severe ASIA syndrome associated with lymph node, thoracic, and pulmonary silicone infiltration following breast implant rupture: experience with four cases. Lupus 24(4–5):463–468PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
Tang SY, Israel JS, Afifi AM (2017) Breast Implant Illness: Symptoms, Patient Concerns, and the Power of Social Media. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5):765e–766ePubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
33.
34.
Yu LT, Latorre G, Marotta J, Batich C, Hardt NS (1996) In vitro measurement of silicone bleed from breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(4):756–764PubMedCrossRef
35.
Lykissa ED, Kala SV, Hurley JB, Lebovitz RM (1997) Release of low molecular weight silicones and platinum from silicone breast implants. Anal Chem 69(23):4912–4916PubMedCrossRef
36.
Lourenço FRKI, Pinto TJA (2011) Silicone Gel Bleed on Breast Implants. Open Biomater J 3:14–17CrossRef
37.
Kappel RM, Boer LL, Dijkman H (2016) Gel Bleed and Rupture of Silicone Breast Implants Investigated by Light-, Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis of Internal Organs and Nervous Tissue. Clin Med Rev Case Rep 3(1):1–9CrossRef
38.
Cohen Tervaert JW, Colaris MJ, van der Hulst RR (2017) Silicone breast implants and autoimmune rheumatic diseases: myth or reality. Curr Opin Rheumatol 29(4):348–354PubMedCrossRef
39.
Peters W, Smith D, Lugowski S (1999) Silicon assays in women with and without silicone gel breast implants–a review. Ann Plast Surg 43(3):324–330PubMedCrossRef
40.
Peters W, Smith D, Lugowski S, McHugh A, Baines C (1995) Do patients with silicone-gel breast implants have elevated levels of blood silicon compared with control patients? Ann Plast Surg 34(4):343–347PubMedCrossRef
41.
Teuber SS, Saunders RL, Halpern GM et al (1996) Serum silicon levels are elevated in women with silicone gel implants. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 210:59–65PubMed
42.
Vijaya Bhaskar TB, Ma N, Lendlein A, Roch T (2015) The interaction of human macrophage subsets with silicone as a biomaterial. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 61(2):119–133PubMedCrossRef
43.
Tavazzani F, Xing S, Waddell JE, Smith D, Boynton EL (2005) In vitro interaction between silicone gel and human monocyte-macrophages. J Biomed Mater Res A 72(2):161–167PubMedCrossRef
44.
Barr S, Hill EW, Bayat A (2017) Functional biocompatibility testing of silicone breast implants and a novel classification system based on surface roughness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 75:75–81PubMedCrossRef
45.
Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20(2):86–100PubMedCrossRef
46.
Rhie J, Han S, Byeon J, Ahn S, Kim H (1998) Efficient in Vitro Model for Immunotoxicologic Assessment of Mammary Silicone Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1:73–77CrossRef
47.
Naim JO, van Os CJ, Ippolito KML et al (1998) In vitro activation of human monocytes by silicones. Colloids Surf, B 11(1–2):79–86CrossRef
48.
McCauley RL, Riley WB, Juliano RA, Brown P, Evans MJ, Robson MC (1990) In vitro alterations in human fibroblast behavior secondary to silicone polymers. J Surg Res 49(1):103–109PubMedCrossRef
49.
Seyhan H, Kopp J, Beier JP et al (2011) Smooth and textured silicone surfaces of modified gel mammary prostheses cause a different impact on fibroproliferative properties of dermal fibroblasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(3):e60-66PubMedCrossRef
50.
Kyle DJ, Oikonomou A, Hill E, Bayat A (2015) Development and functional evaluation of biomimetic silicone surfaces with hierarchical micro/nano-topographical features demonstrates favourable in vitro foreign body response of breast-derived fibroblasts. Biomaterials 52:88–102PubMedCrossRef
51.
Tan KT, Wijeratne D, Shih B, Baildam AD, Bayat A (2010) Tumour necrosis factor-α expression is associated with increased severity of periprosthetic breast capsular contracture. Eur Surg Res 45(3–4):327–332PubMedCrossRef
52.
Bachour Y, Verweij SP, Gibbs S et al (2018) The aetiopathogenesis of capsular contracture: A systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(3):307–317PubMedCrossRef
53.
Joseph J, Variathu KT, Mohanty M (2013) Mediatory role of interleukin-6 in α smooth muscle actin induction and myofibroblast formation around silicone tissue expander. J Biomed Mater Res A 101(10):2967–2973PubMedCrossRef
54.
Wolfram D, Rabensteiner E, Grundtman C et al (2012) T regulatory cells and TH17 cells in peri-silicone implant capsular fibrosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):327e–337ePubMedCrossRef
55.
Wolfram D, Oberreiter B, Mayerl C et al (2008) Altered systemic serologic parameters in patients with silicone mammary implants. Immunol Lett 118(1):96–100PubMedCrossRef
56.
Prantl L, Angele P, Schreml S, Ulrich D, Pöppl N, Eisenmann-Klein M (2006) Determination of serum fibrosis indexes in patients with capsular contracture after augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(1):224–229PubMedCrossRef
57.
Prantl L, Poppl N, Horvat N, Heine N, Eisenmann-Klein M (2005) Serologic and histologic findings in patients with capsular contracture after breast augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants: is serum hyaluronan a potential predictor? Aesthetic Plast Surg 29(6):510–518PubMedCrossRef
58.
Poeppl N, Schreml S, Lichtenegger F, Lenich A, Eisenmann-Klein M, Prantl L (2007) Does the surface structure of implants have an impact on the formation of a capsular contracture? Aesthetic Plast Surg 31(2):133–139PubMedCrossRef
59.
Portillo ME, Corvec S, Borens O, Trampuz A (2013) Propionibacterium acnes: an underestimated pathogen in implant-associated infections. Biomed Res Int 2013:804391PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Aubin GG, Portillo ME, Trampuz A, Corvec S (2014) Propionibacterium acnes, an emerging pathogen: from acne to implant-infections, from phylotype to resistance. Med Mal Infect 44(6):241–250PubMedCrossRef
61.
Sank A, Chalabian-Baliozian J, Ertl D, Sherman R, Nimni M, Tuan TL (1993) Cellular responses to silicone and polyurethane prosthetic surfaces. J Surg Res 54(1):12–20PubMedCrossRef
62.
van Kooten TG, von Recum AF (1999) Cell adhesion to textured silicone surfaces: the influence of time of adhesion and texture on focal contact and fibronectin fibril formation. Tissue Eng 5(3):223–240PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of Silicone Breast Implants on Human Cell Types In Vitro: A Closer Look on Host and Implant
Authors
Maartje J. L. Colaris
Tim Ruhl
Justus P. Beier
Publication date
24-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Silicone
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02762-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2022 Go to the issue

Original Article

Efficacy of Early Application of 1540 nm Non-ablative Fractional Laser and Silicones to Improve Post-epicanthoplasty Scars

Original Article

Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Augmentation Mammoplasty with Cell-Assisted Autologous Fat Transplantation

Original Article

Body Contouring Using a Combination of Pulsed Ultrasound and Unipolar Radio Frequency: A Prospective Pilot Study

Original Article

Implants Versus Lipograft: Analysis of Long-Term Results Following Congenital Breast Asymmetry Correction

Original Article

A Modified Large-Cap Graft in East Asian Revision Rhinoplasty

Original Article

Risk Factors Analysis for Different Types of Unfavorable Fracture Patterns During Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Retrospective Study of 2008 Sides