Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Anxiety | Research

Treatment suspension due to the coronavirus pandemic and mental health of infertile patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Authors: Elnaz Iranifard, Atefeh Yas, Elahe Mansouri Ghezelhesari, Ali Taghipour, Malihe Mahmoudinia, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Access to fertility treatments is considered a reproductive right, but because of the quarantine due to the coronavirus pandemic most infertility treatments were suspended, which might affect the psychological and emotional health of infertile patients. Therefore, this study was conducted to review the mental health of infertile patients facing treatment suspension due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Methods

This study was conducted based on the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guideline. The Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases were searched by two independent researchers, without time limitation until 31 December 2022. All observational studies regarding the mental health of infertile patients facing treatment suspension including anxiety, depression, and stress were included in the study. Qualitative studies, editorials, brief communications, commentaries, conference papers, guidelines, and studies with no full text were excluded. Quality assessment was carried out using Newcastle–Ottawa Scale by two researchers, independently. The random effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of mental health problems. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to confirm the sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Out of 681 studies, 21 studies with 5901 infertile patients were systematically reviewed, from which 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results of all pooled studies showed that the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress in female patients was 48.4% (95% CI 34.8–62.3), 42% (95% CI 26.7–59.4), and 55% (95% CI 45.4–65), respectively. Additionally, 64.4% (95% CI 50.7–76.1) of patients wished to resume their treatments despite the coronavirus pandemic.

Conclusion

Treatment suspension due to the coronavirus pandemic negatively affected the mental health of infertile patients. It is important to maintain the continuity of fertility care, with special attention paid to mental health of infertile patients, through all the possible measures even during a public health crisis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Ying L, Wu LH, Loke AY. The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:689–701.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
4.
Abdollahpour S, Taghipour A, Mousavi Vahed SH, Latifnejad Roudsari R. The efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy on stress, anxiety and depression of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42:188–97.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
Katyal N, Poulsen CM, Knudsen UB, Frederiksen Y. The association between psychosocial interventions and fertility treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biology. 2021;259:125–32.CrossRef
7.
Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Janghorban R, Mousavi Bazaz SM, Amirian M, Allan HT. Infertile couples’ needs after unsuccessful fertility treatment: a qualitative study. J Caring Sci. 2019;8:95–104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Hassanzadeh Bashtian M, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Sadeghi R. Effects of acupuncture on anxiety in Infertile women: a systematic review of the literature. J Midwifery Reproductive Health. 2017;5:842–8.
9.
Phina NF. The classical definition of a pandemic is not elusive. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:540.CrossRef
10.
11.
Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Rasoulpoor S, Mohammadi M, Rasoulpoor S, Khaledi-Paveh B. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Health. 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​S12992-020-00589-W.CrossRef
12.
13.
14.
15.
Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Sharifi F, Larki M, Latifnejad Roudsari R. COVID-19 outbreak as threat of violence against women. J Midwifery Reproductive Health. 2020;8:2376–9.
17.
18.
19.
Alviggi C, Esteves SC, Orvieto R, et al. COVID-19 and assisted reproductive technology services: repercussions for patients and proposal for individualized clinical management. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020;18:45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Larki M, Sharifi F, Manouchehri E, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Responding to the essential sexual and Reproductive Health needs for women during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Literature Review. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2021;28:8–19.CrossRef
21.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Patient management and clinical recommendations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic Patient management and clinical recommendations during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic *. 1–9. 2020.
22.
The ESHRE COVID-19 Working group, Hambartsoumian E, Nouri K, et al. A picture of medically assisted reproduction activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020:1–8.
23.
24.
Boivin J, Harrison C, Mathur R, Burns G, Pericleous-Smith A, Gameiro S. Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:2556–66.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Galhardo A, Carolino N, Monteiro B, Cunha M. The emotional impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in women facing infertility. Psychol Health Med. 2021;1–7.
26.
27.
Dhada S, Stewart D, Cheema E, Hadi MA, Paudyal V. Cancer services during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review of Patient’s and Caregiver’s experiences. Cancer Manage Res. 2021;13:5875–87.CrossRef
28.
Voultsos PP, Taniskidou A-MI. Fertility treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Afr J Reprod Health. 2021;25:161–78.PubMed
29.
Kirubarajan A, Patel P, Tsang J, Prethipan T, Sreeram P, Sierra S. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility care: a qualitative systematic review. Hum Fertility. 2021;1–8.
30.
Kiani Z, Simbar M, Hajian S, Zayeri F, Shahidi M, Saei Ghare Naz M, Ghasemi V. The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility Res Pract. 2020;6:7.CrossRef
31.
Kiani Z, Simbar M, Hajian S, Zayeri F. The prevalence of depression symptoms among infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility Res Pract. 2021;7:6.CrossRef
32.
Deeks J, Higgins JP, Altman D. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ WV, editor Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2. Cochrane, 2021;pp 1–649.
33.
Barker TH, Migliavaca CB, Stein C, Colpani V, Falavigna M, Aromataris E, Munn Z. Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21:189.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Schwarzer G, Rücker G. Meta-analysis of proportions. In: Evangelou E, Veroniki AA, editors. Meta-research. Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY: Humana; 2022. p. 159–72.
35.
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of Observational studies in Epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283:2008.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Wu XY, Han LH, Zhang JH, Luo S, Hu JW, Sun K. The influence of physical activity, sedentary behavior on health-related quality of life among the general population of children and adolescents: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0187668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Xu S, Wan Y, Xu M, Ming J, Xing Y, An F, Ji Q. The association between obstructive sleep apnea and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2015;15:105.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Jawad M, Vamos EP, Najim M, Roberts B, Millett C. Impact of armed conflict on cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review. Heart. 2019;105:1388–94.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Jenkins RH, Vamos EP, Taylor-Robinson D, Millett C, Laverty AA. Impacts of the 2008 Great recession on dietary intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2021;18:1–20.CrossRef
40.
Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Navarro-Santana M, Gómez-Mayordomo V, Cuadrado ML, García-Azorín D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Plaza-Manzano G. Headache as an acute and post-COVID-19 symptom in COVID-19 survivors: a meta-analysis of the current literature. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28:3820–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Hariyanto TI, Halim DA, Jodhinata C, Yanto TA, Kurniawan A. Colchicine treatment can improve outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2021;48:823–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
43.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synthesis Methods. 2010;1:97–111.CrossRef
44.
Saha S, Chant D, Mcgrath J. Meta-analyses of the incidence and prevalence of schizophrenia: conceptual and methodological issues. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17:55–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Pacheco JPG, Bunevicius A, Oku A, et al. Pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms among medical students: an individual participant data meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23:251.CrossRef
47.
Kiani Z, Fakari FR, Hakimzadeh A, Hajian S, Fakari FR, Nasiri M. Prevalence of depression in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:1972.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Pilania M, Yadav V, Bairwa M, Behera P, Gupta SD, Khurana H, Mohan V, Baniya G, Poongothai S. Prevalence of depression among the elderly (60 years and above) population in India, 1997–2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:832.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Hawcroft C, Hughes R, Shaheen A, Usta J, Elkadi H, Dalton T, Ginwalla K, Feder G. Prevalence and health outcomes of domestic violence amongst clinical populations in arab countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:315.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Chau SWH, Wong OWH, Ramakrishnan R, et al. History for some or lesson for all? A systematic review and meta-analysis on the immediate and long-term mental health impact of the 2002–2003 severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:670.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Ayano G, Shumet S, Tesfaw G, Tsegay L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of bipolar disorder among homeless people. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:731.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Barra F, La Rosa VL, Vitale SG, Commodari E, Altieri M, Scala C, Ferrero S. Psychological status of infertile patients who had in vitro fertilization treatment interrupted or postponed due to COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2020;0:1–8.
53.
54.
Jaiswal P, Mahey R, Singh S, Vanamail P, Gupta M, Cheluvaraju R, Sharma JB, Bhatla N. Psychological impact of suspension/postponement of fertility treatments on infertile women waiting during COVID pandemic. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022;65:197–206.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Kaur H, Pranesh G, Rao K. Emotional impact of delay in fertility treatment due to COVID-19 pandemic. J Hum Reproductive Sci. 2020;13:317.CrossRef
56.
Lablanche O, Salle B, Perie M-A, Labrune E, Langlois-Jacques C, Fraison E. Psychological effect of COVID-19 pandemic among women undergoing infertility care, a French cohort – PsyCovART psychological effect of COVID-19: PsyCovART. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022;51: 102251.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Lawson AK, McQueen DB, Swanson AC, Confino R, Feinberg EC, Pavone ME. Psychological distress and postponed fertility care during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:333–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Marom Haham L, Youngster M, Kuperman Shani A, Yee S, Ben-Kimhy R, Medina-Artom TR, Hourvitz A, Kedem A, Librach C. Suspension of fertility treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: views, emotional reactions and psychological distress among women undergoing fertility treatment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42:849–58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
Mitrović M, Kostić JO, Ristić M. Intolerance of uncertainty and distress in women with delayed IVF treatment due to the COVID-19 pandemic: the mediating role of situation appraisal and coping strategies. J Health Psychol. 201;135910532110499.
60.
Rasekh Jahromi A, Daroneh E, Jamali S, Ranjbar A, Rahmanian V. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on depression and hopelessness in infertile women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2022;43:495–501.CrossRef
61.
Şahin B, Şahin B, Karlı P, Sel G, Hatırnaz Ş, Kara OF, Tinelli A. Level of depression and hopelessness among women with infertility during the outbreak of COVID-19: a cross-sectional investigation. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2021;48:594.CrossRef
62.
Seifer DB, Petok WD, Agrawal A, Glenn TL, Bayer AH, Witt BR, Burgin BD, Lieman HJ. Psychological experience and coping strategies of patients in the Northeast US delaying care for infertility during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19:66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Ben-Kimhy R, Youngster M, Medina-Artom TR, Avraham S, Gat I, Marom Haham L, Hourvitz A, Kedem A. Fertility patients under COVID-19: attitudes, perceptions and psychological reactions. Hum Reprod (Oxford England). 2020;35:2774–83.CrossRef
64.
Tokgoz VY, Kaya Y, Tekin AB. The level of anxiety in infertile women whose ART cycles are postponed due to the COVID-19 outbreak. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2020;0:1–8.
65.
Biviá-Roig G, Boldó-Roda A, Blasco-Sanz R, Serrano-Raya L, DelaFuente-Díez E, Múzquiz-Barberá P, Lisón JF. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lifestyles and Quality of Life of Women with fertility problems: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2021;9:1–10.CrossRef
66.
67.
Cao L-B, Hao Q, Liu Y, Sun Q, Wu B, Chen L, Yan L. Anxiety level during the second localized COVID-19 pandemic among quarantined infertile women: a cross-sectional survey in China. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:1–9.CrossRef
68.
Cirillo M, Rizzello F, Badolato L, De Angelis D, Evangelisti P, Coccia ME, Fatini C. The effects of COVID-19 lockdown on lifestyle and emotional state in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: results of an Italian survey. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50:102079.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Dillard AJ, Weber AE, Chassee A, Thakur M. Perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic among women with infertility: correlations with Dispositional Optimism. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19: 2577.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
71.
Esposito V, Rania E, Lico D, et al. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status of infertile couples. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biology. 2020;253:148–53.CrossRef
72.
Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyse. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2011.
73.
Deng J, Zhou F, Hou W, Silver Z, Wong CY, Chang O, Huang E, Zuo QK. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021;1486:90.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Vaughan DA, Shah JS, Penzias AS, Domar AD, Toth TL. Infertility remains a top stressor despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41:425–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
Gupta M, Jaiswal P, Bansiwal R, Sethi A, Vanamail P, Kachhawa G, Kumari R, Mahey R. Anxieties and apprehensions among women waiting for fertility treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152:441–3.CrossRef
76.
77.
Melo-Oliveira ME, Sá-Caputo D, Bachur JA, Paineiras-Domingos LL, Sonza A, Lacerda AC, Mendonça V, Seixas A, Taiar R, Bernardo-Filho M. Reported quality of life in countries with cases of COVID19: a systematic review. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021;15:213–20.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Peivandi S, Razavi A, Shafiei S, Zamaniyan M, Orafaie A, Jafarpour H. (2020) Evaluation of attitude among infertile couples about continuing assisted reproductive technologies therapy during novel coronavirus outbreak. medRxiv 2020.09.01.20186320.
79.
Rosielle K, Bergwerff J, Schreurs AMF, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infertility patients and endometriosis patients in the Netherlands. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43:747–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
80.
Grens H, de Bruin JP, Huppelschoten A, Kremer JAM. Fertility workup with video consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic: pilot quantitative and qualitative study. JMIR Formative Research. 2022;6: e32000.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Treatment suspension due to the coronavirus pandemic and mental health of infertile patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Authors
Elnaz Iranifard
Atefeh Yas
Elahe Mansouri Ghezelhesari
Ali Taghipour
Malihe Mahmoudinia
Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17628-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Dietary carotenoids intake and sex differences in relation to chronic kidney disease a cross-sectional assessment in the NHANES study

Research

Temporal change in prevalence of BMI categories in India: patterns across States and Union territories of India, 1999–2021

Research

Associations between Life’s Essential 8 and abdominal aortic calcification among US Adults: a cross-sectional study

Research

Cannabis use and dependence among festival attendees: results from the French OCTOPUS survey

Research

School health promotion and fruit and vegetable consumption in secondary schools: a repeated cross-sectional multilevel study

Research highlight

Research highlight: cultivating community-based participatory research (CBPR) to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic: an illustrative example of partnership and topic prioritization in the food services industry