Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cardiology and Therapy 2/2024

Open Access 17-04-2024 | Angiography | Original Research

Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Complex PCI: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Authors: Mohamed Hamed, Sheref Mohamed, Mohamed Mahmoud, Jonathan Kahan, Amr Mohsen, Faisal Rahman, Waleed Kayani, Fernando Alfonso, Emmanuel S. Brilakis, Islam Y. Elgendy, Mamas A. Mamas, Ayman Elbadawi

Published in: Cardiology and Therapy | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Trials evaluating the role of intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex coronary artery disease have yielded mixed results. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of intravascular imaging specifically intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with those from conventional coronary angiography in complex PCI.

Methods

Comprehensive electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed until March 2023 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing intravascular imaging with coronary angiography in patients undergoing complex PCI. Complex PCI was defined per each study, and included PCI for American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) type B2/C lesions, unprotected left main coronary artery disease, or multivessel stenting. The primary study outcome was major adverse clinical events (MACE).

Results

The meta-analysis included 10 RCTs with a total of 6615 patients (3576 in the intravascular imaging group and 3039 in the coronary angiography group). The weighted mean-follow up was 28.9 months. Compared with coronary angiography, intravascular imaging reduced MACE (8% vs. 13.3%; relative risk [RR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54–0.73), cardiac death (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.31–0.73), definite/probable stent thrombosis (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.24–0.97), target vessel revascularization (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46–0.83), and target lesion revascularization (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47–0.79). There was no difference between both groups in all-cause death (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.53–1.18) and myocardial infarction (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.61–1.04).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing complex PCI, intravascular imaging—specifically IVUS—reduced MACE by decreasing the incidence of cardiac death, stent thrombosis, and target vessel and target lesion revascularization.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG, et al. Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(2):409–14.PubMedCrossRef Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG, et al. Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(2):409–14.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Patel MR, Marso SP, Dai D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in elderly patients undergoing revascularization of chronic total coronary occlusions: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2005–2008. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(10):1054–61.PubMedCrossRef Patel MR, Marso SP, Dai D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in elderly patients undergoing revascularization of chronic total coronary occlusions: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2005–2008. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(10):1054–61.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Van den Branden BJ, Rahel BM, Laarman GJ, et al. Five-year clinical outcome after primary stenting of totally occluded native coronary arteries: a randomised comparison of bare metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions (PRISON II study). EuroIntervention. 2012;7(10):1189–96.PubMedCrossRef Van den Branden BJ, Rahel BM, Laarman GJ, et al. Five-year clinical outcome after primary stenting of totally occluded native coronary arteries: a randomised comparison of bare metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions (PRISON II study). EuroIntervention. 2012;7(10):1189–96.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rathore S, Katoh O, Matsuo H, et al. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(2):124–32.PubMedCrossRef Rathore S, Katoh O, Matsuo H, et al. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(2):124–32.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ramadan R, Boden WE, Kinlay S. Management of left main coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(7):e008151. Ramadan R, Boden WE, Kinlay S. Management of left main coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(7):e008151.
6.
go back to reference Park DW, Park SJ. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: does procedural fine-tuning make a relevant clinical benefit? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5):e005293. Park DW, Park SJ. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: does procedural fine-tuning make a relevant clinical benefit? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5):e005293.
7.
go back to reference Yamamoto K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, et al. Optimal intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. JACC Asia. 2023;3(2):211–25. Yamamoto K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, et al. Optimal intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. JACC Asia. 2023;3(2):211–25.
8.
go back to reference Gaster AL, Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Larsen J, et al. Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study. Heart. 2003;89(9):1043–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gaster AL, Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Larsen J, et al. Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study. Heart. 2003;89(9):1043–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Darmoch F, Alraies MC, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5): e013678.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Darmoch F, Alraies MC, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5): e013678.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference De Franco AC, Nissen SE. Coronary intravascular ultrasound: implications for understanding the development and potential regression of atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(10A):7M–20M.PubMedCrossRef De Franco AC, Nissen SE. Coronary intravascular ultrasound: implications for understanding the development and potential regression of atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(10A):7M–20M.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Elgendy IY, Ha LD, Elbadawi A, et al. Temporal trends in inpatient use of intravascular imaging among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):913–5.PubMedCrossRef Elgendy IY, Ha LD, Elbadawi A, et al. Temporal trends in inpatient use of intravascular imaging among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):913–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e4–17.PubMed Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e4–17.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Räber L, Mintz SG, Koskinas CK, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(6):656–77. Räber L, Mintz SG, Koskinas CK, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(6):656–77.
14.
go back to reference Johnson WT, Räber L, Di Mario C, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(5):434–51.PubMedCrossRef Johnson WT, Räber L, Di Mario C, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(5):434–51.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jakabcin J, Spacek R, Bystron M, et al. Long-term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75(4):578–83.PubMedCrossRef Jakabcin J, Spacek R, Bystron M, et al. Long-term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75(4):578–83.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. Am Heart J. 2013;165(1):65–72.PubMedCrossRef Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. Am Heart J. 2013;165(1):65–72.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kim BK, Shin DH, Hong MK, et al. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(7): e002592.PubMedCrossRef Kim BK, Shin DH, Hong MK, et al. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(7): e002592.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tian NL, Gami SK, Ye F, et al. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study. EuroIntervention. 2015;10(12):1409–17.PubMedCrossRef Tian NL, Gami SK, Ye F, et al. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study. EuroIntervention. 2015;10(12):1409–17.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hong SJ, Mintz GS, Ahn CM, et al. Effect of Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: 5-year follow-up of the IVUS-XPL randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(1):62–71.PubMedCrossRef Hong SJ, Mintz GS, Ahn CM, et al. Effect of Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: 5-year follow-up of the IVUS-XPL randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(1):62–71.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gao XF, Ge Z, Kong XQ, et al. 3-year outcomes of the ULTIMATE trial comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(3):247–57.PubMedCrossRef Gao XF, Ge Z, Kong XQ, et al. 3-year outcomes of the ULTIMATE trial comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(3):247–57.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, et al. Intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided complex PCI. N Engl J Med. 2023:388(18):1668–79. Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, et al. Intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided complex PCI. N Engl J Med. 2023:388(18):1668–79.
22.
go back to reference Tan Q, Wang Q, Liu D, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided unprotected left main coronary artery stenting in the elderly. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(5):549–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tan Q, Wang Q, Liu D, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided unprotected left main coronary artery stenting in the elderly. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(5):549–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS, et al. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(4):369–76.PubMedCrossRef Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS, et al. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(4):369–76.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Liu XM, Yang ZM, Liu XK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: a single-center randomized trial. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;21(2):83–90.PubMed Liu XM, Yang ZM, Liu XK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: a single-center randomized trial. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;21(2):83–90.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Little WC, et al. Incidence of coronary stent thrombosis based on academic research consortium definitions. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(6):683–8.PubMedCrossRef Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Little WC, et al. Incidence of coronary stent thrombosis based on academic research consortium definitions. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(6):683–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018;137(24):2635–50.PubMedCrossRef Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018;137(24):2635–50.PubMedCrossRef
28.
30.
go back to reference Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(4): e003700.PubMedCrossRef Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(4): e003700.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Buccheri S, Franchina G, Romano S, et al. Clinical outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of 31 studies and 17,882 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(24):2488–98.PubMedCrossRef Buccheri S, Franchina G, Romano S, et al. Clinical outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of 31 studies and 17,882 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(24):2488–98.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Shin DH, Hong SJ, Mintz GS, et al. Effects of intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: meta-analysis with individual patient-level data from 2,345 randomized patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(21):2232–9.PubMedCrossRef Shin DH, Hong SJ, Mintz GS, et al. Effects of intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: meta-analysis with individual patient-level data from 2,345 randomized patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(21):2232–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Elgendy IY, Gad M, Mintz GS. Meta-analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary disease. Am J Cardiol. 2020;1(128):92–3.CrossRef Elgendy IY, Gad M, Mintz GS. Meta-analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary disease. Am J Cardiol. 2020;1(128):92–3.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guidance is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction for drug-eluting stent implantation—insights from an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ J. 2019;83(6):1410–3.PubMedCrossRef Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guidance is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction for drug-eluting stent implantation—insights from an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ J. 2019;83(6):1410–3.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bhogal S, Hashim H, Merdler I, et al. Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023;55:96–8.PubMedCrossRef Bhogal S, Hashim H, Merdler I, et al. Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023;55:96–8.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Barus P, Piasecki A, Gumiezna K, et al. Multimodality OCT, IVUS and FFR evaluation of coronary intermediate grade lesions in women vs. men. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1021023.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Barus P, Piasecki A, Gumiezna K, et al. Multimodality OCT, IVUS and FFR evaluation of coronary intermediate grade lesions in women vs. men. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1021023.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Chamié D, Costa JR, Damiani LP, et al. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound and angiography to guide percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(3):e009452.PubMedCrossRef Chamié D, Costa JR, Damiani LP, et al. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound and angiography to guide percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(3):e009452.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kang D-Y, Ahn J-M, Yun S-C, et al. Optical coherence tomography-guided or intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: the OCTIVUS randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2023;148(16):1195–206.PubMedCrossRef Kang D-Y, Ahn J-M, Yun S-C, et al. Optical coherence tomography-guided or intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: the OCTIVUS randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2023;148(16):1195–206.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Lee PH, Ahn JM, Chang M, et al. Left main coronary artery disease: secular trends in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(11):1233–46.PubMedCrossRef Lee PH, Ahn JM, Chang M, et al. Left main coronary artery disease: secular trends in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(11):1233–46.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Carrie D, Eltchaninoff H, Lefevre T, et al. Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with paclitaxel-eluting stents: the FRIEND (French multicentre RegIstry for stenting of uNprotecteD LMCA stenosis) registry. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(6):680–8.PubMedCrossRef Carrie D, Eltchaninoff H, Lefevre T, et al. Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with paclitaxel-eluting stents: the FRIEND (French multicentre RegIstry for stenting of uNprotecteD LMCA stenosis) registry. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(6):680–8.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Alberti A, Giudice P, Gelera A, et al. Understanding the economic impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(2):185–93.PubMedCrossRef Alberti A, Giudice P, Gelera A, et al. Understanding the economic impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(2):185–93.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ali ZA, Maehara A, Genereux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2618–28.PubMedCrossRef Ali ZA, Maehara A, Genereux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2618–28.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Allali A, Traboulsi H, Sulimov DS, et al. Feasibility and safety of minimal-contrast IVUS-guided rotational atherectomy for complex calcified coronary artery disease. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110(10):1668–79.PubMedCrossRef Allali A, Traboulsi H, Sulimov DS, et al. Feasibility and safety of minimal-contrast IVUS-guided rotational atherectomy for complex calcified coronary artery disease. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110(10):1668–79.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sakakura K, Yamamoto K, Taniguchi Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound enhances the safety of rotational atherectomy. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19(3 Pt A):286–91.PubMedCrossRef Sakakura K, Yamamoto K, Taniguchi Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound enhances the safety of rotational atherectomy. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19(3 Pt A):286–91.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Ladwiniec A, Walsh SJ, Holm NR, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to guide left main stem intervention: a NOBLE trial substudy. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(3):201–9.PubMedCrossRef Ladwiniec A, Walsh SJ, Holm NR, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to guide left main stem intervention: a NOBLE trial substudy. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(3):201–9.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Cortese B, Piraino D, Gentile D, et al. Intravascular imaging for left main stem assessment: an update on the most recent clinical data. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100(7):1220–8.PubMedCrossRef Cortese B, Piraino D, Gentile D, et al. Intravascular imaging for left main stem assessment: an update on the most recent clinical data. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100(7):1220–8.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Leesar MA, Hage FG. IVUS guidance on optimal stent deployment: new insights and perspectives. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(2):217–9.PubMedCrossRef Leesar MA, Hage FG. IVUS guidance on optimal stent deployment: new insights and perspectives. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(2):217–9.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Zhou J, Liew D, Duffy SJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a health economic analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021;14(5):e006789.PubMedCrossRef Zhou J, Liew D, Duffy SJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a health economic analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021;14(5):e006789.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Mueller C, Hodgson JM, Schindler C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intracoronary ultrasound for percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(2):143–7.PubMedCrossRef Mueller C, Hodgson JM, Schindler C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intracoronary ultrasound for percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(2):143–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Complex PCI: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Authors
Mohamed Hamed
Sheref Mohamed
Mohamed Mahmoud
Jonathan Kahan
Amr Mohsen
Faisal Rahman
Waleed Kayani
Fernando Alfonso
Emmanuel S. Brilakis
Islam Y. Elgendy
Mamas A. Mamas
Ayman Elbadawi
Publication date
17-04-2024
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Cardiology and Therapy / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 2193-8261
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6544
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-024-00364-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Cardiology and Therapy 2/2024 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.