Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Anemia | Leukemia (PH Wiernik, Section Editor)

Management of Myelofibrosis: from Diagnosis to New Target Therapies

Authors: Alessandra Iurlo, MD, PhD, Daniele Cattaneo, MD, Cristina Bucelli, MD

Published in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Opinion statement

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal disorder of the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell, whose clinical manifestations can be extremely heterogeneous, including cytopenias, organomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and cachexia. Median survival ranges from approximately 3.5 to 5.5 years; while the most frequent cause of death is the evolution to acute myeloid leukemia, also other conditions such as progression without transformation, complications due to cytopenias including infections or bleeding, and cardiovascular events may be fatal. Myelofibrosis is still orphan of curative treatments: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), the only therapeutic approach that has clearly demonstrated an impact on disease progression, is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality and only a minority of patients is eligible for such an intensive procedure. While the discovery of the crucial role of JAK2 mutations and the consequent clinical use of JAK inhibitors has led to a dramatic improvement of symptoms control and quality of life, yet these drugs do not significantly modify the natural history of the disease. A better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis will hopefully foster the development of new targeted therapies aimed at improving MF prognosis. Herein, we review the most recent advances about JAK inhibitors and other molecules which are under investigation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jacobson RJ, Salo A, Fialkow PJ. Agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells with secondary myelofibrosis. Blood. 1978;51:189–94.CrossRefPubMed Jacobson RJ, Salo A, Fialkow PJ. Agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells with secondary myelofibrosis. Blood. 1978;51:189–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Barosi G. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: diagnostic definition and prognostic classification for clinical studies and treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2954–70.PubMedCrossRef Barosi G. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: diagnostic definition and prognostic classification for clinical studies and treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2954–70.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference •• Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405 The new 2016 revision of the WHO classification provided new diagnostic criteria for all BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, in particular for primary myelofibrosis. •• Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405 The new 2016 revision of the WHO classification provided new diagnostic criteria for all BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, in particular for primary myelofibrosis.
4.
go back to reference Barbui T, Thiele J, Passamonti F, et al. Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3179–84.PubMedCrossRef Barbui T, Thiele J, Passamonti F, et al. Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3179–84.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Leukemia. 2008;22:437–8.PubMedCrossRef Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Leukemia. 2008;22:437–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1779–90.PubMedCrossRef Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1779–90.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ, et al. Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet. 2005;365:1054–61.PubMedCrossRef Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ, et al. Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet. 2005;365:1054–61.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tefferi A. JAK2 mutations and clinical practice in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer J. 2007;13:366–71.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A. JAK2 mutations and clinical practice in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer J. 2007;13:366–71.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Levine RL, Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Gilliland DG. Role of JAK2 in the pathogenesis and therapy of myeloproliferative disorders. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:673–83.PubMedCrossRef Levine RL, Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Gilliland DG. Role of JAK2 in the pathogenesis and therapy of myeloproliferative disorders. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:673–83.PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Pardanani AD, Levine RL, Lasho T, et al. MPL515 mutations in myeloproliferative and other myeloid disorders: a study of 1182 patients. Blood. 2006;108:3472–6.PubMedCrossRef Pardanani AD, Levine RL, Lasho T, et al. MPL515 mutations in myeloproliferative and other myeloid disorders: a study of 1182 patients. Blood. 2006;108:3472–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:2379–90.CrossRef Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:2379–90.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:2391–405.CrossRef Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:2391–405.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke CM, et al. CALR vs JAK2 vs MPL-mutated or triple-negative myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons. Leukemia. 2014;28:1472–7.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke CM, et al. CALR vs JAK2 vs MPL-mutated or triple-negative myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons. Leukemia. 2014;28:1472–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nangalia J, Green TR. The evolving genomic landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014:287–96.PubMedCrossRef Nangalia J, Green TR. The evolving genomic landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014:287–96.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vainchenker W, Delhommeau F, Constantinescu SN, Bernard OA. New mutations and pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011;118:1–3.CrossRef Vainchenker W, Delhommeau F, Constantinescu SN, Bernard OA. New mutations and pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011;118:1–3.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vannucchi AM, Lasho TL, Guglielmelli P, et al. Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27:1861–9.PubMedCrossRef Vannucchi AM, Lasho TL, Guglielmelli P, et al. Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27:1861–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Gianelli U. Blast transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk factors, biological findings, and targeted therapeutic options. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1839.PubMedCentralCrossRef Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Gianelli U. Blast transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk factors, biological findings, and targeted therapeutic options. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1839.PubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113:2895–901.CrossRefPubMed Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113:2895–901.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWGMRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115:1703–8.CrossRefPubMed Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWGMRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115:1703–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:392–7.CrossRefPubMed Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:392–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:310–8.CrossRefPubMed Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:310–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference •• Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70 This is a new prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis, which considers the most recent information about the molecular landscape of this disease.PubMedCrossRef •• Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70 This is a new prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis, which considers the most recent information about the molecular landscape of this disease.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1631–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1631–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
go back to reference •• Iurlo A, Elli EM, Palandri F, et al. Integrating clinical, morphological, and molecular data to assess prognosis in patients with primary myelofibrosis at diagnosis: a practical approach. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37:424–33 This is a new prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis, more simple, and easier to use than the previous ones as it only required information that represent the good clinical practice in the management of this disease.PubMedCrossRef •• Iurlo A, Elli EM, Palandri F, et al. Integrating clinical, morphological, and molecular data to assess prognosis in patients with primary myelofibrosis at diagnosis: a practical approach. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37:424–33 This is a new prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis, more simple, and easier to use than the previous ones as it only required information that represent the good clinical practice in the management of this disease.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference •• Passamonti F, Giorgino T, Mora B, et al. A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2017;31:2726–31 This is the first prognostic scoring system which was specifically developed for post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.CrossRefPubMed •• Passamonti F, Giorgino T, Mora B, et al. A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2017;31:2726–31 This is the first prognostic scoring system which was specifically developed for post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference •• Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia. 2018;32:1057–69 The most recent recommendations for the management of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef •• Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia. 2018;32:1057–69 The most recent recommendations for the management of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Kröger NM, Deeg JH, Olavarria E, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group. Leukemia. 2015;29:2126–33.PubMedCrossRef Kröger NM, Deeg JH, Olavarria E, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group. Leukemia. 2015;29:2126–33.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Quintás-Cardama A, Vaddi K, Liu P, et al. Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:3109–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Quintás-Cardama A, Vaddi K, Liu P, et al. Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:3109–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Marchetti M, Barosi G, Cervantes F, et al. Which patients with myelofibrosis should receive ruxolitinib therapy? ELN-SIE evidence-based recommendations. Leukemia. 2017;31:882–8.PubMedCrossRef Marchetti M, Barosi G, Cervantes F, et al. Which patients with myelofibrosis should receive ruxolitinib therapy? ELN-SIE evidence-based recommendations. Leukemia. 2017;31:882–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
33.
go back to reference Harrison C, Kiladjian J-J, Kathrin H, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:609–19.CrossRef Harrison C, Kiladjian J-J, Kathrin H, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:609–19.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference •• Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, et al. Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2016;30:1701–7 The most recent update of the phase III COMFORT-II trial.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef •• Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, et al. Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2016;30:1701–7 The most recent update of the phase III COMFORT-II trial.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
go back to reference •• Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:55 The most recent update of the phase III COMFORT-I trial.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef •• Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:55 The most recent update of the phase III COMFORT-I trial.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Mead AJ, Milojkovic D, Knapper S, et al. Response to ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-1-, intermediate-2-, and high-risk myelofibrosis: results of the UK ROBUST Trial. Br J Haematol. 2015;170:29–39.PubMedCrossRef Mead AJ, Milojkovic D, Knapper S, et al. Response to ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-1-, intermediate-2-, and high-risk myelofibrosis: results of the UK ROBUST Trial. Br J Haematol. 2015;170:29–39.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, le Coutre P, et al. Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial. Haematologica. 2016;101:1065–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, le Coutre P, et al. Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial. Haematologica. 2016;101:1065–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kvasnicka H, Thiele J, Bueso-Ramos CE, et al. Long-term intervention effects on bone marrow morphology in myelofibrosis: patients treated with ruxolitinib and best available therapy [Abstract S591]. Haematologica. 2013;98:249. Kvasnicka H, Thiele J, Bueso-Ramos CE, et al. Long-term intervention effects on bone marrow morphology in myelofibrosis: patients treated with ruxolitinib and best available therapy [Abstract S591]. Haematologica. 2013;98:249.
39.
go back to reference Wilkins BS, Radia D, Woodley C, et al. Resolution of bone marrow fibrosis in a patient receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor treatment with ruxolitinib. Haematologica. 2013;98:1872–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wilkins BS, Radia D, Woodley C, et al. Resolution of bone marrow fibrosis in a patient receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor treatment with ruxolitinib. Haematologica. 2013;98:1872–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
41.
go back to reference Molica M, Serrao A, Saracino R, et al. Disappearance of fibrosis in secondary myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib treatment: new endpoint to achieve? Ann Hematol. 2014;93:1951–2.PubMedCrossRef Molica M, Serrao A, Saracino R, et al. Disappearance of fibrosis in secondary myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib treatment: new endpoint to achieve? Ann Hematol. 2014;93:1951–2.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Boiocchi L, et al. Clinical and morphologic features in five post-polycythemic myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib. Ann Hematol. 2015;94:1749–51.PubMedCrossRef Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Boiocchi L, et al. Clinical and morphologic features in five post-polycythemic myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib. Ann Hematol. 2015;94:1749–51.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Gianelli U, Vener C, Bossi A, et al. The European Consensus on grading of bone marrow fibrosis allows a better prognostication of patients with primary myelofibrosis. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1193–202.PubMedCrossRef Gianelli U, Vener C, Bossi A, et al. The European Consensus on grading of bone marrow fibrosis allows a better prognostication of patients with primary myelofibrosis. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1193–202.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Mora B, Guglielmelli P, Rumi E, et al. Impact of bone marrow fibrosis grade in post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: A study of the MYSEC group. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:E1–3.PubMedCrossRef Mora B, Guglielmelli P, Rumi E, et al. Impact of bone marrow fibrosis grade in post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: A study of the MYSEC group. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:E1–3.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bose P, Verstovsek S. Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018;13:164–72.PubMedCrossRef Bose P, Verstovsek S. Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018;13:164–72.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Heine A, Brossart P, Wolf D. Ruxolitinib is a potent immunosuppressive compound: is it time for anti-infective prophylaxis? Blood. 2013;122:3843–4.PubMedCrossRef Heine A, Brossart P, Wolf D. Ruxolitinib is a potent immunosuppressive compound: is it time for anti-infective prophylaxis? Blood. 2013;122:3843–4.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Heine A, Held SA, Daecke SN, et al. The JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib impairs dendritic cell function in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2013;122:1192–202.PubMedCrossRef Heine A, Held SA, Daecke SN, et al. The JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib impairs dendritic cell function in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2013;122:1192–202.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Elli EM, Baratè C, Mendicino F, Palandri F, Palumbo GA. Mechanisms Underlying the Anti-inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Activity of Ruxolitinib. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Elli EM, Baratè C, Mendicino F, Palandri F, Palumbo GA. Mechanisms Underlying the Anti-inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Activity of Ruxolitinib. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Caocci G, Murgia F, Podda L, et al. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection following ruxolitinib treatment in a patient with myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2014;28:225–7.PubMedCrossRef Caocci G, Murgia F, Podda L, et al. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection following ruxolitinib treatment in a patient with myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2014;28:225–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Wysham NG, Sullivan DR, Allada G. An opportunistic infection associated with ruxolitinib, a novel janus kinase 1,2 inhibitor. Chest. 2013;143:1478–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wysham NG, Sullivan DR, Allada G. An opportunistic infection associated with ruxolitinib, a novel janus kinase 1,2 inhibitor. Chest. 2013;143:1478–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Tong LX, Jackson J, Kerstetter J, Worswick SD. Reactivation of herpes simplex virus infection in a patient undergoing ruxolitinib treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:e59–60.PubMedCrossRef Tong LX, Jackson J, Kerstetter J, Worswick SD. Reactivation of herpes simplex virus infection in a patient undergoing ruxolitinib treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:e59–60.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Hultcrantz M, Lund SH, Andersson TM, Björkholm M, Kristinsson S. Myeloproliferative neoplasms and infections; a population-based study on 9,665 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms diagnosed in Sweden 1987–2009 [Abstract 666]. Haematologica. 2015;100:260–1. Hultcrantz M, Lund SH, Andersson TM, Björkholm M, Kristinsson S. Myeloproliferative neoplasms and infections; a population-based study on 9,665 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms diagnosed in Sweden 1987–2009 [Abstract 666]. Haematologica. 2015;100:260–1.
53.
go back to reference Sant'Antonio E, Bonifacio M, Breccia M, Rumi E. A journey through infectious risk associated with ruxolitinib. Br J Haematol. 2019;187:286–95.PubMedCrossRef Sant'Antonio E, Bonifacio M, Breccia M, Rumi E. A journey through infectious risk associated with ruxolitinib. Br J Haematol. 2019;187:286–95.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference •• Porpaczy E, Tripolt S, Hoelbl-Kovacic A, et al. Aggressive B-cell lymphomas in patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood. 2018;132:694–706 This is the first report of an increased risk of aggressive B cell lymphoma development during ruxolitinib treatment in primary myelofibrosis patients.PubMedCrossRef •• Porpaczy E, Tripolt S, Hoelbl-Kovacic A, et al. Aggressive B-cell lymphomas in patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood. 2018;132:694–706 This is the first report of an increased risk of aggressive B cell lymphoma development during ruxolitinib treatment in primary myelofibrosis patients.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Palandri F, Breccia M, Bonifacio M, et al. Life after ruxolitinib: reasons for discontinuation, impact of disease phase, and outcomes in 218 patients with myelofibrosis. Cancer. 2019 Dec;20 [epub ahead of print]. Palandri F, Breccia M, Bonifacio M, et al. Life after ruxolitinib: reasons for discontinuation, impact of disease phase, and outcomes in 218 patients with myelofibrosis. Cancer. 2019 Dec;20 [epub ahead of print].
57.
go back to reference Pardanani A, Lasho T, Smith G, et al. CYT387, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor: in vitro assessment of kinase selectivity and preclinical studies using cell lines and primary cells from polycythemia vera patients. Leukemia. 2009;23:1441–5.PubMedCrossRef Pardanani A, Lasho T, Smith G, et al. CYT387, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor: in vitro assessment of kinase selectivity and preclinical studies using cell lines and primary cells from polycythemia vera patients. Leukemia. 2009;23:1441–5.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Tyner JW, Bumm TG, Deininger J, et al. CYT387, a novel JAK2 inhibitor, induces hematologic responses and normalizes inflammatory cytokines in murine myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:5232–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tyner JW, Bumm TG, Deininger J, et al. CYT387, a novel JAK2 inhibitor, induces hematologic responses and normalizes inflammatory cytokines in murine myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:5232–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
60.
go back to reference Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Roberts AW, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of momelotinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1034–7.CrossRef Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Roberts AW, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of momelotinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1034–7.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Pardanani A, Abdelrahman RA, Finke C, et al. Genetic determinants of response and survival in momelotinib-treated patients with myelofibrosis Leukemia. 2015;29:741–4. Pardanani A, Abdelrahman RA, Finke C, et al. Genetic determinants of response and survival in momelotinib-treated patients with myelofibrosis Leukemia. 2015;29:741–4.
62.
go back to reference Spiegel JY, McNamara C, Kennedy JA, et al. Impact of genomic alterations on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients undergoing JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood Adv. 2017;1:1729–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Spiegel JY, McNamara C, Kennedy JA, et al. Impact of genomic alterations on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients undergoing JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood Adv. 2017;1:1729–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Gupta V, Mesa RA, Deininger MW, et al. A phase 1/2, open-label study evaluating twice-daily administration of momelotinib in myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2017;102:94–102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gupta V, Mesa RA, Deininger MW, et al. A phase 1/2, open-label study evaluating twice-daily administration of momelotinib in myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2017;102:94–102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Catalano JV, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III randomized trial of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Janus kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3844–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Catalano JV, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III randomized trial of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Janus kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3844–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e73–81.PubMedCrossRef Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e73–81.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Hood J, Cao J, Chow C, et al. Development of TG101348 for the treatment of JAK2-driven malignancies. J Clin Onc. 2008;26(Suppl 15):7083.CrossRef Hood J, Cao J, Chow C, et al. Development of TG101348 for the treatment of JAK2-driven malignancies. J Clin Onc. 2008;26(Suppl 15):7083.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Wernig G, Kharas MG, Okabe R, et al. Efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in treatment of a murine model of JAK2V617F-induced polycythemia vera. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:311–20.PubMedCrossRef Wernig G, Kharas MG, Okabe R, et al. Efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in treatment of a murine model of JAK2V617F-induced polycythemia vera. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:311–20.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Jamieson C, et al. Safety and efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:789–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Jamieson C, et al. Safety and efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:789–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Jamieson C, et al. A phase 2 randomized dose-ranging study of the JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e335.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Jamieson C, et al. A phase 2 randomized dose-ranging study of the JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e335.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi AM, et al. Janus kinase-2 inhibitor fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (JAKARTA-2): a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e317–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi AM, et al. Janus kinase-2 inhibitor fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (JAKARTA-2): a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e317–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
71.
go back to reference Pardanani A, Harrison C, Cortes JE, et al. Safety and efficacy of fedratinib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:643–51.PubMedCrossRef Pardanani A, Harrison C, Cortes JE, et al. Safety and efficacy of fedratinib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:643–51.PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Jamieson C, et al. Case series of potential Wernicke's encephalopathy in patients treated with fedratinib. Blood. 2017;130:4197.CrossRef Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Jamieson C, et al. Case series of potential Wernicke's encephalopathy in patients treated with fedratinib. Blood. 2017;130:4197.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Verstovsek S, Harrison CN, Barosi G, Kiladjian JJ, Buglio D, Chia V. FREEDOM: a phase 3b efficacy and safety study of fedratinib in intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May;26 [epub ahead of print]. Verstovsek S, Harrison CN, Barosi G, Kiladjian JJ, Buglio D, Chia V. FREEDOM: a phase 3b efficacy and safety study of fedratinib in intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May;26 [epub ahead of print].
75.
go back to reference Singer JW, Al-Fayoumi S, Ma H, et al. Comprehensive kinase profile of pacritinib, a non myelosuppressive Janus kinase 2 inhibitor. J Exp Pharmacol. 2016;8:11–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Singer JW, Al-Fayoumi S, Ma H, et al. Comprehensive kinase profile of pacritinib, a non myelosuppressive Janus kinase 2 inhibitor. J Exp Pharmacol. 2016;8:11–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Verstovsek S, Odenike O, Singer JW, et al. Phase 1/2 study of pacritinib, a next generation JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis or other myeloid malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Verstovsek S, Odenike O, Singer JW, et al. Phase 1/2 study of pacritinib, a next generation JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis or other myeloid malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Komrokji RS, Seymour JF, Roberts AW, et al. Results of a phase 2 study of pacritinib (SB1518), a JAK2/JAK2(V617F) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;125:2649–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Komrokji RS, Seymour JF, Roberts AW, et al. Results of a phase 2 study of pacritinib (SB1518), a JAK2/JAK2(V617F) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;125:2649–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Mead A, et al. Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e225–36.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Mead A, et al. Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e225–36.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
79.
go back to reference Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, et al. Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:652–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, et al. Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:652–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
80.
go back to reference Diaz AE, Mesa RA. Pacritinib and its use in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis who have thrombocytopenia. Future Oncol. 2018;14:797–807.PubMedCrossRef Diaz AE, Mesa RA. Pacritinib and its use in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis who have thrombocytopenia. Future Oncol. 2018;14:797–807.PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R, Mascarenhas J, et al. A phase 2 study of Cpi-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):5481.CrossRef Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R, Mascarenhas J, et al. A phase 2 study of Cpi-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):5481.CrossRef
83.
go back to reference Kleppe M, Koche R, Zou L, et al. Dual targeting of oncogenic activation and inflammatory signaling increases therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:29–43e7.PubMedCrossRef Kleppe M, Koche R, Zou L, et al. Dual targeting of oncogenic activation and inflammatory signaling increases therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:29–43e7.PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Sashida G, Wang C, Tomioka T, et al. The loss of Ezh2 drives the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis and sensitizes tumor-initiating cells to bromodomain inhibition. J Exp Med. 2016;213:1459–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sashida G, Wang C, Tomioka T, et al. The loss of Ezh2 drives the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis and sensitizes tumor-initiating cells to bromodomain inhibition. J Exp Med. 2016;213:1459–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Mascarenhas J, Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R, et al. MANIFEST, a phase 2 study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor (BETi), as monotherapy or “add-on” to ruxolitinib, in patients with refractory or intolerant advanced myelofibrosis (abstract). Blood. 2019. Mascarenhas J, Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R, et al. MANIFEST, a phase 2 study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor (BETi), as monotherapy or “add-on” to ruxolitinib, in patients with refractory or intolerant advanced myelofibrosis (abstract). Blood. 2019.
86.
go back to reference Harrison CN, Patriarca A, Mascarenhas J, et al. Preliminary report of MANIFEST, a phase 2 study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor (BETi), in combination with ruxolitinib in Jak inhibitor (JAKi) treatment naïve myelofibrosis patients (abstract). Blood. 2019. Harrison CN, Patriarca A, Mascarenhas J, et al. Preliminary report of MANIFEST, a phase 2 study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor (BETi), in combination with ruxolitinib in Jak inhibitor (JAKi) treatment naïve myelofibrosis patients (abstract). Blood. 2019.
87.
go back to reference Bose P, Daver N, Pemmaraju N, et al. Sotatercept (ACE-011) alone and in combination with ruxolitinib in patients (pts) with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia. Blood. 2017;130(suppl 1):255. Bose P, Daver N, Pemmaraju N, et al. Sotatercept (ACE-011) alone and in combination with ruxolitinib in patients (pts) with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia. Blood. 2017;130(suppl 1):255.
88.
go back to reference Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Foltz LM, et al. Phase 2 trial of PRM-151, an anti-fibrotic agent, in patients with myelofibrosis: stage 1 results. Blood. 2014;124(21):713.CrossRef Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Foltz LM, et al. Phase 2 trial of PRM-151, an anti-fibrotic agent, in patients with myelofibrosis: stage 1 results. Blood. 2014;124(21):713.CrossRef
89.
go back to reference Gangat N, Stein BL, Marinaccio C, et al. Alisertib (MLN8237), an oral selective inhibitor of aurora kinase A, has clinical activity and restores GATA1 expression in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):688.CrossRef Gangat N, Stein BL, Marinaccio C, et al. Alisertib (MLN8237), an oral selective inhibitor of aurora kinase A, has clinical activity and restores GATA1 expression in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):688.CrossRef
90.
go back to reference Mascarenhas J, Komrokji RS, Cavo M, et al. Imetelstat is effective treatment for patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis who have relapsed on or are refractory to janus kinase inhibitor therapy: results of a phase 2 randomized study of two dose levels. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):685.CrossRef Mascarenhas J, Komrokji RS, Cavo M, et al. Imetelstat is effective treatment for patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis who have relapsed on or are refractory to janus kinase inhibitor therapy: results of a phase 2 randomized study of two dose levels. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):685.CrossRef
91.
go back to reference Gerds AT, Tauchi T, Ritchie E, et al. Phase 1/2 trial of glasdegib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib [published correction appears in Leuk Res. 2019;81:105]. Leuk Res. 2019;79:38–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Gerds AT, Tauchi T, Ritchie E, et al. Phase 1/2 trial of glasdegib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib [published correction appears in Leuk Res. 2019;81:105]. Leuk Res. 2019;79:38–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
92.
go back to reference Gupta V, Harrison CN, Hasselbalch H, et al. Phase 1b/2 study of the efficacy and safety of sonidegib (LDE225) in combination with ruxolitinib (INC424) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;126:825.CrossRef Gupta V, Harrison CN, Hasselbalch H, et al. Phase 1b/2 study of the efficacy and safety of sonidegib (LDE225) in combination with ruxolitinib (INC424) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;126:825.CrossRef
93.
go back to reference Durrant ST, Nagler A, Guglielmelli P, et al. Results from HARMONY: an open-label, multicentre, 2-arm, phase 1b, dose-finding study assessing the safety and efficacy of the oral combination of ruxolitinib and buparlisib in patients with myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2019;104:e551–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Durrant ST, Nagler A, Guglielmelli P, et al. Results from HARMONY: an open-label, multicentre, 2-arm, phase 1b, dose-finding study assessing the safety and efficacy of the oral combination of ruxolitinib and buparlisib in patients with myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2019;104:e551–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
94.
go back to reference Daver NG, Kremyanskaya M, O’Connell C, et al. A phase 2 study of the safety and efficacy of INCB050465, a selective PI3Kd inhibitor, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):353.CrossRef Daver NG, Kremyanskaya M, O’Connell C, et al. A phase 2 study of the safety and efficacy of INCB050465, a selective PI3Kd inhibitor, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):353.CrossRef
95.
go back to reference Mascarenhas J, Lu M, Li T, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythaemia vera/essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Br J Haematol. 2013;161:68-75.PubMedCrossRef Mascarenhas J, Lu M, Li T, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythaemia vera/essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Br J Haematol. 2013;161:68-75.PubMedCrossRef
96.
go back to reference DeAngelo DJ, Mesa RA, Fiskus W, et al. Phase II trial of panobinostat, an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor in patients with primary myelofibrosis, post-essential thrombocythaemia, and post-polycythaemia vera myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:326–35.PubMedCrossRef DeAngelo DJ, Mesa RA, Fiskus W, et al. Phase II trial of panobinostat, an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor in patients with primary myelofibrosis, post-essential thrombocythaemia, and post-polycythaemia vera myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:326–35.PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Mascarenhas J, Sandy L, Lu M, et al. A phase II study of panobinostat in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2017;53:13–9.PubMedCrossRef Mascarenhas J, Sandy L, Lu M, et al. A phase II study of panobinostat in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2017;53:13–9.PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Mascarenhas J, Marcellino BK, Lu M, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat and ruxolitinib in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2020;88:106272.PubMedCrossRef Mascarenhas J, Marcellino BK, Lu M, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat and ruxolitinib in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2020;88:106272.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Management of Myelofibrosis: from Diagnosis to New Target Therapies
Authors
Alessandra Iurlo, MD, PhD
Daniele Cattaneo, MD
Cristina Bucelli, MD
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1527-2729
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00734-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Current Treatment Options in Oncology 6/2020 Go to the issue

Neuroendocrine Cancers (JR Strosberg, Section Editor)

Hereditary Syndromes in Neuroendocrine Tumors

Leukemia (PH Wiernik, Section Editor)

Biology and Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine