Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Acute Kidney Injury | Letter

Interleukin-26 is a promising biomarker of sepsis but is it always reliable?

Authors: Patrick M. Honore, Aude Mugisha, Leonel Barreto Gutierrez, Sebastien Redant, Keitiane Kaefer, Andrea Gallerani, David De Bels

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

We read with interest the recent article by Tu et al. concluding that interleukin-26 (IL-26) is a better predictor of 28-day mortality in septic patients when compared with C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) [1]. However, SOFA score remains the best predictor by far over IL-26. While we applaud the results of this study, we would like to make some comments. IL-26 is the most recently identified member of the IL-20 cytokine subfamily and is a promising mediator of inflammation overexpressed in activated or transformed T cells [2]. IL-26 has a molecular weight ranging between 19 and 36 kDa. Nearly half of critically ill patients especially those with septic shock have or develop acute kidney injury (AKI), and 20–25% will need renal replacement therapy (RRT) within the first week of their stay [3]. Out of the 52 septic patients in this study, several patients will develop AKI and necessitate continuous RRT (CRRT) [1]. The serum for IL-26 was taken on admission in the intensive care unit (ICU) in this study, and nothing can be said about the reliability of the admission level. Nevertheless, we would like to warn the clinician about daily monitoring of IL-26 like for CRP and PCT. CRRT is performed using membranes that have a cutoff value of 35–40 kDa, and therefore, some quantity of IL-26 will be eliminated by CRRT [4]. New highly adsorptive membranes (HAM) that can adsorb many molecules with a molecular weight above 35 kDa will even increase this removal [5]. This can mislead patient prognostication by artificially decreasing IL-26, but no studies have challenged this issue yet. Such studies should be done as there is already a long list of biomarkers in sepsis that are lacking reliability during CRRT [5]. To date, no single sepsis biomarker can be reliable during CRRT. While admission levels of IL-26 might be a good marker of severity and mortality of sepsis, this might not be the case for septic shock under CRRT [4, 5]. …
Literature
3.
go back to reference Peters E, Antonelli M, Wittebole X, Nanchal R, François B, Sakr Y, et al. A worldwide multicentre evaluation of the influence of deterioration or improvement of acute kidney injury on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with and without sepsis at ICU admission: results from The Intensive Care Over Nations audit. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2112-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peters E, Antonelli M, Wittebole X, Nanchal R, François B, Sakr Y, et al. A worldwide multicentre evaluation of the influence of deterioration or improvement of acute kidney injury on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with and without sepsis at ICU admission: results from The Intensive Care Over Nations audit. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):188. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13054-018-2112-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Interleukin-26 is a promising biomarker of sepsis but is it always reliable?
Authors
Patrick M. Honore
Aude Mugisha
Leonel Barreto Gutierrez
Sebastien Redant
Keitiane Kaefer
Andrea Gallerani
David De Bels
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2691-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Critical Care 1/2019 Go to the issue