Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original article

A visual quality control scale for clinical arterial spin labeling images

Authors: S. M. Fallatah, F. B. Pizzini, B. Gomez-Anson, J. Magerkurth, E. De Vita, S. Bisdas, H. R. Jäger, H. J. M. M. Mutsaerts, X. Golay

Published in: European Radiology Experimental | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Image-quality assessment is a fundamental step before clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance images. The aim of this study was to introduce a visual scoring system that provides a quality control standard for arterial spin labeling (ASL) and that can be applied to cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps, as well as to ancillary ASL images.

Methods

The proposed image quality control (QC) system had two components: (1) contrast-based QC (cQC), describing the visual contrast between anatomical structures; and (2) artifact-based QC (aQC), evaluating image quality of the CBF map for the presence of common types of artifacts. Three raters evaluated cQC and aQC for 158 quantitative signal targeting with alternating radiofrequency labelling of arterial regions (QUASAR) ASL scans (CBF, T1 relaxation rate, arterial blood volume, and arterial transient time). Spearman correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used.

Results

Intra/inter-rater agreement ranged from moderate to excellent; inter-rater ICC was 0.72 for cQC, 0.60 for aQC, and 0.74 for the combined QC (cQC + aQC). Intra-rater ICC was 0.90 for cQC; 0.80 for aQC, and 0.90 for the combined QC. Strong correlations were found between aQC and CBF maps quality (r = 0.75), and between aQC and cQC (r = 0.70). A QC score of 18 was optimal to discriminate between high and low quality clinical scans.

Conclusions

The proposed QC system provided high reproducibility and a reliable threshold for discarding low quality scans. Future research should compare this visual QC system with an automatic QC system.

Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X et al (2014) Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European Consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 73:102–116CrossRef

Borogovac A, Asllani I (2012) Arterial spin labeling (ASL) fMRI: advantages, theoretical constrains and experimental challenges in neurosciences. Int J Biomed Imaging 2012:818456PubMedPubMedCentral

Hendrikse J, Petersen ET, Golay X (2012) Vascular disorders: insights from arterial spin labeling. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 22:259–269CrossRef

Alsop DC, Dai W, Grossman M, Detre JA (2010) Arterial spin labeling blood flow MRI: its role in the early characterization of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 20:871–880CrossRef

Wang DJ, Chen Y, Fernández-Seara MA, Detre JA (2011) Potentials and challenges for arterial spin labeling in pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 337:359–366

Detre JA, Rao H, Wang DJ, Chen YF, Wang Z (2012) Applications of arterial spin labeled MRI in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1026–1037

Alsop DC, Detre JA (1996) Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16:1236–1249CrossRef

Fernández-Seara M, Edlow BL, Hoang A, Wang J, Feinberg DA, Detre JA (2008) Minimizing acquisition time of arterial spin labeling at 3T. Magn Reson Med 59:1467–1471

Petersen ET, Mouridsen K, Golay X (2010) The QUASAR reproducibility study, Part II: results from a multi-center Arterial Spin Labeling test-retest study. Neuroimage 49:104–113

10.

Mutsaerts HJ, van Osch MJ Zelaya FO et al (2015) Multi-vendor reliability of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI using a near-identical sequence: Implications for multi-center studies. Neuroimage 113:143–152

11.

Clement P, Mutsaerts HJ, Václavů L et al (2018) Variability of physiological brain perfusion in healthy subjects – A systematic review of modifiers. Considerations for multi-center ASL studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 38:1418–1437

12.

Zhao MY, Mezue M, Segerdahl AR et al (2017) A systematic study of the sensitivity of partial volume correction methods for the quantification of perfusion from pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling MRI. Neuroimage 162:384–397CrossRef

13.

Mutsaerts H, Petr J, Lysvik E et al (2017) ExploreASL: image processing toolbox for multi-center arterial spin labeling population analyses. Presentation number 733 at Software Exhibit Area, Abstract ID = 1180, European Society For Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology, Barcelona

14.

Heijtel DF, Petersen ET, Mutsaerts HJ et al (2016) Quantitative agreement between [¹⁵O]H₂O PET and model free QUASAR MRI-derived cerebral blood flow and arterial blood volume. NMR Biomed 29:519–526

15.

Mak HK, Chan Q, Zhang Z et al (2012) Quantitative assessment of cerebral hemodynamic parameters by QUASAR arterial spin labeling in Alzheimer’s disease and cognitively normal Elderly adults at 3-tesla. J Alzheimers Dis 31:33–44CrossRef

16.

Petersen ET, Lim T, Golay X (2006) Model-free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 55:219–232CrossRef

17.

Donahue MJ, Achten E, Cogswell PM et al (2018) Consensus statement on current and emerging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 38:1391–1417CrossRef

18.

Paling D, Thade Petersen E, Tozer DJ et al (2014) Cerebral arterial bolus arrival time is prolonged in multiple sclerosis and associated with disability. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34:34–42

19.

Godi C, Sokolska M, Kennedy F, Fallatah S, Golay X, Jager HR (2015) Non-invasive quantification of brain perfusion and cerebral haemodynamics with quasar arterial spin labeling (ASL) in patients with carotid atherosclerotic stenosis. Eur Soc Magn Reson Med Biol, Edinburgh, p 469

20.

Chng SM, Petersen ET, Zimine I, Sitoh YY, Lim CC, Golay X (2008) Territorial arterial spin labeling in the assessment of collateral circulation: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 39:3248–3254.

21.

Hendrikse J, Petersen ET, Chng SM, Venketasubramanian N, Golay X (2010) Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the nucleus caudatus, nucleus lentiformis, and thalamus: a study of territorial arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. Radiology 254:867–875CrossRef

22.

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ : 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675

23.

Hendrikse J, Petersen ET van Laar PJ, Golay X (2008) Cerebral border zone between distal end branches of intracranial arteries: MR imaging. Radiology 246:572–580

24.

Deibler AR, Pollock JM, Kraft RA, Tan H, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA (2008) Arterial spin-labeling in routine clinical practice, part 1: technique and artifacts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:1228–1234CrossRef

25.

Grade M, Hernandez Tamames JA, Pizzini FB, Achten E, Golay X, Smits M (2015) A neuroradiologist’s guide to arterial spin labeling MRI in clinical practice. Neuroradiology 57:1181–1202

26.

Rothwell PM (2000) Analysis of agreement between measurements of continuous variables: General principles and lessons from studies of imaging of carotid stenosis. J Neurol 247:825–834CrossRef

27.

Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability Research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163CrossRef

28.

Petr J, Mutsaerts H, de Vita E, et al (2016) Influence of realignment-induced interpolation errors on the estimation of cerebral blood flow using arterial spin labeling fMRI. Magn Reson Mater Phy 29(Suppl 1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0568-x

29.

Jezzard P, Clare S (1999) Sources of distortion in functional MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 8:80–85

30.

Amukotuwa SA, Marks MP, Zaharchuk G, Calamante F, Bammer R, Fischbein N (2018) Arterial spin-labeling improves detection of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:669–677

31.

Mutsaerts HJ, Petr J, Václavů L et al (2017) The spatial coefficient of variation in arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow images. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37:3184–3192

32.

Dolui S, Wang Z, Shinohara RT, Wolk DA, Detre JA (2016) Structural correlation-based outlier rejection (SCORE) algorithm for arterial spin labeling Time Series. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:1786–1797CrossRef

33.

Shirzadi Z, Crane DE, Robertson AD et al (2015) Automated removal of spurious intermediate cerebral blood flow volumes improves image quality among older patients: a clinical arterial spin labeling investigation. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:1377–1385CrossRef

34.

Mortamet B, Bernstein M, Jack CR Jr et al (2009) Automatic quality assessment in structural brain magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 62:365–372

35.

Hales PW, Kawadler JM, Aylett SE, Kirkham FJ, Clark CA (2014) Arterial spin labeling characterization of cerebral perfusion during normal maturation from late childhood into adulthood: normal ‘reference range’ values and their use in clinical studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34:776–784CrossRef

36.

Vidorreta M, Wang Z, Rodríguez I Pastor MA, Detre JA, Fernández-Seara MA (2013) Comparison of 2D and 3D single-shot ASL perfusion fMRI sequences. Neuroimage 66:662–671

37.

Mutsaerts HJMM, Petr J, Thomas DL et al (2018) Comparison of arterial spin labeling registration strategies in the multi-center GENetic frontotemporal dementia initiative (GENFI). J Magn Reson Imaging 47:131–140

Title: A visual quality control scale for clinical arterial spin labeling images
Authors: S. M. Fallatah
F. B. Pizzini
B. Gomez-Anson
J. Magerkurth
E. De Vita
S. Bisdas
H. R. Jäger
H. J. M. M. Mutsaerts
X. Golay
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: European Radiology Experimental / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2509-9280
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0073-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

A visual quality control scale for clinical arterial spin labeling images

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

The potential toxic impact of different gadolinium-based contrast agents combined with 7-T MRI on isolated human lymphocytes

DNA breaks induced by iodine-containing contrast medium in radiodiagnostics: a problem of tungsten?

Changes in total choline concentration in the breast of healthy fertile young women in relation to menstrual cycle or use of oral contraceptives: a 3-T 1H-MRS study

Splenectomy for hypersplenism with or without preoperative splenic artery embolisation

Using body mass index to estimate individualised patient radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography

Through the HoloLens™ looking glass: augmented reality for extremity reconstruction surgery using 3D vascular models with perforating vessels