Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology Experimental 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Hypothesis

DNA breaks induced by iodine-containing contrast medium in radiodiagnostics: a problem of tungsten?

Authors: Mélanie L. Ferlazzo, Clement Devic, Adeline Granzotto, Anne-Marie Charvet, Franck Pilleul, Catherine Colin, Marie-Claude Biston, Aurélie Joubert, Michel Bourguignon, Nicolas Foray

Published in: European Radiology Experimental | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Iodine-containing contrast media (ICM) are extensively used to improve image quality and information content in x-ray-based examinations, particularly in computed tomography (CT). In parallel, there is increasing evidence that the use of ICM during CT sessions is associated with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) breaks that may influence the estimation of the risks linked to x-ray exposure. Why has iodine been preferred to any other heavy elements to enhance contrast in radiodiagnostics? How to understand such DNA breaks effect? We searched for the answers in the early times of x-ray medical use. It appeared that the maximal ratio between the relative iodine and water mass energy absorption coefficients is reached in the range of 40–60 keV, which defines the energy range in which the dose is preferentially absorbed by ICM. This range does not correspond to the K-edge of iodine but to that of tungsten, the major component of the x-ray tube anode of CT scanners. At such energy, radiolysis of the ICM produces sodium or potassium iodide that prevents a normal DNA breaks repair and influences the individual response to x-ray low-dose. Both contrast enhancement and DNA breaks effect may therefore be caused by tungsten of the anodes of x-ray tubes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
According to a recent semantic study [2], we preferred the term ‘iodine-containing’ to ‘iodinated contrast agent’, which has the advantage to keep the commonly accepted ‘ICM’ abbreviation.
 
2
Until this date, the x-ray tube anode was made by cold metal and not by tungsten that reaches about 3000 °C when x-rays are emitted.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bae KT (2010) Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 256:32–61CrossRefPubMed Bae KT (2010) Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 256:32–61CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nyman U, Aspelin P, Almen T (2015) Iodinated contrast media: a semantic somersault. Radiology 275:934CrossRefPubMed Nyman U, Aspelin P, Almen T (2015) Iodinated contrast media: a semantic somersault. Radiology 275:934CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Haschek E, Lindenthal O (1896) Contribution to the practical use of photography according to Röntgen. Wien Klin Wochenschr 9:63 Haschek E, Lindenthal O (1896) Contribution to the practical use of photography according to Röntgen. Wien Klin Wochenschr 9:63
4.
go back to reference Destot E, Bérard L (1896) Société des sciences médicales de Lyon - Séance du 11 novembre 1896. Lyon Médical 88:392 Destot E, Bérard L (1896) Société des sciences médicales de Lyon - Séance du 11 novembre 1896. Lyon Médical 88:392
5.
go back to reference Mould RF (1993) A century of X-rays and radioactivity in medicine. Institute of Physics Publishing, CRC Press, London Mould RF (1993) A century of X-rays and radioactivity in medicine. Institute of Physics Publishing, CRC Press, London
6.
go back to reference Oriel JD (1994) The scars of Venus: a history of venereology. Springer Verlag, LondonCrossRef Oriel JD (1994) The scars of Venus: a history of venereology. Springer Verlag, LondonCrossRef
7.
9.
go back to reference Singh J, Daftary A (2008) Iodinated contrast media and their adverse reactions. J Nucl Med Technol 36:69–74 quiz 76-77CrossRefPubMed Singh J, Daftary A (2008) Iodinated contrast media and their adverse reactions. J Nucl Med Technol 36:69–74 quiz 76-77CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Joubert A, Biston MC, Boudou C et al (2005) Irradiation in presence of iodinated contrast agent results in radiosensitization of endothelial cells: consequences for computed tomography therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:1486–1496CrossRefPubMed Joubert A, Biston MC, Boudou C et al (2005) Irradiation in presence of iodinated contrast agent results in radiosensitization of endothelial cells: consequences for computed tomography therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:1486–1496CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Norman A, Cochran ST, Sayre JW (2001) Meta-analysis of increases in micronuclei in peripheral blood lymphocytes after angiography or excretory urography. Radiat Res 155:740–743CrossRefPubMed Norman A, Cochran ST, Sayre JW (2001) Meta-analysis of increases in micronuclei in peripheral blood lymphocytes after angiography or excretory urography. Radiat Res 155:740–743CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lobrich M, Rief N, Kuhne M et al (2005) In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:8984–8989CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lobrich M, Rief N, Kuhne M et al (2005) In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:8984–8989CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Rothkamm K, Balroop S, Shekhdar J, Fernie P, Goh V (2007) Leukocyte DNA damage after multi-detector row CT: a quantitative biomarker of low-level radiation exposure. Radiology 242:244–251CrossRefPubMed Rothkamm K, Balroop S, Shekhdar J, Fernie P, Goh V (2007) Leukocyte DNA damage after multi-detector row CT: a quantitative biomarker of low-level radiation exposure. Radiology 242:244–251CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Geisel D, Heverhagen JT, Kalinowski M, Wagner HJ (2008) DNA double-strand breaks after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Radiology 248:852–859CrossRefPubMed Geisel D, Heverhagen JT, Kalinowski M, Wagner HJ (2008) DNA double-strand breaks after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Radiology 248:852–859CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Joubert A, Zimmerman KM, Bencokova Z et al (2008) DNA double-strand break repair defects in syndromes associated with acute radiation response: at least two different assays to predict intrinsic radiosensitivity? Int J Radiat Biol 84:1–19CrossRef Joubert A, Zimmerman KM, Bencokova Z et al (2008) DNA double-strand break repair defects in syndromes associated with acute radiation response: at least two different assays to predict intrinsic radiosensitivity? Int J Radiat Biol 84:1–19CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Segal AJ, Bush WH Jr (2011) Avoidable errors in dealing with anaphylactoid reactions to iodinated contrast media. Invest Radiol 46:147–151CrossRefPubMed Segal AJ, Bush WH Jr (2011) Avoidable errors in dealing with anaphylactoid reactions to iodinated contrast media. Invest Radiol 46:147–151CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Xue L, Yu D, Furusawa Y, Cao J, Okayasu R, Fan S (2009) ATM-dependent hyper-radiosensitivity in mammalian cells irradiated by heavy ions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:235–243CrossRefPubMed Xue L, Yu D, Furusawa Y, Cao J, Okayasu R, Fan S (2009) ATM-dependent hyper-radiosensitivity in mammalian cells irradiated by heavy ions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:235–243CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Joiner MC, Marples B, Lambin P, Short SC, Turesson I (2001) Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:379–389CrossRefPubMed Joiner MC, Marples B, Lambin P, Short SC, Turesson I (2001) Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:379–389CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
DNA breaks induced by iodine-containing contrast medium in radiodiagnostics: a problem of tungsten?
Authors
Mélanie L. Ferlazzo
Clement Devic
Adeline Granzotto
Anne-Marie Charvet
Franck Pilleul
Catherine Colin
Marie-Claude Biston
Aurélie Joubert
Michel Bourguignon
Nicolas Foray
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
European Radiology Experimental / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2509-9280
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0050-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

European Radiology Experimental 1/2018 Go to the issue