Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research

Authors: Kate Churruca, Kristiana Ludlow, Wendy Wu, Kate Gibbons, Hoa Mi Nguyen, Louise A. Ellis, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Q-methodology is an approach to studying complex issues of human ‘subjectivity’. Although this approach was developed in the early twentieth century, the value of Q-methodology in healthcare was not recognised until relatively recently. The aim of this review was to scope the empirical healthcare literature to examine the extent to which Q-methodology has been utilised in healthcare over time, including how it has been used and for what purposes.

Methods

A search of three electronic databases (Scopus, EBSCO-CINAHL Complete, Medline) was conducted. No date restriction was applied. A title and abstract review, followed by a full-text review, was conducted by a team of five reviewers. Included articles were English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles that used Q-methodology (both Q-sorting and inverted factor analysis) in healthcare settings. The following data items were extracted into a purpose-designed Excel spreadsheet: study details (e.g., setting, country, year), reasons for using Q-methodology, healthcare topic area, participants (type and number), materials (e.g., ranking anchors and Q-set), methods (e.g., development of the Q-set, analysis), study results, and study implications. Data synthesis was descriptive in nature and involved frequency counting, open coding and the organisation by data items.

Results

Of the 2,302 articles identified by the search, 289 studies were included in this review. We found evidence of increased use of Q-methodology in healthcare, particularly over the last 5 years. However, this research remains diffuse, spread across a large number of journals and topic areas. In a number of studies, we identified limitations in the reporting of methods, such as insufficient information on how authors derived their Q-set, what types of analyses they performed, and the amount of variance explained.

Conclusions

Although Q-methodology is increasingly being adopted in healthcare research, it still appears to be relatively novel. This review highlight commonalities in how the method has been used, areas of application, and the potential value of the approach. To facilitate reporting of Q-methodological studies, we present a checklist of details that should be included for publication.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Super factors are the resulting factors from a second order factor analysis, in which the first order factor arrays (ideal Q-sorts computed for each factor) are considered Q sorts.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braithwaite J, Churruca K, Ellis LA, Long J, Clay-Williams R, Damen N, et al. Complexity Science in Healthcare – Aspirations, Approaches, Applications and Accomplishments: A White Paper. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University; 2017. ISBN: 978-1-74138-456-7. Braithwaite J, Churruca K, Ellis LA, Long J, Clay-Williams R, Damen N, et al. Complexity Science in Healthcare – Aspirations, Approaches, Applications and Accomplishments: A White Paper. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University; 2017. ISBN: 978-1-74138-456-7.
3.
go back to reference McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, Lewis R, Lin N, Kraft SA, et al. Closing the quality gap: A critical analysis of quality improvement strategies (Vol. 7: Care Coordination; Technical Review No. 9). Rockville: US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, Lewis R, Lin N, Kraft SA, et al. Closing the quality gap: A critical analysis of quality improvement strategies (Vol. 7: Care Coordination; Technical Review No. 9). Rockville: US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.
10.
go back to reference Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
12.
go back to reference Marks DF, Yardley L. Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. London: SAGE Ltd; 2004. Marks DF, Yardley L. Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. London: SAGE Ltd; 2004.
13.
go back to reference Brown SR. The history and principles of Q methodology in psychology and the social sciences. In: British Psychological Society symposium on “A Quest for a Science of Subjectivity: The Lifework of William Stephenson”. London: University of London; 1997. Brown SR. The history and principles of Q methodology in psychology and the social sciences. In: British Psychological Society symposium on “A Quest for a Science of Subjectivity: The Lifework of William Stephenson”. London: University of London; 1997.
14.
go back to reference Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method & Interpretation. London: SAGE Publications; 2012. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method & Interpretation. London: SAGE Publications; 2012.
15.
go back to reference Stainton RR. Q methodology. In: Smith JA, Harré R, Langenhove LV, editors. Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 1995. p. 178–92. Stainton RR. Q methodology. In: Smith JA, Harré R, Langenhove LV, editors. Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 1995. p. 178–92.
16.
go back to reference McKeown B, Thomas DB. Q Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2013. McKeown B, Thomas DB. Q Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2013.
19.
go back to reference Comrey A, Lee H. Interpretation and application of factor analytic results. In: Comrey A, Lee H, editors. A First Course in Factor Analysis, vol. 2. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 1992. p. 240–62. Comrey A, Lee H. Interpretation and application of factor analytic results. In: Comrey A, Lee H, editors. A First Course in Factor Analysis, vol. 2. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 1992. p. 240–62.
25.
go back to reference Stephenson W. The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and its Methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1953. Stephenson W. The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and its Methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1953.
26.
go back to reference Brown SR. Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1980. Brown SR. Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1980.
35.
36.
go back to reference McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276–82. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276–82.
46.
go back to reference Jung SK, Chon MY. Subjectivity toward transition experience of the patient who moves from intensive care unit to a general ward. Int J Appl Eng Res. 2014;9(24):29637–42. Jung SK, Chon MY. Subjectivity toward transition experience of the patient who moves from intensive care unit to a general ward. Int J Appl Eng Res. 2014;9(24):29637–42.
65.
86.
go back to reference Eaton E. What is a good birth? Using Q method to explore the diversity of attitudes about good birth. J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health. 2014;28(3):147–73. Eaton E. What is a good birth? Using Q method to explore the diversity of attitudes about good birth. J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health. 2014;28(3):147–73.
93.
94.
101.
go back to reference Protière C, Spire B, Mora M, Poizot-Martin I, Préau M, Doumergue M, et al. Patterns of patient and healthcare provider viewpoints regarding participation in HIV cure-related clinical trials. Findings from a multicentre French survey using Q methodology (ANRS-APSEC). PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0187489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187489 Protière C, Spire B, Mora M, Poizot-Martin I, Préau M, Doumergue M, et al. Patterns of patient and healthcare provider viewpoints regarding participation in HIV cure-related clinical trials. Findings from a multicentre French survey using Q methodology (ANRS-APSEC). PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0187489. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0187489
107.
go back to reference Hasan H, Moleche J, Banna S. Australian online public information systems: A user-centred study of an evolving public health website. Australas J Inf Syst. 2012;17(2):5–19. Hasan H, Moleche J, Banna S. Australian online public information systems: A user-centred study of an evolving public health website. Australas J Inf Syst. 2012;17(2):5–19.
117.
go back to reference Adderley H, Wittkowski A, Calam R, Gregg L. Adult mental health practitioner beliefs about psychosis, parenting, and the role of the practitioner: A Q methodological investigation. Psychol Psychother. 2020;93(4):657–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12249. Adderley H, Wittkowski A, Calam R, Gregg L. Adult mental health practitioner beliefs about psychosis, parenting, and the role of the practitioner: A Q methodological investigation. Psychol Psychother. 2020;93(4):657–73. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​papt.​12249.
132.
go back to reference Vendetti-Hastie S, Dowdall-Smith S, Montgomery P. Northern healthcare students’ perceptions of hand hygiene in community practice. Can J Infect Control. 2015;30(4):218–24. Vendetti-Hastie S, Dowdall-Smith S, Montgomery P. Northern healthcare students’ perceptions of hand hygiene in community practice. Can J Infect Control. 2015;30(4):218–24.
Metadata
Title
A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research
Authors
Kate Churruca
Kristiana Ludlow
Wendy Wu
Kate Gibbons
Hoa Mi Nguyen
Louise A. Ellis
Jeffrey Braithwaite
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01309-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2021 Go to the issue