Skip to main content
Top
Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 4/2006

01-07-2006 | Original Research Article

A Comparison of Two Multiple-Characteristic Decision-Making Models for the Comparison of Antihypertensive Drug Classes

Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)

Authors: Dr Boris L. G. Van Wijk, Olaf H. Klungel, Eibert R. Heerdink, Anthonius de Boer

Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Multiple-characteristics decision-making (MCDM) models can be used to calculate a score, based on a set of characteristics, for a number of alternative drugs or drug classes to allow comparison between them and thus enhance evidence-based pharmacotherapy.

Objective

To compare two MCDM models, Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), in determining first-line antihypertensive drug class.

Methods

Five different classes of antihypertensive drugs were analyzed: diuretics, β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers), dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCBs), ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]). Four characteristics were deemed relevant for the determination of first-line antihypertensive drug class: effectiveness, persistence with treatment as a measure of tolerability, cost, and clinical experience. Weight factors were determined by sending questionnaires to cardiologists, pharmacists, general practitioners (GPs), and internists in The Netherlands. Absolute scores for the characteristics were determined from literature (effectiveness and persistence) and health insurance data (costs and clinical experience).

Results

Ninety-two cardiologists (33% of those sent the questionnaire), 90 GPs (31%), 87 internists (31%), and 123 pharmacists (43%) completed the questionnaire. Among all professions, according to both SAW and TOPSIS, ACE inhibitors were ranked as the first-line antihypertensive drug class, typically followed by β-blockers.

Conclusion

Both SAW and TOPIS analyses, using weight factors assigned by cardiologists, pharmacists, GPs, and internists from The Netherlands, rank ACE inhibitors as the first choice among antihypertensive drug classes for the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension. Both methods are valuable tools in the development of evidence-based pharmacotherapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferrari MD. Tripstar: a comprehensive patient-based approach to compare triptans. Headache 2002; 42 Suppl. 1: 18–25.PubMedCrossRef Ferrari MD. Tripstar: a comprehensive patient-based approach to compare triptans. Headache 2002; 42 Suppl. 1: 18–25.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Ferrari MD, et al. TRIPSTAR: prioritizing oral triptan treatment attributes in migraine management. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110(3): 137–43.PubMedCrossRef Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Ferrari MD, et al. TRIPSTAR: prioritizing oral triptan treatment attributes in migraine management. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110(3): 137–43.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Janknegt R. Fluoroquinolones: use of clinical data to aid formulary choice by the system of objective judgement analysis (SOJA) method. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 6(1): 15–33.PubMedCrossRef Janknegt R. Fluoroquinolones: use of clinical data to aid formulary choice by the system of objective judgement analysis (SOJA) method. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 6(1): 15–33.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Janknegt R. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: formulary committee perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19 Suppl. 2: 49–52.PubMedCrossRef Janknegt R. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: formulary committee perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19 Suppl. 2: 49–52.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Janknegt R, Steenhoek A. The system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA): a tool in rational drug selection for formulary inclusion. Drugs 1997; 53(4): 550–62.PubMedCrossRef Janknegt R, Steenhoek A. The system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA): a tool in rational drug selection for formulary inclusion. Drugs 1997; 53(4): 550–62.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Janknegt R, van den Broek PJ, Kullberg BJ, et al. Choice of antibiotics in uncomplicated cystitis; application of ‘system of objectified judgement analysis’ (SOJA) method [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143(49): 2466–71.PubMed Janknegt R, van den Broek PJ, Kullberg BJ, et al. Choice of antibiotics in uncomplicated cystitis; application of ‘system of objectified judgement analysis’ (SOJA) method [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143(49): 2466–71.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Janknegt R, van der Kuy A, Declerck G, et al. Hypnotics: drug selection by means of the system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA) method. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10(2): 152–63.PubMedCrossRef Janknegt R, van der Kuy A, Declerck G, et al. Hypnotics: drug selection by means of the system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA) method. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10(2): 152–63.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brodie MJ, Kwan P. The star systems: overview and use in determining antiepileptic drug choice. CNS Drugs 2001; 15(1): 1–12.PubMedCrossRef Brodie MJ, Kwan P. The star systems: overview and use in determining antiepileptic drug choice. CNS Drugs 2001; 15(1): 1–12.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD, et al. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. JAMA 2003; 289(19): 2534–44.PubMedCrossRef Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD, et al. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. JAMA 2003; 289(19): 2534–44.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gregoire JP, Moisan J, Guibert R, et al. Determinants of discontinuation of new courses of antihypertensive medications. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55(7): 728–35.PubMedCrossRef Gregoire JP, Moisan J, Guibert R, et al. Determinants of discontinuation of new courses of antihypertensive medications. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55(7): 728–35.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bloom BS. Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy. Clin Ther 1998; 20(4): 671–81.PubMedCrossRef Bloom BS. Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy. Clin Ther 1998; 20(4): 671–81.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.CrossRef Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Whitworth JA. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21(11): 1983–92.PubMedCrossRef Whitworth JA. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21(11): 1983–92.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wiersma T, Walma EP, Thomas S, et al. Summary of the practice guideline ‘Hypertension’ (third division) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004 May 8; 148(19): 923–31.PubMed Wiersma T, Walma EP, Thomas S, et al. Summary of the practice guideline ‘Hypertension’ (third division) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004 May 8; 148(19): 923–31.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. on behalf of Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003 Dec; 42(6): 1206–52. Epub 2003 Dec 1.PubMedCrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. on behalf of Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003 Dec; 42(6): 1206–52. Epub 2003 Dec 1.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, et al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 1997; 277(9): 739–45.PubMedCrossRef Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, et al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 1997; 277(9): 739–45.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD. Meta-analysis of health outcomes of chlorthalidone-based vs nonchlorthalidone-based low-dose diuretic therapies. JAMA 2004; 292(1): 43–4.PubMedCrossRef Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD. Meta-analysis of health outcomes of chlorthalidone-based vs nonchlorthalidone-based low-dose diuretic therapies. JAMA 2004; 292(1): 43–4.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Robbiano L, Martelli A, Brambilla G. Discrepancies between use of antihypertensive drugs and guidelines indications: pharmacoeconomic implications. J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19(10): 819–22.PubMedCrossRef Robbiano L, Martelli A, Brambilla G. Discrepancies between use of antihypertensive drugs and guidelines indications: pharmacoeconomic implications. J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19(10): 819–22.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Steinman MA, Fischer MA, Shlipak MG, et al. Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines. Am J Med 2004; 117(10): 747–54.PubMedCrossRef Steinman MA, Fischer MA, Shlipak MG, et al. Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines. Am J Med 2004; 117(10): 747–54.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Univesity Press, 1995: 28–53. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Univesity Press, 1995: 28–53.
24.
go back to reference Hasford J, Mimran A, Simons WR. A population-based European cohort study of persistence in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16(8): 569–75.PubMedCrossRef Hasford J, Mimran A, Simons WR. A population-based European cohort study of persistence in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16(8): 569–75.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 2004; 364(9446): 1684–9.PubMedCrossRef Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 2004; 364(9446): 1684–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet 2005; 366(9496): 1545–53.PubMedCrossRef Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet 2005; 366(9496): 1545–53.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9426): 2022–31.PubMedCrossRef Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9426): 2022–31.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359(9311): 995–1003.PubMedCrossRef Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359(9311): 995–1003.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Metadata
Title
A Comparison of Two Multiple-Characteristic Decision-Making Models for the Comparison of Antihypertensive Drug Classes
Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
Authors
Dr Boris L. G. Van Wijk
Olaf H. Klungel
Eibert R. Heerdink
Anthonius de Boer
Publication date
01-07-2006
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 1175-3277
Electronic ISSN: 1179-187X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00129784-200606040-00005

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 4/2006 Go to the issue

Adis Drug Evaluation

Reteplase