Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 3/2018

01-07-2018 | Original Article

Wire bias in coronary measurement using optical coherence tomography

Authors: Edward James Danson, Peter Hansen, Ravinay Bhindi

Published in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

OCT is widely used for accurate coronary stent sizing; however, the impact of coronary tortuosity or guide wire weight on the accuracy of OCT in assessing coronary dimensions is not known. This study sought to determine whether guide wire properties impact on coronary diameter and length estimation by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in tortuous segments of coronary artery. OCT coronary diameters were determined in selected patients with tortuous arteries before and after removal of a supportive guide wire to obtain unobscured images. In addition, a coronary model was created with lumen diameters of 1.7–4.8 mm. This was used to perform OCT images with a flexible (FW) and a stiff guide wire (SW) when straight or on a 25 mm radius curve to simulate tortuosity. Lumen diameter decreased by a mean of 3.2 + 1.0% after support wire removal in patients undergoing OCT for coronary sizing. In a coronary model, lumen length was constant when straight but underestimated between 0 and 4.5% (FW) and 0 and 12% (SW) when tortuous (P < 0.001, FW vs. SW, unpaired t test). Mean lumen diameter was overestimated by tortuosity (FW vs. SW for tube sizes 1.7 mm: +0–0.1 mm vs. +0.1–0.2 mm, P = 0.31; 2.7 mm: +0.02–0.17 mm vs. +0.18–0.46 mm, P < 0.01; 3.2 mm: +0.35–0.39 mm vs. +0.77–0.91 mm, P < 0.001; 4.8 mm: +0.4–0.69 mm vs. +0.88–1.05 mm, P < 0.001; unpaired t tests). Overestimation of diameter could be minimised by measuring luminal images with the least eccentric catheter position. OCT underestimation of length and overestimation of diameter should be considered when performing coronary intervention in tortuous vessels. The effect is augmented by increased wire stiffness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wakabayashi K, Lindsay J, Laynez-Carnicero A, et al. Utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for type C lesions. J Interv Cardiol. 2012;25(5):452–9.CrossRefPubMed Wakabayashi K, Lindsay J, Laynez-Carnicero A, et al. Utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for type C lesions. J Interv Cardiol. 2012;25(5):452–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Parise H, Maehara A, Stone GW, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiographic guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention in pre-drug-eluting stent era. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(3):374–82.CrossRefPubMed Parise H, Maehara A, Stone GW, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiographic guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention in pre-drug-eluting stent era. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(3):374–82.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(3):167–77.CrossRefPubMed Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(3):167–77.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Roy P, Steinberg DH, Sushinsky SJ, et al. The potential clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(15):1851–7.CrossRefPubMed Roy P, Steinberg DH, Sushinsky SJ, et al. The potential clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(15):1851–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2618–28.CrossRefPubMed Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2618–28.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kim IC, Nam CW, Cho YK, Park HS, Yoon HJ, Kim H, Chung IS, Han S, Hur SH, Kim YN, Kim KB. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:860–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.080.CrossRefPubMed Kim IC, Nam CW, Cho YK, Park HS, Yoon HJ, Kim H, Chung IS, Han S, Hur SH, Kim YN, Kim KB. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:860–6. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijcard.​2016.​07.​080.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Park DW, Choi BR, Park KH, Kim YH, Cheong SS, Song JK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(11):1305–10.CrossRefPubMed Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Park DW, Choi BR, Park KH, Kim YH, Cheong SS, Song JK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(11):1305–10.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sanidas E, Dangas G. Evolution of intravascular assessment of coronary anatomy and physiology: from ultrasound imaging to optical and flow assessment. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43(9):996–1008.CrossRefPubMed Sanidas E, Dangas G. Evolution of intravascular assessment of coronary anatomy and physiology: from ultrasound imaging to optical and flow assessment. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43(9):996–1008.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference van Soest G, Regar E, Goderie TP, Gonzalo N, Koljenović S, van Leenders GJ, Serruys PW, van der Steen AF. Pitfalls in plaque characterization by OCT: image artifacts in native coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(7):810–3.CrossRefPubMed van Soest G, Regar E, Goderie TP, Gonzalo N, Koljenović S, van Leenders GJ, Serruys PW, van der Steen AF. Pitfalls in plaque characterization by OCT: image artifacts in native coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(7):810–3.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bekeredjian R, Hardt S, Just A, et al. Influence of catheter position and equipment-related factors on the accuracy of intravascular ultrasound measurements. J Invasive Cardiol. 1999;11(4):207–12.PubMed Bekeredjian R, Hardt S, Just A, et al. Influence of catheter position and equipment-related factors on the accuracy of intravascular ultrasound measurements. J Invasive Cardiol. 1999;11(4):207–12.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bezerra HG, Costa MA, Guagliumi G, et al. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: a comprehensive review clinical and research applications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(11):1035–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bezerra HG, Costa MA, Guagliumi G, et al. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: a comprehensive review clinical and research applications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(11):1035–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Suzuki N, Guagliumi G, Bezerra HG, et al. The impact of an eccentric intravascular imagewire during coronary optical coherence tomography imaging. EuroIntervention. 2011;6(8):963–9.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki N, Guagliumi G, Bezerra HG, et al. The impact of an eccentric intravascular imagewire during coronary optical coherence tomography imaging. EuroIntervention. 2011;6(8):963–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gökdeniz T, Kalaycıoğlu E, Çağrı A, et al. Value of coronary artery calcium score to predict severity or complexity of coronary artery disease. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;102(2):120–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Gökdeniz T, Kalaycıoğlu E, Çağrı A, et al. Value of coronary artery calcium score to predict severity or complexity of coronary artery disease. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;102(2):120–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Eleid MF, Guddeti RR, Tweet MS, et al. Coronary artery tortuosity in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: angiographic characteristics and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(5):656–62.CrossRefPubMed Eleid MF, Guddeti RR, Tweet MS, et al. Coronary artery tortuosity in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: angiographic characteristics and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(5):656–62.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tu S, Xu L, Ligthart J, et al. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28(6):1315–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tu S, Xu L, Ligthart J, et al. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28(6):1315–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J, et al. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(5):620–6.CrossRefPubMed Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J, et al. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(5):620–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kawase Y, Suzuki Y, Ikeno F, et al. Comparison of nonuniform rotational distortion between mechanical IVUS and OCT using a phantom model. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(1):67–73.CrossRefPubMed Kawase Y, Suzuki Y, Ikeno F, et al. Comparison of nonuniform rotational distortion between mechanical IVUS and OCT using a phantom model. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(1):67–73.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American college of cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the american college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1478–92.CrossRefPubMed Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American college of cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the american college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1478–92.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Di Mario C, Madretsma S, Linker D, et al. The angle of incidence of the ultrasonic beam: a critical factor for the image quality in intravascular ultrasonography. Am Heart J. 1993;125(2 Pt 1):442–8.CrossRefPubMed Di Mario C, Madretsma S, Linker D, et al. The angle of incidence of the ultrasonic beam: a critical factor for the image quality in intravascular ultrasonography. Am Heart J. 1993;125(2 Pt 1):442–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Wire bias in coronary measurement using optical coherence tomography
Authors
Edward James Danson
Peter Hansen
Ravinay Bhindi
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1868-4300
Electronic ISSN: 1868-4297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-017-0468-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 3/2018 Go to the issue