Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Intensive Care Medicine
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 3/2005

01-03-2005 | Clinical Commentary

Will ethical requirements bring critical care research to a halt?

Author: Robert D. Truog

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Excerpt

If current trends continue, within several years it could become nearly impossible to conduct research in critical care medicine. These trends have evolved in parallel in both North America and Europe. In North America, the catalyst for controversy has been the ARDSNet trials [1, 2]. In Europe, the focus has been on European Directive 2001/20/EC [3]. Although these developments differ in their details, they essentially reflect the public’s mistrust of clinicians and investigators involved in clinical research. This is a sad paradox, because critical care medicine consumes a large proportion of societal resources—more than 1% of the gross domestic product in the United States [4]—such that development of improved and more cost-effective interventions is in everyone’s best interests. …
Literature
1.
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308CrossRefPubMed
2.
Steinbrook R (2003) How best to ventilate? Trial design and patient safety in studies of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:1393–1401CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Levit K, Smith C, Cowan C, Lazenby H, Sensenig A, Catlin A (2003) Trends in U.S. health care spending, 2001. Health Affairs 22:154–164CrossRef
5.
Druml C, Singer EA (2004) The European Directive: a further blow to science in intensive care medicine in Austria. Intensive Care Med 30:335CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Dreyfuss D (2004)To consent or not to consent, that is (not) the (sole) question.”And there is nothing new under the sun”. Kohelet (also known as Ecclesiastes), 1:9. Bible. Intensive Care Med 30:180–182CrossRefPubMed
8.
Fried C (1974) The practice of experimentation. Medical experimentation: personal integrity and social policy. Elsevier, New York, pp 143–160
9.
Toomasian JM, Snedecor SM, Cornell RG, Cilley RE, Bartlett RH (1988) National experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for newborn respiratory failure. Data from 715 cases. ASAIO Trans 34:140–147PubMed
10.
Bartlett RH, Roloff DW, Cornell RG, Andrews AF, Dillon PW (1985) Extracorporeal circulation in neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective randomized study. Pediatrics 76:479–487PubMed
11.
O’Rourke PP, Crone RK, Vacanti JP, Ware JH, Lillehei CW (1989) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and conventional medical therapy in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a prospective randomized study. Pediatrics 84:957–963PubMed
12.
Field D, Davis C, Elbourne D, Grant A, Johnson A, Macrae D (1996) UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Lancet 348:75–82CrossRefPubMed
13.
Lantos JD (1997) Was the UK collaborative ECMO trial ethical? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 11:264–268PubMed
14.
Slutsky AS (2002) Prone positioning of patients with acute respiratory failure [letter]. N Engl J Med 346:297CrossRef
15.
Berwick DM (1996) Harvesting knowledge from improvement. J Am Med Assoc 275:877–878CrossRef
16.
Hellman S, Hellman DS (1991) Of mice but not men. problems of the randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 324:1585–1589PubMed
17.
Morris AH (1993) Protocol management of adult respiratory distress syndrome. New Horiz 1:593–602PubMed
18.
Peppercorn JM, Weeks JC, Cook EF, Joffe S (2004) Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: conceptual framework and structured review. Lancet 363:263–270CrossRefPubMed
19.
Katz J (1993) “Ethics and clinical research” revisited: a tribute to Henry K. Beecher. Hastings Cent Rep 23:31–39PubMed
20.
Freedman B (1987) Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 317:141–145PubMed
21.
Miller FG, Brody H (2002) What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical? Am J Bioeth 2:3–9CrossRef
22.
Miller FG, Brody H (2003) A critique of clinical equipoise: therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Cent Rep 33:19–28
23.
Smithells R (1975) Iatrogenic hazards and their effects. Postgrad Med J 51:39–52PubMed
24.
Casarett D, Karlawish JH, Sugarman J (2000) Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: proposed criteria and potential implications. J Am Med Assoc 283:2275–2280CrossRef
25.
Truog RD, Robinson W, Randolph A, Morris A (1999) Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? N Engl J Med 340:804–807CrossRefPubMed
26.
Department of Health and Human Services/Food and Drug Administration/Office of the Secretary. Protection of human subjects (1996) Informed consent and waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research. Federal Register 61:51497–51533
27.
Weijer C (2000)The ethical analysis of risk. J Law Med Ethics 28:344–361PubMed
Metadata
Title
Will ethical requirements bring critical care research to a halt?
Author
Robert D. Truog
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2480-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

Intensive Care Medicine 3/2005 Go to the issue

Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care

Comparison of indirect methods of measuring intra-abdominal pressure in children

News

The European Union Directive on Clinical Research: present status of implementation in EU member states’ legislations with regard to the incompetent patient

Experimental

Breath-to-breath analysis of abdominal and rib cage motion in surfactant-depleted piglets during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation

Correspondence

Hanging causing severe reversible left ventricular dysfunction

Original

SAPS II revisited

Original

Withdrawal following sufentanil/propofol and sufentanil/midazolam