Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Otology

Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques

Authors: Martin Reznitsky, Kirsten Wielandt, Søren Foghsgaard

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To present long-term data on the Wide Ponto implant bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS) in regards to implant stability, soft tissue reaction and implant loss for two case series undergone either the tissue reduction- or the tissue preservation surgical technique.

Methods

Comparison of two consecutive, prospective case series. Each case series enrolled 24 patients. The case series underwent one-stage implantation of the Wide Ponto implant BAHS using either a linear incision technique with subcutaneous reduction or a linear incision technique without subcutaneous reduction. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were measured using resonance frequency analysis and soft tissue reactions were graded according to Holgers’ classification system. Follow-up visits were performed at 10 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and annually up to 4 years (tissue preservation) or 5 years (tissue reduction) postoperatively.

Results

The two case series had homogenous patient populations and followed an identical postoperative scheme. The ISQ values increased consistently the first 12 months for both groups (p ≤ 0.001), and were higher in the tissue preservation case series, (p = 0.04, 9 mm abutment). More than 91% of the soft tissue observations were assessed as Holgers’ grade 0 or 1. One implant (2.1%) was lost due to trauma.

Conclusion

In both case series, the Wide Ponto implant showed increasing implant stability during the follow-up period from the time of surgery, irrespective of surgical technique, indicating good osseointegration. Soft tissue reactions were rare and of minor severity. Implant survival was high.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tjellström A, Lindström J, Hallén O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 2:304–310PubMed Tjellström A, Lindström J, Hallén O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 2:304–310PubMed
2.
go back to reference Holgers KM, Tjellström A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE (1988) Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 9:56–59PubMed Holgers KM, Tjellström A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE (1988) Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 9:56–59PubMed
Metadata
Title
Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques
Authors
Martin Reznitsky
Kirsten Wielandt
Søren Foghsgaard
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5228-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2019 Go to the issue