Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011

01-04-2011 | Letter

Who should decide the best minimally invasive approach? Should we listen to our patients?

Authors: Leandro Totti Cavazzola, Gustavo Lopes de Carvalho, José Sérgio Nascimento Silva

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

To the Editors, …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rao AS, Kynaston J, MacDonald ER, Ahmeduld I (2010) Patient preferences for new techniques: should we invest in new approaches? Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1078-y Rao AS, Kynaston J, MacDonald ER, Ahmeduld I (2010) Patient preferences for new techniques: should we invest in new approaches? Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1078-y
2.
go back to reference Muller EM, Cavazzola LT, Machado Grossi JV, Mariano MB, Morales C, Brun M (2010) Training for laparoendocopic single-site surgery (LESS). Int J Surg 8:64–68PubMedCrossRef Muller EM, Cavazzola LT, Machado Grossi JV, Mariano MB, Morales C, Brun M (2010) Training for laparoendocopic single-site surgery (LESS). Int J Surg 8:64–68PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carvalho GL, Silva FW, Silva JS, de Albuquerque PP, Coelho Rde M, Vilaca TG, Lacerda CM (2009) Needlescopic clipless cholecystectomy as an efficient, safe, and cost-effective alternative with diminutive scars: the first 1,000 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:368–372PubMedCrossRef Carvalho GL, Silva FW, Silva JS, de Albuquerque PP, Coelho Rde M, Vilaca TG, Lacerda CM (2009) Needlescopic clipless cholecystectomy as an efficient, safe, and cost-effective alternative with diminutive scars: the first 1,000 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:368–372PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Podolsky ER, Curcillo PG (2010) Reduced-port surgery: preservation of the critical view in single-port-access cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1081-3 Podolsky ER, Curcillo PG (2010) Reduced-port surgery: preservation of the critical view in single-port-access cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1081-3
5.
go back to reference Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jones KB Jr, Afram JD, Benotti PN, Capella RF, Cooper CG, Flanagan L, Hendrick S, Howell LM, Jaroch MT, Kole K, Lirio OC, Sapala JA, Schuhknecht MP, Shapiro RP, Sweet WA, Wood MH (2006) Open versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study of over 25,000 open cases and the major laparoscopic bariatric reported series. Obes Surg 16:721–727PubMedCrossRef Jones KB Jr, Afram JD, Benotti PN, Capella RF, Cooper CG, Flanagan L, Hendrick S, Howell LM, Jaroch MT, Kole K, Lirio OC, Sapala JA, Schuhknecht MP, Shapiro RP, Sweet WA, Wood MH (2006) Open versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study of over 25,000 open cases and the major laparoscopic bariatric reported series. Obes Surg 16:721–727PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A (2009) Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1770–1774PubMedCrossRef Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A (2009) Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1770–1774PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Becerra Garcia FC, Romo-Medrano Mora KE (2010) Our perception of “women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery”: let the voices be heard, not just counted. Surg Endosc 24:1226–1228PubMedCrossRef Becerra Garcia FC, Romo-Medrano Mora KE (2010) Our perception of “women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery”: let the voices be heard, not just counted. Surg Endosc 24:1226–1228PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Horgan S, Cullen JP, Talamini MA, Mintz Y, Ferreres A, Jacobsen GR, Sandler B, Bosia J, Savides T, Easter DW, Savu MK, Ramamoorthy SL, Whitcomb E, Agarwal S, Lukacz E, Dominguez G, Ferraina P (2009) Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 23:1512–1518PubMedCrossRef Horgan S, Cullen JP, Talamini MA, Mintz Y, Ferreres A, Jacobsen GR, Sandler B, Bosia J, Savides T, Easter DW, Savu MK, Ramamoorthy SL, Whitcomb E, Agarwal S, Lukacz E, Dominguez G, Ferraina P (2009) Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 23:1512–1518PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ross SB, Morton CA, Boyle R (2010) Citizen perceptions of LESS surgery and NOTES: the impact of age, gender, and BMI. Program and abstracts of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT), 1–5 May 2010, New Orleans, LA (Abstract 795) Ross SB, Morton CA, Boyle R (2010) Citizen perceptions of LESS surgery and NOTES: the impact of age, gender, and BMI. Program and abstracts of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT), 1–5 May 2010, New Orleans, LA (Abstract 795)
13.
go back to reference Detry O, Nsadi B, Kohnen L (2010) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): when a step forward may be a step too soon or too far. Surg Endosc 24:1213–1214PubMedCrossRef Detry O, Nsadi B, Kohnen L (2010) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): when a step forward may be a step too soon or too far. Surg Endosc 24:1213–1214PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Who should decide the best minimally invasive approach? Should we listen to our patients?
Authors
Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Gustavo Lopes de Carvalho
José Sérgio Nascimento Silva
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1320-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011 Go to the issue