Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2009

01-08-2009

Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery

Authors: Carrie Y. Peterson, Sonia Ramamoorthy, Barbara Andrews, Santiago Horgan, Mark Talamini, Alana Chock

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Two decades ago, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was introduced and led to a revolution in modern surgery. Currently MIS procedures are the standard of care for many surgical interventions and patients often seek out surgeons with special training in MIS. Today, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) appears to be on the threshold of another such revolution. We surmise that its advantages are similar to those of other MIS procedures, but there are no associated abdominal wall complications as there are no abdominal incisions. To date, there is no data evaluating women’s perceptions of such a procedure and their willingness to consent to this type of surgical approach.

Methods

We surveyed 100 women who were given a written description of MIS and NOTES surgery along with a 10-question survey exploring their concerns and opinions regarding transvaginal surgery.

Results

The majority of women (68%) indicated that they would want a transvaginal procedure in the future because of decreased risk of hernia and decreased operative pain (90 and 93%, respectively), while only 39% were concerned with the improved cosmesis of NOTES surgery. Of the women polled, nulliparous women and those under age 45 years were significantly more often concerned with how transvaginal surgery may affect healthy sexual life and fertility issues (p < 0.05). Of the women who would not prefer transvaginal surgery, a significant number indicated concerns over infectious issues (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study shows that there is considerable public interest in NOTES surgery and women would be receptive to this new surgical technique. Our study highlights a strong need for early reporting of outcomes data to enlighten ourselves, and our patients, about this exciting new technology.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Volkmann E, Hungness ES, Soper NJ (2007) Patient perceptions of natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES). Surg Endosc 21:S349 Volkmann E, Hungness ES, Soper NJ (2007) Patient perceptions of natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES). Surg Endosc 21:S349
2.
3.
go back to reference Meltomaa SS, Makinen JI, Taalikka MO, Helenius HY (1999) One-year cohort of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies: complications and subjective outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 189:389–396PubMedCrossRef Meltomaa SS, Makinen JI, Taalikka MO, Helenius HY (1999) One-year cohort of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies: complications and subjective outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 189:389–396PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kafy S, Huang JY, Al-Sunaidi M, Wiener D, Tulandi T (2006) Audit of morbidity and mortality rates of 1972 hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:55–59PubMedCrossRef Kafy S, Huang JY, Al-Sunaidi M, Wiener D, Tulandi T (2006) Audit of morbidity and mortality rates of 1972 hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:55–59PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Long CY, Fang JH, Chen WC, Su JH, Hsu SC (2002) Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 53:214–219PubMedCrossRef Long CY, Fang JH, Chen WC, Su JH, Hsu SC (2002) Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 53:214–219PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Candiani GB, Candiani M (1996) Posthysterectomy fallopian tube herniation. A report of two cases. J Reprod Med 41:915–920PubMed Candiani GB, Candiani M (1996) Posthysterectomy fallopian tube herniation. A report of two cases. J Reprod Med 41:915–920PubMed
Metadata
Title
Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery
Authors
Carrie Y. Peterson
Sonia Ramamoorthy
Barbara Andrews
Santiago Horgan
Mark Talamini
Alana Chock
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0206-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2009 Go to the issue

News and notices

News and notices