Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Review Paper

What is Single-Payer Health Care? A Review of Definitions and Proposals in the U.S.

Authors: Jodi L. Liu, PhD, MSPH, Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Single-payer systems have been proposed as a health care reform alternative in the United States. However, there is no consensus on the definition of single-payer. Most definitions characterize single-payer as one entity that collects funds and pays for health care on behalf on an entire population. Increased flexibility for state health care reform may provide opportunities for state-based single-payer systems to be considered.

Objective

To explore the concept of single-payer and to describe the contents of single-payer health care proposals.

Design

We compared single-payer definitions and proposals. We coded the proposal text for provisions that would change how the health care system functions and could impact health care access, quality, and cost.

Main Measures

The share of proposals that include changes to the financing, pooling, purchasing, and delivery of health care; and possible impact on access, quality, and costs.

Key Results

We identified 25 proposals for national or state single-payer plans from journal and legislative databases. The proposals typically call for wide-ranging reform; nearly all include changes across the financing, pooling, purchasing, and delivery of health care services. Many provisions aiming to improve access, quality, and cost containment are also included, but the proposals vary in how they plan to achieve these improvements. Common provisions are related to comprehensive benefits, patient choice of providers, little or no cost sharing, the role of private insurance, provider guidelines and standards, periodic reviews of the benefits package, electronic medical records and billing, prescription drug formulary, global budgets, administrative cost thresholds, payment reform and studies, and the authority to implement cost-containment strategies.

Conclusions

Single-payer systems are heterogeneous. Acknowledgment of what is considered as single-payer and the characteristics that are variable is important for nuanced policy discussions on specific reform proposals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harrison B. A historical survey of national health movements and public opinion in the United States. JAMA. 2003;289(9):1163–4.CrossRefPubMed Harrison B. A historical survey of national health movements and public opinion in the United States. JAMA. 2003;289(9):1163–4.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kaiser Family Foundation. National health insurance – a brief history of reform efforts in the U.S. Menlo Park, CA Kaiser Family Foundation; 2009. Kaiser Family Foundation. National health insurance – a brief history of reform efforts in the U.S. Menlo Park, CA Kaiser Family Foundation; 2009.
3.
go back to reference Vt. Acts & Resolves 48. An act relating to a universal and unified health system. 2011. Vt. Acts & Resolves 48. An act relating to a universal and unified health system. 2011.
4.
go back to reference State of Vermont Agency of Administration, Health Care Reform. Green mountain care: a comprehensive model for building Vermont’s universal health care system. Montpelier, VT; 2014. State of Vermont Agency of Administration, Health Care Reform. Green mountain care: a comprehensive model for building Vermont’s universal health care system. Montpelier, VT; 2014.
5.
go back to reference McDonough JE. The demise of Vermont’s single-payer plan. N Eng J Med. 2015;372(17):1584–5.CrossRef McDonough JE. The demise of Vermont’s single-payer plan. N Eng J Med. 2015;372(17):1584–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hanel J, Downs A, Clark B, Foster C, Goeken D, Lueck M, et al. ColoradoCare: An independent analysis. Denver, CO: Colorado Health Institute; 2016. Hanel J, Downs A, Clark B, Foster C, Goeken D, Lueck M, et al. ColoradoCare: An independent analysis. Denver, CO: Colorado Health Institute; 2016.
8.
go back to reference Sparer MS, Brown LD, Jacobs LR. Exploring the concept of single payer. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):447–51.CrossRefPubMed Sparer MS, Brown LD, Jacobs LR. Exploring the concept of single payer. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):447–51.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tuohy CH. Single payers, multiple systems: the scope and limits of subnational variation under a federal health policy framework. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):453–96.CrossRefPubMed Tuohy CH. Single payers, multiple systems: the scope and limits of subnational variation under a federal health policy framework. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):453–96.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kutzin J. A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements. Health Policy. 2001;56(3):171–204.CrossRefPubMed Kutzin J. A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements. Health Policy. 2001;56(3):171–204.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Slee VN, Slee DA. Health care reform terms: An explanatory glossary of words, phrases, & acronyms used in today’s U.S. "health care reform" movement. Second edition. St. Paul, MN: Tringa Press; 1994. Slee VN, Slee DA. Health care reform terms: An explanatory glossary of words, phrases, & acronyms used in today’s U.S. "health care reform" movement. Second edition. St. Paul, MN: Tringa Press; 1994.
12.
go back to reference Oliver A. The single-payer option: A reconsideration. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):509–30.CrossRefPubMed Oliver A. The single-payer option: A reconsideration. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):509–30.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference White J. Gap and parallel insurance in health care systems with mandatory contributions to a single funding pool for core medical and hospital benefits for all citizens in any given geographic area. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):543–83.CrossRefPubMed White J. Gap and parallel insurance in health care systems with mandatory contributions to a single funding pool for core medical and hospital benefits for all citizens in any given geographic area. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):543–83.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Blewett LA. Persistent disparities in access to care across health care systems. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):635–47.CrossRefPubMed Blewett LA. Persistent disparities in access to care across health care systems. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):635–47.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Stone D. Single payer: good metaphor, bad politics. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):531–42.CrossRefPubMed Stone D. Single payer: good metaphor, bad politics. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(4):531–42.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Woolhandler S, Angell M, Young QD, Himmelstein DU. Proposal of the Physicians’ Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance. JAMA. 2003;290(6):798–805.CrossRefPubMed Woolhandler S, Angell M, Young QD, Himmelstein DU. Proposal of the Physicians’ Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance. JAMA. 2003;290(6):798–805.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hagopian K, Goldman D. The Health-Insurance Solution. National Affairs. 2012;13:95–111. Hagopian K, Goldman D. The Health-Insurance Solution. National Affairs. 2012;13:95–111.
19.
go back to reference Expanded & Improved Medicare For All Act, H.R. 676, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Cong., 1st Sess. 2015. Expanded & Improved Medicare For All Act, H.R. 676, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Cong., 1st Sess. 2015.
20.
go back to reference American Health Security Act of 2013, S. 1782, U.S. Senate, 113th Cong., 1st Sess. 2013. American Health Security Act of 2013, S. 1782, U.S. Senate, 113th Cong., 1st Sess. 2013.
21.
go back to reference American Health Security Act of 2015, H.R. 1200, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Cong., 1st Sess. 2015. American Health Security Act of 2015, H.R. 1200, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Cong., 1st Sess. 2015.
22.
go back to reference National Health Insurance Act, H.R. 15, U.S. House of Representatives, 111th Cong., 1st Sess. 2009. National Health Insurance Act, H.R. 15, U.S. House of Representatives, 111th Cong., 1st Sess. 2009.
23.
go back to reference H.B. 2677, 48th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. Sess. Ariz. 2007. H.B. 2677, 48th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. Sess. Ariz. 2007.
24.
25.
go back to reference H.B. 74, 147th Gen. Assem. Sess. Del. 2013. H.B. 74, 147th Gen. Assem. Sess. Del. 2013.
26.
go back to reference H.B. 942, 98th Gen. Assem. Sess. Ill. 2013. H.B. 942, 98th Gen. Assem. Sess. Ill. 2013.
27.
28.
29.
go back to reference H.P. 962, 126th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. Sess. Me. 2013. H.P. 962, 126th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. Sess. Me. 2013.
30.
go back to reference H.F. 76, 2012 Leg., 88th Sess. Sess. Minn. 2012. H.F. 76, 2012 Leg., 88th Sess. Sess. Minn. 2012.
31.
go back to reference S.B. 226, 51st Leg., 1st Sess. Sess. N.M. 2013. S.B. 226, 51st Leg., 1st Sess. Sess. N.M. 2013.
32.
go back to reference A. 5389A, 2013–2014 Gen. Assem., Reg. Sess. Sess. N.Y. 2013. A. 5389A, 2013–2014 Gen. Assem., Reg. Sess. Sess. N.Y. 2013.
33.
go back to reference S.B. 104 / H.B. 121, 130th Gen. Assem., Reg. Sess. Sess. Ohio 2013. S.B. 104 / H.B. 121, 130th Gen. Assem., Reg. Sess. Sess. Ohio 2013.
34.
go back to reference H.B. 2992, 77th Leg., Reg. Sess. Sess. Or. 2013. H.B. 2992, 77th Leg., Reg. Sess. Sess. Or. 2013.
35.
36.
go back to reference H.B. 1085 / S.B. 5224, 63rd Leg., Reg. Sess. Sess. Wash. 2013. H.B. 1085 / S.B. 5224, 63rd Leg., Reg. Sess. Sess. Wash. 2013.
37.
39.
go back to reference Himmelstein DU, Jun M, Busse R, Chevreul K, Geissler A, Jeurissen P, et al. A comparison of hospital administrative costs in eight nations: US costs exceed all others by far. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(9):1586–94.CrossRef Himmelstein DU, Jun M, Busse R, Chevreul K, Geissler A, Jeurissen P, et al. A comparison of hospital administrative costs in eight nations: US costs exceed all others by far. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(9):1586–94.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Calfee JE. Pharmaceutical price controls and patient welfare. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(11):1060–4.CrossRefPubMed Calfee JE. Pharmaceutical price controls and patient welfare. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(11):1060–4.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Cubanski J, Neuman T. Searching for savings in Medicare drug price negotiations. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation, 2016. Cubanski J, Neuman T. Searching for savings in Medicare drug price negotiations. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation, 2016.
42.
go back to reference Pollack H. Medicare for All if it were politically possible would necessarily replicate the defects of our current system. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015;40(4):923–31.CrossRefPubMed Pollack H. Medicare for All if it were politically possible would necessarily replicate the defects of our current system. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015;40(4):923–31.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference McDonough JE. Wyden’s waiver: State innovation on steroids. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014;39(5):1099–111.CrossRefPubMed McDonough JE. Wyden’s waiver: State innovation on steroids. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014;39(5):1099–111.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Blumenthal D, Collins SR. Health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act—a progress report. N Eng J Med. 2014;371(3):275–81.CrossRef Blumenthal D, Collins SR. Health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act—a progress report. N Eng J Med. 2014;371(3):275–81.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Corlette S, Volk J, Berenson R, Feder J. Narrow provider networks in new health plans: balancing affordability with access to quality care. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Health Insurance Reforms, The Urban Institute; 2014. Corlette S, Volk J, Berenson R, Feder J. Narrow provider networks in new health plans: balancing affordability with access to quality care. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Health Insurance Reforms, The Urban Institute; 2014.
46.
go back to reference Deber RB. Health care reform: Lessons from Canada. Amer J Public Health. 2003;93(1):20–4.CrossRef Deber RB. Health care reform: Lessons from Canada. Amer J Public Health. 2003;93(1):20–4.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Palmisano DJ. The danger of single-payer health insurance. Arch Internal Med. 2004;164(20):2281–2.CrossRef Palmisano DJ. The danger of single-payer health insurance. Arch Internal Med. 2004;164(20):2281–2.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Shaw JC. Oh, Canada: Comparing single-payer health care with practice in the United States. Am J Med. 2005;118(10):1064–6.CrossRefPubMed Shaw JC. Oh, Canada: Comparing single-payer health care with practice in the United States. Am J Med. 2005;118(10):1064–6.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Thomson S, Osborn R, Squires D, Jun M. International profiles of health care systems, 2013: Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2013. Thomson S, Osborn R, Squires D, Jun M. International profiles of health care systems, 2013: Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2013.
50.
go back to reference Mossialos E, Thomson S. Voluntary health insurance in the European Union. Brussels, Belgium: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2004. Mossialos E, Thomson S. Voluntary health insurance in the European Union. Brussels, Belgium: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2004.
51.
go back to reference Mossialos E, Wenzel M, Osborn R, Sarnak D. 2015 International profiles of health care systems. New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund; 2016.CrossRef Mossialos E, Wenzel M, Osborn R, Sarnak D. 2015 International profiles of health care systems. New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund; 2016.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Cubanski J, Swoope C, Boccuti C, Jacobson G, Casillas G, Griffin S, et al. A primer on Medicare: key facts about the Medicare program and the people it covers. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA; 2015. Cubanski J, Swoope C, Boccuti C, Jacobson G, Casillas G, Griffin S, et al. A primer on Medicare: key facts about the Medicare program and the people it covers. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA; 2015.
53.
go back to reference Gruber J. Proposal 3: Restructuring cost sharing and supplemental insurance for Medicare. Brookings Institute, The Hamilton Project, Washington, DC; 2013. Gruber J. Proposal 3: Restructuring cost sharing and supplemental insurance for Medicare. Brookings Institute, The Hamilton Project, Washington, DC; 2013.
54.
go back to reference Hogan C. Exploring the effects of secondary coverage on Medicare spending for the elderly. Washington, DC: Direct Research, LLC; 2014. Hogan C. Exploring the effects of secondary coverage on Medicare spending for the elderly. Washington, DC: Direct Research, LLC; 2014.
Metadata
Title
What is Single-Payer Health Care? A Review of Definitions and Proposals in the U.S.
Authors
Jodi L. Liu, PhD, MSPH
Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4063-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.