Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2007

01-05-2007 | Original Article

What are the Essential Elements to Enable Patient Participation in Medical Decision Making?

Authors: Liana Fraenkel, MD, MPH, Sarah McGraw, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient participation in shared decision making (SDM) results in increased patient knowledge, adherence, and improved outcomes. Despite the benefits of the SDM model, many patients do not attain the level of participation they desire.

OBJECTIVE

To gain a more complete understanding of the essential elements, or the prerequisites, critical to active patient participation in medical decision making from the patient’s perspective.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Individual, in-depth patient interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Two analysts independently read the transcripts and jointly developed a list of codes.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six consecutive subjects drawn from community dwelling subjects undergoing bone density measurements.

MEASUREMENTS

Respondents’ experiences and beliefs related to patient participation in SDM.

RESULTS

Five elements were repeatedly described by respondents as being essential to enable patient participation in medical decision making: (1) patient knowledge, (2) explicit encouragement of patient participation by physicians, (3) appreciation of the patient’s responsibility/rights to play an active role in decision making, (4) awareness of choice, and (5) time.

LIMITATIONS

The generalizability of the results is limited by the homogeneity of the study sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings have important clinical implications and suggest that several needs must be met before patients can become active participants in decisions related to their health care. These needs include ensuring that patients (1) appreciate that there is uncertainty in medicine and “buy in” to the importance of active patient participation in decisions related to their health care, (2) understand the trade-offs related to available options, and (3) have the opportunity to discuss these options with their physician to arrive at a decision concordant with their values.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2003;140:54–9. Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2003;140:54–9.
2.
go back to reference Kassirer JP. Incorporating patients’ preferences into medical decisions. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1895–6.PubMedCrossRef Kassirer JP. Incorporating patients’ preferences into medical decisions. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1895–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE, Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.PubMed Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE, Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2701–8.PubMedCrossRef Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2701–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Gard P, Thornhill D, Macfarlane R, Hubbard R. Reducing antibiotic use for acute bronchitis in primary care: blinded, randomised controlled trial of patient information leaflet. BMJ. 2002;324:91–4.PubMedCrossRef Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Gard P, Thornhill D, Macfarlane R, Hubbard R. Reducing antibiotic use for acute bronchitis in primary care: blinded, randomised controlled trial of patient information leaflet. BMJ. 2002;324:91–4.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference van Dam HA, van der Horst F, van den Borne B, Ryckman R, Crebolder H. Provider–patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patients self-care and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51:17–28.PubMedCrossRef van Dam HA, van der Horst F, van den Borne B, Ryckman R, Crebolder H. Provider–patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patients self-care and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51:17–28.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ward MM, Sundaramurthy S, Lotstein D, Bush TM, Neuwelt CM, Street RJ. Participatory patient–physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:810–18.PubMedCrossRef Ward MM, Sundaramurthy S, Lotstein D, Bush TM, Neuwelt CM, Street RJ. Participatory patient–physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:810–18.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Street RL, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:298–306.PubMedCrossRef Street RL, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:298–306.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Souchek J, Stacks JR, Brody B, et al. A trial for comparing methods for eliciting treatment preferences from men with advanced prostate cancer: results from the initial visit. Med Care. 2000;38:1040–50.PubMedCrossRef Souchek J, Stacks JR, Brody B, et al. A trial for comparing methods for eliciting treatment preferences from men with advanced prostate cancer: results from the initial visit. Med Care. 2000;38:1040–50.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1865–78.PubMedCrossRef Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1865–78.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bilodeau BA, Degner LF. Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:691–6.PubMed Bilodeau BA, Degner LF. Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:691–6.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277:1485–92.PubMedCrossRef Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277:1485–92.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1473–9.PubMedCrossRef Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1473–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Till JE. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989;82:260–3.PubMed Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Till JE. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989;82:260–3.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Caress AL. Patient roles in decision-making. Nurs Times. 1997;93:45–8.PubMed Caress AL. Patient roles in decision-making. Nurs Times. 1997;93:45–8.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision-making. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–5.PubMedCrossRef Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision-making. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions-challenges for doctors. BMJ. 2003;327:542–5.PubMedCrossRef Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions-challenges for doctors. BMJ. 2003;327:542–5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Street RL, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care. 2005;43:960–9.PubMedCrossRef Street RL, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care. 2005;43:960–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink DR. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(5):729–35.PubMedCrossRef Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink DR. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(5):729–35.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994. Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
21.
go back to reference Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967. Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
22.
go back to reference Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994. Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
23.
go back to reference Weitzman EA. Software and qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999. Weitzman EA. Software and qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
24.
go back to reference Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making? Health Expect. 2004;7:317–26.PubMedCrossRef Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making? Health Expect. 2004;7:317–26.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003:CD001431. O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003:CD001431.
Metadata
Title
What are the Essential Elements to Enable Patient Participation in Medical Decision Making?
Authors
Liana Fraenkel, MD, MPH
Sarah McGraw, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0149-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2007 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.