Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Palliative Care
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

What are the differences among occupational groups related to their palliative care-specific educational needs and intensity of interprofessional collaboration in long-term care homes?

Authors: S. Kaasalainen, T. Sussman, M. Bui, N. Akhtar-Danesh, R. D. Laporte, L. McCleary, A. Wickson Griffiths, K. Brazil, D. Parker, V. Dal Bello-Haas, A. Papaioannou, J. O’Leary, the SPA-LTC Team

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the differences across occupational groups related to their end-of-life care-specific educational needs and reported intensity of interprofessional collaboration in long-term care (LTC) homes.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey, based on two questionnaires, was administered at four LTC homes in Ontario, Canada using a modified Dilman’s approach. The first questionnaire, End of Life Professional Caregiver Survey, included three domains: patients and family-centered communication, cultural and ethical values, effective care delivery. The Intensity of Interprofessional Collaboration Scale included two subscales: care sharing activities, and interprofessional coordination. In total, 697 LTC staff were given surveys, including personal support workers, support staff (housekeeping, kitchen, recreation, laundry, dietician aids, office staff), and registered staff (licensed nurses, physiotherapists, social workers, pharmacists, physicians).

Results

A total of 317 participants completed the survey (126 personal support workers, 109 support staff, 82 registered staff) for a response rate of 45%. Significant differences emerged among occupational groups across all scales and subscales. Specifically, support staff rated their comfort of working with dying patients significantly lower than both nurses and PSWs. Support staff also reported significantly lower ratings of care sharing activities and interprofessional coordination compared to both registered staff and personal support workers.

Conclusions

These study findings suggest there are differing educational needs and sense of interprofessional collaboration among LTC staff, specific to discipline group. Both the personal support workers and support staff groups appeared to have higher needs for education; support staff also reported higher needs related to integration on the interdisciplinary team. Efforts to build capacity within support staff related to working with dying residents and their families are needed. Optimal palliative care may require resources to increase the availability of support for all staff involved in the care of patients.
Literature
1.
Silversides, A. (2009). Long-term Care in Canada.
2.
3.
Quality End-of-Life Care Coalition of Canada. Blueprint for Action 2010 to 2020: A Progress Report. Quality End-of-Life Care Coalition of Canada (QELCCC), (January).2010.
4.
Brazil K, Bédard M, Krueger P, Taniguchi A, Lou M, Carrie K. Barriers to providing care in long-term care facilities. Can Fam Physician. 2006;52(1):472–8.PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
6.
Jayaraman J, Joseph KS. Determinants of place of death: a population-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12:1–9.CrossRef
7.
8.
9.
10.
Doupe M, Fransoo R, Chateau D, Dik N, Burchill C, Soodeen RA, et al. Population aging and the continuum of older adult care in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy; 2011.
11.
12.
Hall P, Schroder C, Weaver L. The last 48 hours of life in long-term care: a focused chart audit. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:501–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Proctor W, Hirdes J. Pain and cognitive status among nursing home residents in Canada. Pain Res Manag. 2001;6:119–25.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2112–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
16.
Kaasalainen S, Brazil K, Ploeg J, Martin LS. Nurses’ perceptions around providing palliative care for long-term care residents with dementia. J Palliat Care. 2007;23(3):173–80.PubMed
17.
Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, Welch LC, Wetle T, Shield R, et al. Family perspectives on end of life care at the last place of care. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291:88–93.CrossRef
18.
19.
20.
21.
Heyland DK, Allan DE, Rocker G, Dodek P, Pichora D, Gafni A. Discussing prognosis with patients and their families near the end of life: impact on satisfaction with end-of-life care. Open Med. 2009;3(2):71–80.
22.
23.
24.
Schmidt I, Claesson CB, Westerholm B, Nilsson LG, Svarstad BL. The impact of regular multidisciplinary team interventions on psychotropic prescribing in Swedish nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(1):77–82.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Lazenby M, Ercolano E, Schulman-Green D, McCorkle R. Validity of the End-of-life professional caregiver survey to assess for multidisciplinary educational needs. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(4):427-31. doi:10.​1089/​jpm.​2011.​0246.
26.
Sicotte C, D’Amour D, Moreault MP. Interdisciplinary collaboration within Quebec community health care centres. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(6):991–1003.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Swinney R, Lu Y, Lee A, Rubin D, Anderson C. The role of support staff in pediatric palliative care: their perceptions, training, and available resources. J Palliat Care. 2007;23(1):44–50.PubMed
28.
Doka K. Disenfranchised grief: new directions, challenges, and strategies for practice. Champaign, IL: Research Press; 2002.
29.
Spidell S, Wallace A, Carmack C, Nogureras-Gonzales G, Parker C, Cantor S. Grief in healthcare chaplains: investigation of the presence of disenfranchised grief. J Health Care Chaplain. 2011;17:75–86.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Anderson K, Gaugler J. The grief experiences of certified nursing assistants: personal growth and complicated grief. Omega (Westport). 2006;54:301–18.CrossRef
31.
Robson P, Walter T. Hierarchies of loss: a critique of disenfranchised grief. Omega. 2013;66(2):97–119.
32.
Wlodarczyk N. The effect of a group music intervention for grief resolution on disenfranchised grief of hospice workers. Progress in Palliative Care. 2013;21(2):97–106.CrossRef
33.
34.
35.
Quigley P, White S. Hospital-based fall program measurement and improvement in high reliability organizations. OJIN:Online J Issues Nurs. 2013;18(2)
36.
Wickson-Griffiths A, Kaasalainen S, Brazil K, McAiney C, Crawshaw D, Turner M, Kelley ML. Comfort care Rounds: a staff capacity-building initiative in LTC. J Gerontol Nurs. 2015;18:1–7.
37.
Hockley J, Froggat K. The development of palliative care knowledge in care homes for older people: the place for action research. Palliat Med. 2006;20:835–43.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Kaasalainen S, Brazil K, Akhtar-Danesh N, Coker E, Ploeg J, Donald F, Martin-Misener R, DiCenso A, Hadjistavropoulos T, Dolovich L, Papaioannou P. (2012). The evaluation of an interdisciplinary pain protocol in long-term care. JAMDA, published online, doi.​Org/​10.​1016/​j.​Jamda.​2012.​05.​013.
39.
Parker D, Hughes K, Tuckett A. Comprehensive evidence-based palliative approach in residential aged care: final Report: The University of Queenland/Blue Care Research & Practice Development Centre; 2010.
40.
41.
Wittenberg-Lyles E. Information sharing in interdisciplinary team meetings: an evaluation of hospice goals. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1377–91.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Arber A. Pain talk in hospice and palliative care team meetings: an ethnography. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(6):916–26.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Goldsmith J, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Rodrigues D, Samcjes-Reilly S. Interdisciplinary geriatric and palliative care team narratives: collaboration practices and barriers. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(1):93–104.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Kaasalainen S, Brazil K, Kelley ML. Building capacity in palliative care for personal support workers in long term care through experiential learning. Int J Older People Nursing. 2014;9(2):151–8. doi:10.​1111/​opn.​12008.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What are the differences among occupational groups related to their palliative care-specific educational needs and intensity of interprofessional collaboration in long-term care homes?
Authors
S. Kaasalainen
T. Sussman
M. Bui
N. Akhtar-Danesh
R. D. Laporte
L. McCleary
A. Wickson Griffiths
K. Brazil
D. Parker
V. Dal Bello-Haas
A. Papaioannou
J. O’Leary
the SPA-LTC Team
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0207-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Palliative Care 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Self-management support and eHealth for patients and informal caregivers confronted with advanced cancer: an online focus group study among nurses

Research article

Factors that influence advance directives completion amongst terminally ill patients at a tertiary hospital in Kenya

Study protocol

Palliative care for patients with Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a mixed methods study

Research article

A prospective study on the characteristics and subjects of pediatric palliative care case management provided by a hospital based palliative care team

Research article

Exploring the rewards and challenges of paediatric palliative care work – a qualitative study of a multi-disciplinary children’s hospice care team

Research article

Self-confidence and knowledge of German ICU physicians in palliative care – a multicentre prospective study