Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dermatology and Therapy 11/2023

Open Access 15-09-2023 | Vulgar Psoriasis | Brief Report

Efficacy of Guselkumab in Treating Nails, Scalp, Hands, and Feet in Patients with Psoriasis and Self-reported Psoriatic Arthritis

Authors: Ana-Maria Orbai, Soumya D. Chakravarty, Yin You, May Shawi, Ya-Wen Yang, Joseph F. Merola

Published in: Dermatology and Therapy | Issue 11/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate guselkumab efficacy on regional psoriasis in a subset of psoriasis patients with a self-reported psoriatic arthritis (PsA) diagnosis.

Methods

In the phase 3 VOYAGE-1 and -2 studies, at week (W)0, patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg, placebo → guselkumab 100 mg at W16 through W44, or adalimumab 80 mg then 40 mg at W1 through W48 (VOYAGE-1) or W24 (VOYAGE-2). Pooled efficacy outcomes, including scalp-specific Investigator’s Global Assessment (ss-IGA), hands and/or feet Physician’s Global Assessment (hf-PGA), fingernail PGA (f-PGA), Nail Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (NAPSI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), were compared (nominal p-values) through W24 in patients with self-reported PsA diagnosis. Response rates/percentage improvement from baseline were determined, employing treatment failure rules and non-response/no improvement data imputation.

Results

A total of 76, 153, and 106 psoriasis patients with self-reported PsA were randomized to the placebo, guselkumab, or adalimumab groups, respectively; the baseline characteristics of patients in all three arms were comparable. At W16, a greater proportion of guselkumab- versus placebo-treated patients achieved ss-IGA 0/1 (80.6% vs. 22.7%, p < 0.001), hf-PGA 0/1 (68.9% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.001), f-PGA 0/1 (47.6% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001), and DLQI 0/1 (45.6% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001) responses; mean percentage NAPSI improvement was also greater with guselkumab (39.5% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001). At W24, patients receiving guselkumab had higher ss-IGA 0/1 (77.5% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.003) and DLQI 0/1 (47.7% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.024) response rates versus those receiving adalimumab. Response rates/mean percentage improvements at W48 (VOYAGE-1) were numerically greater with guselkumab than adalimumab (e.g., NAPSI improvement: 75.6% vs. 60.9%).

Conclusions

Guselkumab-treated patients with psoriasis and self-reported PsA showed meaningful improvements in nail, scalp, and palmoplantar psoriasis.

Trial Registration

VOYAGE-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02207231) and VOYAGE-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02207244).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coates LC, Soriano ER, Corp N, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18(8):465–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coates LC, Soriano ER, Corp N, et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18(8):465–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Merola JF, Qureshi A, Husni ME. Underdiagnosed and undertreated psoriasis: nuances of treating psoriasis affecting the scalp, face, intertriginous areas, genitals, hands, feet, and nails. Dermatol Ther. 2018;31(3):e12589.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Merola JF, Qureshi A, Husni ME. Underdiagnosed and undertreated psoriasis: nuances of treating psoriasis affecting the scalp, face, intertriginous areas, genitals, hands, feet, and nails. Dermatol Ther. 2018;31(3):e12589.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Mease PJ, Liu M, Rebello S, et al. Association of nail psoriasis with disease activity measures and impact in psoriatic arthritis: data from the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry. J Rheumatol. 2021;48(4):520–6.CrossRefPubMed Mease PJ, Liu M, Rebello S, et al. Association of nail psoriasis with disease activity measures and impact in psoriatic arthritis: data from the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry. J Rheumatol. 2021;48(4):520–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cengiz G, Nas K, Keskin Y, et al. The impact of nail psoriasis on disease activity, quality of life, and clinical variables in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional multicenter study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2023;26(1):43–50.CrossRefPubMed Cengiz G, Nas K, Keskin Y, et al. The impact of nail psoriasis on disease activity, quality of life, and clinical variables in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional multicenter study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2023;26(1):43–50.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mease PJ, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. Guselkumab in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (DISCOVER-2): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10230):1126–36.CrossRefPubMed Mease PJ, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. Guselkumab in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (DISCOVER-2): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10230):1126–36.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Boehncke WH, et al. Guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who were biologic-naive or had previously received TNFα inhibitor treatment (DISCOVER-1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10230):1115–25.CrossRefPubMed Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Boehncke WH, et al. Guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who were biologic-naive or had previously received TNFα inhibitor treatment (DISCOVER-1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10230):1115–25.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):405–17.CrossRefPubMed Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):405–17.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Reich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with randomized withdrawal and retreatment: Results from the phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 2 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):418–31.CrossRefPubMed Reich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with randomized withdrawal and retreatment: Results from the phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 2 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):418–31.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Foley P, Gordon K, Griffiths CEM, et al. Efficacy of guselkumab compared with adalimumab and placebo for psoriasis in specific body regions: a secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(6):676–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foley P, Gordon K, Griffiths CEM, et al. Efficacy of guselkumab compared with adalimumab and placebo for psoriasis in specific body regions: a secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(6):676–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Rich P, Scher RK. Nail Psoriasis Severity Index: a useful tool for evaluation of nail psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(2):206–12.CrossRefPubMed Rich P, Scher RK. Nail Psoriasis Severity Index: a useful tool for evaluation of nail psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(2):206–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)–a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210–6.CrossRefPubMed Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)–a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Aldredge LM, Higham RC. Manifestations and management of difficult-to-treat psoriasis. J Dermatol Nurses’ Assoc. 2018;10(4):189–97.CrossRef Aldredge LM, Higham RC. Manifestations and management of difficult-to-treat psoriasis. J Dermatol Nurses’ Assoc. 2018;10(4):189–97.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reich K, Dutz J, Foley P, et al. AB0759: Four-year efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis patients with and without psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:1677.CrossRef Reich K, Dutz J, Foley P, et al. AB0759: Four-year efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis patients with and without psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:1677.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Reich K, Gordon KB, Strober BE, et al. Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(6):1146–59.CrossRefPubMed Reich K, Gordon KB, Strober BE, et al. Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(6):1146–59.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Terui T, Kobayashi S, Okubo Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in Japanese patients with palmoplantar pustulosis: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(10):1153–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Terui T, Kobayashi S, Okubo Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in Japanese patients with palmoplantar pustulosis: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(10):1153–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lebwohl M, Langley RG, Paul C, et al. Evolution of patient perceptions of psoriatic disease: results from the Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights For Treatment (UPLIFT) Survey. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022;12(1):61–78.CrossRefPubMed Lebwohl M, Langley RG, Paul C, et al. Evolution of patient perceptions of psoriatic disease: results from the Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights For Treatment (UPLIFT) Survey. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022;12(1):61–78.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ritchlin CT, Mease PJ, Boehncke WH, et al. Sustained and improved guselkumab response in patients with active psoriatic arthritis regardless of baseline demographic and disease characteristics: pooled results through week 52 of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies. RMD Open. 2022;8(1): e002195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ritchlin CT, Mease PJ, Boehncke WH, et al. Sustained and improved guselkumab response in patients with active psoriatic arthritis regardless of baseline demographic and disease characteristics: pooled results through week 52 of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies. RMD Open. 2022;8(1): e002195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference McInnes IB, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of guselkumab, a monoclonal antibody specific to the p19 subunit of interleukin-23, through two years: results from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74(3):475–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McInnes IB, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of guselkumab, a monoclonal antibody specific to the p19 subunit of interleukin-23, through two years: results from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74(3):475–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Augustin M, Sommer R, Kirsten N, et al. Topology of psoriasis in routine care: results from high-resolution analysis of 2009 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(2):358–65.CrossRefPubMed Augustin M, Sommer R, Kirsten N, et al. Topology of psoriasis in routine care: results from high-resolution analysis of 2009 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(2):358–65.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lakuta P, Marcinkiewicz K, Bergler-Czop B, et al. Associations between site of skin lesions and depression, social anxiety, body-related emotions and feelings of stigmatization in psoriasis patients. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018;35(1):60–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lakuta P, Marcinkiewicz K, Bergler-Czop B, et al. Associations between site of skin lesions and depression, social anxiety, body-related emotions and feelings of stigmatization in psoriasis patients. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018;35(1):60–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of Guselkumab in Treating Nails, Scalp, Hands, and Feet in Patients with Psoriasis and Self-reported Psoriatic Arthritis
Authors
Ana-Maria Orbai
Soumya D. Chakravarty
Yin You
May Shawi
Ya-Wen Yang
Joseph F. Merola
Publication date
15-09-2023
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy / Issue 11/2023
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-01012-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2023

Dermatology and Therapy 11/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.