Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 9/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Visual acuity of dentists in their respective clinical conditions

Authors: Philippe Perrin, Simon T. Ramseyer, Martina Eichenberger, Adrian Lussi

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This study examined the impact of age and magnification on the near visual acuity of dentists in their private practice under simulated clinical conditions.

Materials and methods

Miniaturized visual tests were fixed in posterior teeth of a dental phantom head and brought to 31 dentists in their respective private practice. The visual acuity of these dentists (n = 19, ≥40 years; n = 12, <40 years) was measured in a clinical setting under the following conditions: (a) natural visual acuity, distance of 300 mm; (b) natural visual acuity, free choice of the distance; and (c) loupe and additional light source, if available.

Results

The visual acuity under the different clinical conditions varied widely between individuals. The older group of dentists had a lower median visual acuity value under all clinical conditions. This difference was highly significant for natural visual acuity at a free choice of distance (p < 0.0001). For younger dentists (<40 years), visual acuity could be significantly improved by reducing the eye-object distance (p = 0.001) or by using loupes (p = 0.008). For older dentists (≥40 years), visual acuity could be significantly improved by using loupes (p = 0.0005).

Conclusions

Visual performance decreased with increasing age under the specific clinical conditions of each dentist’s private practice. Magnification aids can compensate for visual deficiencies.

Clinical relevance

The question of whether findings obtained under standardized conditions are valuable for the habitual setting of each dentist’s private practice seems clinically relevant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zeiss C (2006) Das Magazin von Carl Zeiss. Innovation 17 Zeiss C (2006) Das Magazin von Carl Zeiss. Innovation 17
2.
go back to reference Schoeffl H, Lazzeri D, Schnelzer R, Froschauer SM, Huemer GM (2013) Optical magnification should be mandatory for microsurgery: scientific basis and clinical data contributing to quality assurance. Arch Plast Surg 40:104–108PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schoeffl H, Lazzeri D, Schnelzer R, Froschauer SM, Huemer GM (2013) Optical magnification should be mandatory for microsurgery: scientific basis and clinical data contributing to quality assurance. Arch Plast Surg 40:104–108PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Friedman M, Mora AF, Schmidt R (1999) Microscope-assisted precision dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20:723–728, 730–731, 735–736; quiz 737 Friedman M, Mora AF, Schmidt R (1999) Microscope-assisted precision dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20:723–728, 730–731, 735–736; quiz 737
4.
go back to reference Friedman MJ (2004) Magnification in a restorative dental practice: from loupes to microscopes. Compend Contin Educ Dent 25(48, 50):53–55 Friedman MJ (2004) Magnification in a restorative dental practice: from loupes to microscopes. Compend Contin Educ Dent 25(48, 50):53–55
5.
go back to reference Nase JB (2005) Clinical operating microscopes: they're not just for endodontists anymore. Pa Dent J (Harrisb) 72:30–33 Nase JB (2005) Clinical operating microscopes: they're not just for endodontists anymore. Pa Dent J (Harrisb) 72:30–33
6.
go back to reference Carr GB (1992) Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 20:55–61PubMed Carr GB (1992) Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 20:55–61PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hagge MS (2003) Use of surgical telescopes by senior dental students: a survey. J Prosthodont 12:271–279PubMedCrossRef Hagge MS (2003) Use of surgical telescopes by senior dental students: a survey. J Prosthodont 12:271–279PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Meraner M, Nase JB (2008) Magnification in dental practice and education: experience and attitudes of a dental school faculty. J Dent Educ 72:698–706PubMed Meraner M, Nase JB (2008) Magnification in dental practice and education: experience and attitudes of a dental school faculty. J Dent Educ 72:698–706PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bowers DJ, Glickman GN, Solomon ES, He J (2010) Magnification's effect on endodontic fine motor skills. J Endod 36:1135–1138PubMedCrossRef Bowers DJ, Glickman GN, Solomon ES, He J (2010) Magnification's effect on endodontic fine motor skills. J Endod 36:1135–1138PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Donaldson ME, Knight GW, Guenzel PJ (1998) The effect of magnification on student performance in pediatric operative dentistry. J Dent Educ 62:905–910PubMed Donaldson ME, Knight GW, Guenzel PJ (1998) The effect of magnification on student performance in pediatric operative dentistry. J Dent Educ 62:905–910PubMed
11.
go back to reference Forgie AH (2001) Magnification: what is available, and will it aid your clinical practice? Dent Updat 28(125–128):130 Forgie AH (2001) Magnification: what is available, and will it aid your clinical practice? Dent Updat 28(125–128):130
12.
go back to reference Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A (2011) Influence of loupes and age on the near visual acuity of practicing dentists. J Biomed Opt 16:035003PubMedCrossRef Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A (2011) Influence of loupes and age on the near visual acuity of practicing dentists. J Biomed Opt 16:035003PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A (2013) Visual acuity of dentists under simulated clinical conditions. Clin Oral Investig 17:725–729PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A (2013) Visual acuity of dentists under simulated clinical conditions. Clin Oral Investig 17:725–729PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pointer JS (1995) The presbyopic add. II. Age-related trend and a gender difference. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15:241–248PubMedCrossRef Pointer JS (1995) The presbyopic add. II. Age-related trend and a gender difference. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15:241–248PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gilbert JA (1980) The dentist and the aging eye. J Mo Dent Assoc 60:22–24PubMed Gilbert JA (1980) The dentist and the aging eye. J Mo Dent Assoc 60:22–24PubMed
17.
go back to reference Adams AJ, Wong LS, Wong L, Gould B (1988) Visual acuity changes with age: some new perspectives. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:403–406PubMedCrossRef Adams AJ, Wong LS, Wong L, Gould B (1988) Visual acuity changes with age: some new perspectives. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:403–406PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Forgie AH, Gearie T, Pine CM, Pitts NB (2001) Visual standards in a sample of dentists working within Scotland. Prim Dent Care 8:124–127PubMedCrossRef Forgie AH, Gearie T, Pine CM, Pitts NB (2001) Visual standards in a sample of dentists working within Scotland. Prim Dent Care 8:124–127PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sia DI, Martin S, Wittert G, Casson RJ (2012) Age-related change in contrast sensitivity among Australian male adults: Florey adult male ageing study. Acta Ophthalmol 91:312–317PubMedCrossRef Sia DI, Martin S, Wittert G, Casson RJ (2012) Age-related change in contrast sensitivity among Australian male adults: Florey adult male ageing study. Acta Ophthalmol 91:312–317PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nio YK, Jansonius NM, Fidler V, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Kooijman AC (2000) Age-related changes of defocus-specific contrast sensitivity in healthy subjects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 20:323–334PubMedCrossRef Nio YK, Jansonius NM, Fidler V, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Kooijman AC (2000) Age-related changes of defocus-specific contrast sensitivity in healthy subjects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 20:323–334PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Woo GC, Ing B (1988) Magnification devices for the presbyopic dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 54:447–449PubMed Woo GC, Ing B (1988) Magnification devices for the presbyopic dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 54:447–449PubMed
22.
go back to reference Trotter J (1995) Das Auge: Ein Handbuch für Augenoptiker. Neuauflage ed. Optik Verlag, Trimbach Trotter J (1995) Das Auge: Ein Handbuch für Augenoptiker. Neuauflage ed. Optik Verlag, Trimbach
23.
go back to reference Brunner E, Domhof S, Langer F (2002) Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. Wiley, New York Brunner E, Domhof S, Langer F (2002) Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. Wiley, New York
24.
go back to reference Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70 Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
Metadata
Title
Visual acuity of dentists in their respective clinical conditions
Authors
Philippe Perrin
Simon T. Ramseyer
Martina Eichenberger
Adrian Lussi
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1197-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

Clinical Oral Investigations 9/2014 Go to the issue