Top

BMC Oral Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Veneer | Research

Clinical survival of No-prep indirect composite laminate veneers: a 7-year prospective case series study

Authors: Ozge Kam Hepdeniz, Ugur Burak Temel

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Abstract

Background

The no preparation technique which is a reversible form of treatment characterized by the absence of tooth tissue preparation and preserves the soft tissue architecture while preserving all natural tooth structures is indicated in cases where the tooth structure allows material to be added. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance and survival rates of indirect composite laminate veneers with no preparation after 7 years.

Materials and methods

A total of 80 indirect composite veneers were placed on maxillary anterior teeth in 35 patients (n = 80). Diastema (n = 64), wedge tooth anomalies (n = 9) and re-shaping (n = 7) were the main indications for veneer treatments. All laminate veneers were fabricated with an indirect microhybrid composite material (Gradia, GC Dental). No tooth preparation was performed. Light-cured resin cement (Choice 2, Bisco) was used to lute the veneers. Composite veneers were evaluated using Modified United States Public Health Service criteria. Survival rates of the veneers were calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistics. The data containing the results of the USPHS criteria at baseline, 2 years and 7 years was statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test at the 0.05 level of significance.

Results

The overall survival rate was 91.3%. After 7 years, 7 absolute failures including 4 debonding (marginal adaptation, score 4) and 3 fractures (fracture of restoration, score 3) were noted. Color match was scored as 1 (n = 34) and 2 (n = 15). Slightly rough surfaces (41 of 73 laminates) and slight marginal discoloration (15 of 73 laminates) were noted. The overall scores after 84 months were significantly higher than the baseline scores for the marginal adaptation (p = 0.008), color match (p = 0.000), marginal discoloration (p = 0.000), surface roughness (p = 0.000), and fracture of restoration (p = 0.001) criteria.

Conclusions

In this study, indirect composite veneers without any preparation on maxillary anterior teeth showed acceptable performance in terms of both survival rate and quality of restorations. This procedure offers a predictable and successful treatment that ensures maximum preservation of the intact tooth.

Korkut B, Yanıkoğlu F, Günday M. Direct composite laminate veneers: three case reports. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7:105–11.PubMedPubMedCentral

Morita RK, Hayashida MF, Pupo YM, Berger G, Reggiani RD, Betiol EA. Minimally invasive laminate veneers: clinical aspects in treatment planning and cementation procedures. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016:1839793.PubMedPubMedCentral

Prajapati P, Sethuraman R, Naveen YG, Patel JR. Indirect laminate veneer: a conservative novel approach. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;23:1–3.

Cotert HS, Dundar M, Ozturk B. The effect of various preparation designs on the survival of porcelain laminate veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11:405–11.PubMed

Celik N, Yapar MI, Taşpınar N, Seven N. The effect of polymerization and preparation techniques on the microleakage of composite laminate veneers. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8:400–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

D’Arcangelo C, Vadini M, D’Amario M, Chiavaroli Z, De Angelis F. Protocol for a new concept of noprep ultrathin ceramic veneers. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30:173–9.CrossRefPubMed

Farias-Neto A, Gomes EM, Sánchez-Ayala A, Sánchez-Ayala A, Vilanova LSR. Esthetic rehabilitation of the smile with no-prep porcelain laminates and partial veneers. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:452765.PubMedPubMedCentral

Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM. Main clinical outcomes of feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and complication rates. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:38–49.CrossRefPubMed

Jia S, Chen D, Wang D, Bao X, Tian X. Comparing marginal microleakage of three different dental materials in veneer restoration using a stereomicroscope: an in vitro study. BDJ Open. 2017;3:16010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Vadini M, D’Amario M, De Angelis F, Falco A, D’Arcangelo C. No-Prep rehabilitation of fractured maxillary incisors with partial veneers. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28:351–8.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:181–90.PubMed

12.

da Cunha LF, Reis R, Santana L, Romanini JC, Carvalho RM, Furuse AY. Ceramic veneers with minimum preparation. Eur J Dent. 2013;7:492–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Mainjo AKJ, Charavet C. Orthodontic-assisted one step- no prep technique: a straightforward and minimally-invasive approach for localized tooth wear treatment using polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD-CAM prostheses. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32:645–61.CrossRef

14.

Javaheri D. Considerations for planning esthetic treatment with veneers involving no or minimal preparation. JADA. 2007;138:331–37.PubMed

15.

Chen YW, Raigrodski AJ. A conservative approach for treating young adult patients with porcelain laminate veneers. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20:223–38.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Özcan M. Clinical longevity of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with and without existing composite restorations up to 40 months. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:823–32.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Agustín-Panadero R, Ausina-Escrihuela D, Fernández-Estevan L, Román-Rodríguez JL, Faus-López J, Solá-Ruíz MF. Dental-gingival remodeling with BOPT no-prep veneers. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:1496–500.

18.

Balkaya H, Arslan S, Pala K. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:e20180678.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Ugurlu M, Sari F. The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(9):5785–93.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Rinke S, Bettenhäuser-Hartung L, Leha A, Rödiger M, Schmalz G, Ziebolz D. Retrospective evaluation of extended glass-ceramic ceramic laminate veneers after a mean observational period of 10 years. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(5):487–95.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6:65–76.PubMed

22.

Walls AW, Steele JG, Wassell RW. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J. 2002;193:73–82.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Guess PC, Stappert CF. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater. 2008;24:804–13.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Jansen K, van der Made SAM, Özcan M. Randomized clinical trial on indirect resin composite and ceramic laminate veneers: up to 10-year findings. J Dent. 2019;86:102–9.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Pahlevan A, Mirzaee M, Yassine E, Ranjbar Omrany L, Hasani Tabatabaee M, Kermanshah H, et al. Enamel thickness after preparation of tooth for porcelain laminate. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11:428–32.PubMed

26.

Brunton PA, Aminian A, Wilson NH. Tooth preparation techniques for porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J. 2000;189:260–2.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Gresnigt M, Ozcan M. Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth with porcelain laminates and sectional veneers. J Can Dent Assoc. 2011;77:b143.PubMed

28.

De Angelis F, D’Arcangelo C, Angelozzi R, Vadini M. Retrospective clinical evaluation of a no-prep porcelain veneer protocol [published online ahead of print, 2021 May 28]. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;S0022–3913(21):00226–2.

29.

Arif R, Dennison JB, Garcia D, Yaman P. Retrospective evaluation of the clinical performance and longevity of porcelain laminate veneers 7 to 14 years after cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(1):31–7.CrossRefPubMed

30.

D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D’Amario M. Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:1071–9.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Karagözoğlu İ, Toksavul S, Toman M. 3D quantification of clinical marginal and internal gap of porcelain laminate veneers with minimal and without tooth preparation and 2-year clinical evaluation. Quintessence Int. 2016;47:461–71.PubMed

32.

Granell-Ruíz M, Agustín-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, Román-Rodríguez JL, Solá-Ruíz MF. Influence of bruxism on survival of porcelain laminate veneers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:426–32.CrossRef

33.

Strazzi-Sahyon HB, Rocha EP, AssunÇÃo WG, Dos Santos PH. Role of adhesive systems on the luting interface’s thickness of ceramic laminate veneers. Braz Oral Res. 2020;2434:e063.CrossRef

34.

Lopes Cde C, Rodrigues RB, Silva AL, Simamoto Júnior PC, Soares CJ, Novais VR. Degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin cements cured through different all-ceramic systems. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(5):484–9.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Krishnaswamy NR, Sunitha C. Light-emitting diode vs halogen light curing of orthodontic brackets: a 15-month clinical study of bond failures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(4):518–23.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Attia YS, Sherif RM, Zaghloul HH. Survival of hybrid laminate veneers using two different tooth preparation techniques: randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent J. 2021;32(6):36–53.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Jain V, Das TK, Pruthi G, Shah N, Rajendiran S. Comparative evaluation of effects of bleaching on color stability and marginal adaptation of discolored direct and indirect composite laminate veneers under in vivo conditions. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15:46–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Mihali SG, Lolos D, Popa G, Tudor A, Bratu DC. Retrospective long-term clinical outcome of feldspathic ceramic veneers. Mater (Basel). 2022;15(6):2150.CrossRef

39.

Kumbuloglu O, Özcan M. Clinical survival of indirect, anterior 3-unit surface-retained fibre-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis: up to 7.5-years follow-up. J Dent. 2015;43:656–63.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Clinical survival of No-prep indirect composite laminate veneers: a 7-year prospective case series study
Authors: Ozge Kam Hepdeniz
Ugur Burak Temel
Publication date: 01-12-2023
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: Veneer
Published in: BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02949-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Clinical survival of No-prep indirect composite laminate veneers: a 7-year prospective case series study

Abstract

Background

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Detecting representative characteristics of different genders using intraoral photographs: a deep learning model with interpretation of gradient-weighted class activation mapping

Hematologic tests and their association with the severity of COVID-19 and periodontitis in hospitalized patients: a case–control study

Conservative endodontic microsurgery to protect critical anatomical structures–selective curettage: a case series

Neuromuscular and occlusion analysis to evaluate the efficacy of three splints on patients with bruxism

Photobiostimulation conjugated with stem cells or their secretome for temporomandibular joint arthritis in a rat model

The role of systemic statins in the inception and healing of apical periodontitis: a systematic review