Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Urogenital

Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting parametrial invasion in stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer

Authors: Jung Jae Park, Chan Kyo Kim, Sung Yoon Park, Byung Kwan Park, Bohyun Kim

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating parametrial invasion (PMI) in stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer.

Methods

A total of 117 patients with stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer who underwent preoperative MRI and radical hysterectomy were included in this study. Preoperative clinical variables and MRI variables were analysed and compared between the groups with and without pathologically proven PMI.

Results

All variables except age were significantly different between patients with and without pathologic PMI (P < 0.05). All variables except squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen were also significantly correlated with pathologic PMI on univariate analysis (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that PMI on MRI (P < 0.001) and tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (P = 0.029) were independent predictors of pathologic PMI. Area under the curve of PMI on MRI increased significantly from 0.793 to 0.872 when combined with tumour ADC (P = 0.002). When PMI on MRI was further stratified by tumour ADC, the false negative rate was 2.0 % (1/49).

Conclusion

In stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer, tumour ADC and PMI on MRI seem to be independent predictors of pathologic PMI. Combining the two predictors improved the diagnostic performance of identifying patients at low risk of pathologic PMI.

Key points

• Accurate PMI prediction is essential for appropriate treatment planning
• Tumour ADC appears to be an independent predictor of pathologic PMI
• Adding DWI to MRI improves accuracy for identifying low-risk patients for PMI
Literature
1.
go back to reference Delgado G, Bundy BN, Fowler WC Jr et al (1989) A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 35:314–320PubMedCrossRef Delgado G, Bundy BN, Fowler WC Jr et al (1989) A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 35:314–320PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Landoni F, Bocciolone L, Perego P, Maneo A, Bratina G, Mangioni C (1995) Cancer of the cervix, FIGO stages IB and IIA: patterns of local growth and paracervical extension. Int J Gynecol Cancer 5:329–334PubMed Landoni F, Bocciolone L, Perego P, Maneo A, Bratina G, Mangioni C (1995) Cancer of the cervix, FIGO stages IB and IIA: patterns of local growth and paracervical extension. Int J Gynecol Cancer 5:329–334PubMed
3.
go back to reference Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, Muzii L, Panici PB (2003) Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48:287–293PubMedCrossRef Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, Muzii L, Panici PB (2003) Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48:287–293PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R et al (2006) Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol 102:256–262PubMedCrossRef Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R et al (2006) Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol 102:256–262PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kodama J, Kusumoto T, Nakamura K, Seki N, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y (2011) Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol 122:491–494PubMedCrossRef Kodama J, Kusumoto T, Nakamura K, Seki N, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y (2011) Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol 122:491–494PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS (2012) A model for prediction of parametrial involvement and feasibility of less radical resection of parametrium in patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 126:82–86PubMedCrossRef Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS (2012) A model for prediction of parametrial involvement and feasibility of less radical resection of parametrium in patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 126:82–86PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gemer O, Eitan R, Gdalevich M et al (2013) Can parametrectomy be avoided in early cervical cancer? An algorithm for the identification of patients at low risk for parametrial involvement. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:76–80PubMedCrossRef Gemer O, Eitan R, Gdalevich M et al (2013) Can parametrectomy be avoided in early cervical cancer? An algorithm for the identification of patients at low risk for parametrial involvement. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:76–80PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Thomeer MG, Gerestein C, Spronk S, van Doorn HC, van der Ham E, Hunink MG (2013) Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 23:2005–2018PubMedCrossRef Thomeer MG, Gerestein C, Spronk S, van Doorn HC, van der Ham E, Hunink MG (2013) Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 23:2005–2018PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:107–108PubMedCrossRef Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:107–108PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wakefield JC, Downey K, Kyriazi S, deSouza NM (2013) New MR techniques in gynecologic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:249–260PubMedCrossRef Wakefield JC, Downey K, Kyriazi S, deSouza NM (2013) New MR techniques in gynecologic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:249–260PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thoeny HC, Forstner R, De Keyzer F (2012) Genitourinary applications of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the pelvis. Radiology 263:326–342PubMedCrossRef Thoeny HC, Forstner R, De Keyzer F (2012) Genitourinary applications of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the pelvis. Radiology 263:326–342PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nougaret S, Tirumani SH, Addley H, Pandey H, Sala E, Reinhold C (2013) Pearls and pitfalls in MRI of gynecologic malignancy with diffusion-weighted technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:261–276PubMedCrossRef Nougaret S, Tirumani SH, Addley H, Pandey H, Sala E, Reinhold C (2013) Pearls and pitfalls in MRI of gynecologic malignancy with diffusion-weighted technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:261–276PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA et al (2013) Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:314–320PubMedCrossRef Downey K, Riches SF, Morgan VA et al (2013) Relationship between imaging biomarkers of stage I cervical cancer and poor-prognosis histologic features: quantitative histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:314–320PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kuang F, Ren J, Zhong Q, Liyuan F, Huan Y, Chen Z (2013) The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 23:1050–1058PubMedCrossRef Kuang F, Ren J, Zhong Q, Liyuan F, Huan Y, Chen Z (2013) The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 23:1050–1058PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Payne GS, Schmidt M, Morgan VA et al (2010) Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:246–252PubMedCrossRef Payne GS, Schmidt M, Morgan VA et al (2010) Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:246–252PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jung DC, Kim MK, Kang S et al (2010) Identification of a patient group at low risk for parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 119:426–430PubMedCrossRef Jung DC, Kim MK, Kang S et al (2010) Identification of a patient group at low risk for parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 119:426–430PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kamimori T, Sakamoto K, Fujiwara K et al (2011) Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:349–354PubMed Kamimori T, Sakamoto K, Fujiwara K et al (2011) Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:349–354PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kim HS, Kim CK, Park BK, Huh SJ, Kim B (2013) Evaluation of therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:187–193PubMedCrossRef Kim HS, Kim CK, Park BK, Huh SJ, Kim B (2013) Evaluation of therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:187–193PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Choi SH, Kim SH, Choi HJ, Park BK, Lee HJ (2004) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:620–627PubMedCrossRef Choi SH, Kim SH, Choi HJ, Park BK, Lee HJ (2004) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:620–627PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, Chang YC, Winkler ML, Stern JL (1988) Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 166:623–631PubMed Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, Chang YC, Winkler ML, Stern JL (1988) Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 166:623–631PubMed
22.
go back to reference Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Scarfone G et al (1993) Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Radiology 188:797–801PubMed Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Scarfone G et al (1993) Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Radiology 188:797–801PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W et al (1996) Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging. Radiology 201:531–539PubMed Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W et al (1996) Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging. Radiology 201:531–539PubMed
24.
go back to reference Sheu M, Chang C, Wang J, Yen M (2001) MR staging of clinical stage I and IIa cervical carcinoma: a reappraisal of efficacy and pitfalls. Eur J Radiol 38:225–231PubMedCrossRef Sheu M, Chang C, Wang J, Yen M (2001) MR staging of clinical stage I and IIa cervical carcinoma: a reappraisal of efficacy and pitfalls. Eur J Radiol 38:225–231PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Harry VN (2010) Novel imaging techniques as response biomarkers in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:253–261PubMedCrossRef Harry VN (2010) Novel imaging techniques as response biomarkers in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:253–261PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15:71–78PubMedCrossRef Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15:71–78PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Chopra S, Verma A, Kundu S et al (2012) Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging as a predictive marker for tumor response in patients undergoing chemoradiation for postoperative recurrences of cervical cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 8:68–73PubMedCrossRef Chopra S, Verma A, Kundu S et al (2012) Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging as a predictive marker for tumor response in patients undergoing chemoradiation for postoperative recurrences of cervical cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 8:68–73PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Joja I, Nagasaka T et al (2012) The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 127:478–483PubMedCrossRef Nakamura K, Joja I, Nagasaka T et al (2012) The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 127:478–483PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Choi HJ, Kim SH, Seo SS et al (2006) MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W538–W543PubMedCrossRef Choi HJ, Kim SH, Seo SS et al (2006) MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W538–W543PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Choi EK, Kim JK, Choi HJ et al (2009) Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI. Eur Radiol 19:2024–2032PubMedCrossRef Choi EK, Kim JK, Choi HJ et al (2009) Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI. Eur Radiol 19:2024–2032PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting parametrial invasion in stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer
Authors
Jung Jae Park
Chan Kyo Kim
Sung Yoon Park
Byung Kwan Park
Bohyun Kim
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3109-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

European Radiology 5/2014 Go to the issue