Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009

01-02-2009 | Clinical Trial

Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study

Authors: Charles Coutant, Roman Rouzier, Eric Fondrinier, Frederic Marchal, François Guillemin, Nathalie Seince, Anabella Rodrigues, Emile Darai, Serge Uzan, Emmanuel Barranger

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard treatment for patients with sentinel node (SN) metastasis, but most of these patients have negative non-sentinel nodes (non-SN). We have developed a scoring system (the Tenon score) to help identify a subgroup of patients who have a low risk of having non-SN metastases and who may thus forgo ALND. Here we validated the Tenon score in an independent cohort of SN-positive patients. Patients and methods We tested the accuracy of the Tenon score for predicting non-SN status in a prospective multicenter study of 226 SN-positive breast cancer patients. We calculated the false-negative rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed and the areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated as a measure of discriminatory capacity. Results At least one non-SN was positive in 63 patients (27.9%). One hundred and twenty (53.1%) of the 226 patients had a Tenon score of 3.5 or less. Among these 120 patients, five had at least one positive non-SN. With a score cut-off of 3.5, the negative predictive value was 95.8% and the false-negative rate was 4.2%. Overall, the Tenon score accurately predicted non-SN status, with an AUC of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.77–0.88). Conclusion In this multicenter study of an independent patient population, the Tenon score was accurate and reproducible for predicting non-SN status in breast cancer patients. The simplicity and reliability of the variables on which the Tenon score is based may be an advantage over other scoring systems.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwartz GF, Giuliano AE, Veronesi U (2002) Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19–22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer 94:2542–2551PubMedCrossRef Schwartz GF, Giuliano AE, Veronesi U (2002) Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19–22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer 94:2542–2551PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7703–7720PubMedCrossRef Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7703–7720PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V et al (1997) Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 349:1864–1867PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V et al (1997) Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 349:1864–1867PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH (2006) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis. Cancer 106:4–16PubMedCrossRef Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH (2006) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis. Cancer 106:4–16PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chu KU, Turner RR, Hansen NM et al (1999) Sentinel node metastasis in patients with breast carcinoma accurately predicts immunohistochemically detectable nonsentinel node metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 6:756–761PubMedCrossRef Chu KU, Turner RR, Hansen NM et al (1999) Sentinel node metastasis in patients with breast carcinoma accurately predicts immunohistochemically detectable nonsentinel node metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 6:756–761PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chu KU, Turner RR, Hansen NM et al (1999) Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection? Ann Surg 229:536–541PubMedCrossRef Chu KU, Turner RR, Hansen NM et al (1999) Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection? Ann Surg 229:536–541PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kamath VJ, Giuliano R, Dauway EL et al (2001) Characteristics of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer predict further involvement of higher-echelon nodes in the axilla: a study to evaluate the need for complete axillary lymph node dissection. Arch Surg 136:688–692PubMedCrossRef Kamath VJ, Giuliano R, Dauway EL et al (2001) Characteristics of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer predict further involvement of higher-echelon nodes in the axilla: a study to evaluate the need for complete axillary lymph node dissection. Arch Surg 136:688–692PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sachdev U, Murphy K, Derzie A et al (2002) Predictors of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 183:213–217PubMedCrossRef Sachdev U, Murphy K, Derzie A et al (2002) Predictors of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 183:213–217PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hwang RF, Krishnamurthy S, Hunt KK et al (2003) Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:248–254PubMedCrossRef Hwang RF, Krishnamurthy S, Hunt KK et al (2003) Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:248–254PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nos C, Harding-MacKean C, Freneaux P et al (2003) Prediction of tumour involvement in remaining axillary lymph nodes when the sentinel node in a woman with breast cancer contains metastases. Br J Surg 90:1354–1360PubMedCrossRef Nos C, Harding-MacKean C, Freneaux P et al (2003) Prediction of tumour involvement in remaining axillary lymph nodes when the sentinel node in a woman with breast cancer contains metastases. Br J Surg 90:1354–1360PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Barranger E, Coutant C, Flahault A et al (2005) An axilla scoring system to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement. Breast Cancer Res Treat 91:113–119PubMedCrossRef Barranger E, Coutant C, Flahault A et al (2005) An axilla scoring system to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement. Breast Cancer Res Treat 91:113–119PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Predicting the status of the nonsentinel axillary nodes: a multicenter study. Arch Surg 136:563–568PubMedCrossRef Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Predicting the status of the nonsentinel axillary nodes: a multicenter study. Arch Surg 136:563–568PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL et al (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1140–1151PubMedCrossRef Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL et al (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1140–1151PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G et al (2005) Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 190:543–550PubMedCrossRef Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G et al (2005) Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg 190:543–550PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Viale G, Maiorano E, Pruneri G et al (2005) Predicting the risk for additional axillary metastases in patients with breast carcinoma and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg 241:319–325PubMedCrossRef Viale G, Maiorano E, Pruneri G et al (2005) Predicting the risk for additional axillary metastases in patients with breast carcinoma and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg 241:319–325PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Krauth JS, Charitansky H, Isaac S, Bobin JY (2006) Clinical implications of axillary sentinel lymph node ‘micrometastases’ in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:400–404PubMedCrossRef Krauth JS, Charitansky H, Isaac S, Bobin JY (2006) Clinical implications of axillary sentinel lymph node ‘micrometastases’ in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:400–404PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Saidi RF, Dudrick PS, Remine SG, Mittal VK (2004) Nonsentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer. Am Surg 70:101–105; discussion 105PubMed Saidi RF, Dudrick PS, Remine SG, Mittal VK (2004) Nonsentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer. Am Surg 70:101–105; discussion 105PubMed
18.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed
19.
go back to reference Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Fey JV et al (2007) Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation. J Clin Oncol 25:3670–3679PubMedCrossRef Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Fey JV et al (2007) Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation. J Clin Oncol 25:3670–3679PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Mariani L et al (2007) Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. Am J Surg 193:686–692PubMedCrossRef Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Mariani L et al (2007) Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. Am J Surg 193:686–692PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Soni NK, Carmalt HL, Gillett DJ, Spillane AJ (2005) Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:958–964PubMedCrossRef Soni NK, Carmalt HL, Gillett DJ, Spillane AJ (2005) Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:958–964PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dauphine CE, Haukoos JS, Vargas MP et al (2007) Evaluation of three scoring systems predicting non-sentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1014–1019PubMedCrossRef Dauphine CE, Haukoos JS, Vargas MP et al (2007) Evaluation of three scoring systems predicting non-sentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1014–1019PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kocsis L, Svebis M, Boross G et al (2004) Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am Surg 70:1019–1024PubMed Kocsis L, Svebis M, Boross G et al (2004) Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am Surg 70:1019–1024PubMed
24.
go back to reference Smidt ML, Kuster DM, van der Wilt GJ et al (2005) Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands? Ann Surg Oncol 12:1066–1072PubMedCrossRef Smidt ML, Kuster DM, van der Wilt GJ et al (2005) Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands? Ann Surg Oncol 12:1066–1072PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lambert LA, Ayers GD, Hwang RF et al (2006) Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:310–320PubMedCrossRef Lambert LA, Ayers GD, Hwang RF et al (2006) Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:310–320PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cripe MH, Beran LC, Liang WC, Sickle-Santanello BJ (2006) The likelihood of additional nodal disease following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: validation of a nomogram. Am J Surg 192:484–487PubMedCrossRef Cripe MH, Beran LC, Liang WC, Sickle-Santanello BJ (2006) The likelihood of additional nodal disease following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: validation of a nomogram. Am J Surg 192:484–487PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Alran S, De Rycke Y, Fourchotte V et al (2007) Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2195–2201PubMedCrossRef Alran S, De Rycke Y, Fourchotte V et al (2007) Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2195–2201PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Specht MC, Kattan MW, Gonen M et al (2005) Predicting nonsentinel node status after positive sentinel lymph biopsy for breast cancer: clinicians versus nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol 12:654–659PubMedCrossRef Specht MC, Kattan MW, Gonen M et al (2005) Predicting nonsentinel node status after positive sentinel lymph biopsy for breast cancer: clinicians versus nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol 12:654–659PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Simon R (2005) Roadmap for developing and validating therapeutically relevant genomic classifiers. J Clin Oncol 23:7332–7341PubMedCrossRef Simon R (2005) Roadmap for developing and validating therapeutically relevant genomic classifiers. J Clin Oncol 23:7332–7341PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study
Authors
Charles Coutant
Roman Rouzier
Eric Fondrinier
Frederic Marchal
François Guillemin
Nathalie Seince
Anabella Rodrigues
Emile Darai
Serge Uzan
Emmanuel Barranger
Publication date
01-02-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9967-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine