Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2005

Open Access 01-12-2005 | Methodology

Validating a work group climate assessment tool for improving the performance of public health organizations

Authors: Cary Perry, Nancy LeMay, Greg Rodway, Allison Tracy, Joan Galer

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This article describes the validation of an instrument to measure work group climate in public health organizations in developing countries. The instrument, the Work Group Climate Assessment Tool (WCA), was applied in Brazil, Mozambique, and Guinea to assess the intermediate outcomes of a program to develop leadership for performance improvement. Data were collected from 305 individuals in 42 work groups, who completed a self-administered questionnaire.

Methods

The WCA was initially validated using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and exploratory factor analysis. This article presents the results of a second validation study to refine the initial analyses to account for nested data, to provide item-level psychometrics, and to establish construct validity. Analyses included eigenvalue decomposition analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and validity and reliability analyses.

Results

This study confirmed the validity and reliability of the WCA across work groups with different demographic characteristics (gender, education, management level, and geographical location). The study showed that there is agreement between the theoretical construct of work climate and the items in the WCA tool across different populations. The WCA captures a single perception of climate rather than individual sub-scales of clarity, support, and challenge.

Conclusion

The WCA is useful for comparing the climates of different work groups, tracking the changes in climate in a single work group over time, or examining differences among individuals' perceptions of their work group climate. Application of the WCA before and after a leadership development process can help work groups hold a discussion about current climate and select a target for improvement. The WCA provides work groups with a tool to take ownership of their own group climate through a process that is simple and objective and that protects individual confidentiality.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goleman D: Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review. 2000, 78-90. Goleman D: Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review. 2000, 78-90.
2.
go back to reference Stringer R: Leadership and Organizational Climate. 2002, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall Stringer R: Leadership and Organizational Climate. 2002, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall
3.
go back to reference Denison D: What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate?: A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review. 1996, 21: 619ff- Denison D: What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate?: A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review. 1996, 21: 619ff-
4.
go back to reference Burke W: Organizational Development: A Process of Learning and Changing. 1993, Reading, Addison-Wesley Burke W: Organizational Development: A Process of Learning and Changing. 1993, Reading, Addison-Wesley
5.
go back to reference Goodstein L, Burke W: Creating successful organizational change. Organizational Dynamics. 1991, 19: 5-17. 10.1016/0090-2616(91)90050-J.CrossRef Goodstein L, Burke W: Creating successful organizational change. Organizational Dynamics. 1991, 19: 5-17. 10.1016/0090-2616(91)90050-J.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tagiuri R: The concept of organizational climate. Organizational Climate: Explorations of a Concept. Edited by: Tagiuri R, Litwin GH. 1968, Cambridge, Harvard University Tagiuri R: The concept of organizational climate. Organizational Climate: Explorations of a Concept. Edited by: Tagiuri R, Litwin GH. 1968, Cambridge, Harvard University
7.
go back to reference Litwin G, Stringer R: Motivation and Organizational Climate. 1968, Boston, Harvard University Press Litwin G, Stringer R: Motivation and Organizational Climate. 1968, Boston, Harvard University Press
8.
go back to reference Laschinger H, Finegan J, Shamian J: The impact of workplace empowerment, organizational trust on staff nurses' work satisfaction and organizational commitment. Health Care Manage Rev. 2001, 26: 7-23.CrossRefPubMed Laschinger H, Finegan J, Shamian J: The impact of workplace empowerment, organizational trust on staff nurses' work satisfaction and organizational commitment. Health Care Manage Rev. 2001, 26: 7-23.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Marín JM, Melgar A, Castaño C: PAHO Organizational Climate Instrument. Teoría y Técnicas de Desarrollo Organizacional [Theories and Techniques of Organizational Development]. Technical Documents Series no. PSDCG-T-10. 1990, Proyecto Subregional de Desarrollo de la Capacidad Gerencial de los Servicios de Salud de Centroamérica y Panamá. Guatemala: Pan American Health Organization, 3: Marín JM, Melgar A, Castaño C: PAHO Organizational Climate Instrument. Teoría y Técnicas de Desarrollo Organizacional [Theories and Techniques of Organizational Development]. Technical Documents Series no. PSDCG-T-10. 1990, Proyecto Subregional de Desarrollo de la Capacidad Gerencial de los Servicios de Salud de Centroamérica y Panamá. Guatemala: Pan American Health Organization, 3:
11.
go back to reference The Gallup Organization: Gallup Q12. Edited by: Princeton NJ. 1999, The Gallup Organization The Gallup Organization: Gallup Q12. Edited by: Princeton NJ. 1999, The Gallup Organization
12.
go back to reference Management Sciences for Health: Creating a climate that motivates staff and improves performance. The Manager. 11: 1-22. Management Sciences for Health: Creating a climate that motivates staff and improves performance. The Manager. 11: 1-22.
13.
go back to reference Schafer JL: Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. 1997, London, Chapman & HallCrossRef Schafer JL: Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. 1997, London, Chapman & HallCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gorsuch RL: Factor Analysis. 1983, London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2 Gorsuch RL: Factor Analysis. 1983, London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2
Metadata
Title
Validating a work group climate assessment tool for improving the performance of public health organizations
Authors
Cary Perry
Nancy LeMay
Greg Rodway
Allison Tracy
Joan Galer
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2005
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-3-10

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Human Resources for Health 1/2005 Go to the issue