Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2005

Open Access 01-12-2005 | Research

Iranian staff nurses' views of their productivity and human resource factors improving and impeding it: a qualitative study

Authors: Nahid Dehghan Nayeri, Ali Akbar Nazari, Mahvash Salsali, Fazlollah Ahmadi

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nurses, as the largest human resource element of health care systems, have a major role in providing ongoing, high-quality care to patients. Productivity is a significant indicator of professional development within any professional group, including nurses. The human resource element has been identified as the most important factor affecting productivity. This research aimed to explore nurses' perceptions and experiences of productivity and human resource factors improving or impeding it.

Method

A qualitative approach was used to obtain rich data; open, semi-structured interviews were also conducted. The sampling was based on the maximum variant approach; data analysis was carried out by content analysis, with the constant comparative method.

Results

Participants indicated that human resources issues are the most important factor in promoting or impeding their productivity. They suggested that the factors influencing effectiveness of human resource elements include: systematic evaluation of staff numbers; a sound selection process based on verifiable criteria; provision of an adequate staffing level throughout the year; full involvement of the ward sister in the process of admitting patients; and sound communication within the care team. Paying attention to these factors creates a suitable background for improved productivity and decreases negative impacts of human resource shortages, whereas ignoring or interfering with them would result in lowering of nurses' productivity.

Conclusion

Participants maintained that satisfactory human resources can improve nurses' productivity and the quality of care they provide; thereby fulfilling the core objective of the health care system.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Eastaugh SR: Hospital Nurse Productivity. Journal of Health Care Finance. 2002, 29 (1): 14-22.PubMed Eastaugh SR: Hospital Nurse Productivity. Journal of Health Care Finance. 2002, 29 (1): 14-22.PubMed
2.
go back to reference F Helmer TSJD: Pictures of Performance: The Key to Improved Nursing Productivity. Health Care Management Review. 1988, 13 (4): 65-70. F Helmer TSJD: Pictures of Performance: The Key to Improved Nursing Productivity. Health Care Management Review. 1988, 13 (4): 65-70.
3.
go back to reference Hall LM: Nursing Intellectual Capital: A Theoretical Approach for Analysing Nursing Productivity. Nursing Economics. 2003, 21 (1): 14-19.PubMed Hall LM: Nursing Intellectual Capital: A Theoretical Approach for Analysing Nursing Productivity. Nursing Economics. 2003, 21 (1): 14-19.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Houser J: A Model for Evaluating the Context of Nursing Care Delivery. he Journal of Nursing Administration (JONA). 2003, 33 (1): 39-47. 10.1097/00005110-200301000-00008.CrossRef Houser J: A Model for Evaluating the Context of Nursing Care Delivery. he Journal of Nursing Administration (JONA). 2003, 33 (1): 39-47. 10.1097/00005110-200301000-00008.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mc-Neese-Smith DK: Staff Nurse View of Their Productivity and Nonproductivity. Health care Management Review. 2001, 26 (2): 7-19.CrossRef Mc-Neese-Smith DK: Staff Nurse View of Their Productivity and Nonproductivity. Health care Management Review. 2001, 26 (2): 7-19.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference BR Holcomb NHMF: Nursing Theory and Concept Development or Analysis, Defining and Measuring Nursing Productivity: A Concept Analysis and Pilot Study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002, 38 (4): 378-386. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02200.x.CrossRef BR Holcomb NHMF: Nursing Theory and Concept Development or Analysis, Defining and Measuring Nursing Productivity: A Concept Analysis and Pilot Study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002, 38 (4): 378-386. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02200.x.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Moody RC: Nurse Productivity Measures for the 21st Century. Health Care Management Review. 2004, 29 (2 ): 98-106.CrossRefPubMed Moody RC: Nurse Productivity Measures for the 21st Century. Health Care Management Review. 2004, 29 (2 ): 98-106.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference J W Williamson JJ: Understanding, Evaluating and Improving Productivity Nursing. Nursing Management. 1988, 19 (5): 49-52. J W Williamson JJ: Understanding, Evaluating and Improving Productivity Nursing. Nursing Management. 1988, 19 (5): 49-52.
9.
go back to reference K Beverley BK: Manage productivity with HPPD. Nursing Management. 2003, 34 (1): 47-CrossRef K Beverley BK: Manage productivity with HPPD. Nursing Management. 2003, 34 (1): 47-CrossRef
10.
go back to reference O Vincent NR: Measuring Productivity: Outcome versuss Output. Nursing Management. 1989, 20 (4): O Vincent NR: Measuring Productivity: Outcome versuss Output. Nursing Management. 1989, 20 (4):
11.
go back to reference Curtin LL: Nursing Productivity from Data to Definition. Nursing Management. 1995, 26 (4): 25-32.PubMed Curtin LL: Nursing Productivity from Data to Definition. Nursing Management. 1995, 26 (4): 25-32.PubMed
12.
go back to reference P Varca MJV: The Relationship of Ability and Satisfaction to Job Performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 1993, 42: 265-275.CrossRef P Varca MJV: The Relationship of Ability and Satisfaction to Job Performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 1993, 42: 265-275.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Daley D: Productivity Tools and Employee Incentives: Availability and Associations among North Carolina Municipalities. Public Productivity & Management Review. 1993, 17: 161-171.CrossRef Daley D: Productivity Tools and Employee Incentives: Availability and Associations among North Carolina Municipalities. Public Productivity & Management Review. 1993, 17: 161-171.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bartel AP: Productivity Gains from the Implementation of Employee Training Programs. Industrial Relations. 1994, 33 : 411-425. Bartel AP: Productivity Gains from the Implementation of Employee Training Programs. Industrial Relations. 1994, 33 : 411-425.
15.
go back to reference JC McCloskey BMC: Variables Related to Job Performance. Image. 1988, 20: 203-207. JC McCloskey BMC: Variables Related to Job Performance. Image. 1988, 20: 203-207.
16.
go back to reference McNeese-Smith DK: Increasing Employee Productivity, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment. Hospital and Health Services Administration. 1996, 41: 160-175.PubMed McNeese-Smith DK: Increasing Employee Productivity, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment. Hospital and Health Services Administration. 1996, 41: 160-175.PubMed
17.
go back to reference McNeese-Smith DK: Job Satisfaction, Productivity, and Organizational Commitment. Journal of Nursing Administration. 1995, 25 (9): 17-26.CrossRefPubMed McNeese-Smith DK: Job Satisfaction, Productivity, and Organizational Commitment. Journal of Nursing Administration. 1995, 25 (9): 17-26.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference S Grosskopf DMVV: The eFFects of teaching on hospital productivity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2001, 35: 189-204. 10.1016/S0038-0121(01)00006-4.CrossRef S Grosskopf DMVV: The eFFects of teaching on hospital productivity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2001, 35: 189-204. 10.1016/S0038-0121(01)00006-4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference A Strauss JC: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 1994, Newbury Park , Sage Publications A Strauss JC: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 1994, Newbury Park , Sage Publications
20.
go back to reference writing guides content analysis. http://writingcolostateedu/indexcfm. writing guides content analysis. http://​writingcolostate​edu/​indexcfm.​
21.
go back to reference J Rugkasa BKJS: Anxious Adults vs. Cool Children: Children’s Views on Smoking and Addiction. Soc Sci Med. 2001, 53: 593-602. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00367-1.CrossRefPubMed J Rugkasa BKJS: Anxious Adults vs. Cool Children: Children’s Views on Smoking and Addiction. Soc Sci Med. 2001, 53: 593-602. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00367-1.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference D F Polit CTBBPH: Essentials of Nursing Research. 2001, philadephia , Lippincott Company, 5, D F Polit CTBBPH: Essentials of Nursing Research. 2001, philadephia , Lippincott Company, 5,
23.
go back to reference R C Swansburg RJS: Introductory Management and Leadership For Nurses . 2000, Boston , Jones and Bartlett Publisher, 2 R C Swansburg RJS: Introductory Management and Leadership For Nurses . 2000, Boston , Jones and Bartlett Publisher, 2
24.
go back to reference Nursing Professional Advisory Working Group of the JPPC: MIS: Nursing Resource Consumption. 1997 Nursing Professional Advisory Working Group of the JPPC: MIS: Nursing Resource Consumption. 1997
25.
go back to reference S D Jordan: Nursing Productivity in Rural Hospital. Nursing Management. 1994, 25 (3): 58-62. S D Jordan: Nursing Productivity in Rural Hospital. Nursing Management. 1994, 25 (3): 58-62.
26.
go back to reference J R Bloom JAAANB: Nurse Staffing Patterns and Hospital Efficiency In The United States. SocSci Med. 1997, 44 (2): 147-155. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00063-9.CrossRef J R Bloom JAAANB: Nurse Staffing Patterns and Hospital Efficiency In The United States. SocSci Med. 1997, 44 (2): 147-155. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00063-9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Quality compensation incentives work when system fosters quality. Health Care Strategic Management. 2001, 19 (8): 15- Quality compensation incentives work when system fosters quality. Health Care Strategic Management. 2001, 19 (8): 15-
28.
go back to reference Huber D: Leadership and Nursing Care Management. 2000, Philadelphia , Saunders Company, 2 Huber D: Leadership and Nursing Care Management. 2000, Philadelphia , Saunders Company, 2
29.
go back to reference L M Hall DDISRS: A Study of the Impact of Nursing Staff Mix Models and Organizational Change Strategies on Patient, System and Nurse Outcomes. 2001, University of Toronto,Faculty of Nursing L M Hall DDISRS: A Study of the Impact of Nursing Staff Mix Models and Organizational Change Strategies on Patient, System and Nurse Outcomes. 2001, University of Toronto,Faculty of Nursing
30.
go back to reference Walker DA: Bottom-Line Approach to Nurse Staffing. Nursing Management. 1996, 27: 31-32.PubMed Walker DA: Bottom-Line Approach to Nurse Staffing. Nursing Management. 1996, 27: 31-32.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Iranian staff nurses' views of their productivity and human resource factors improving and impeding it: a qualitative study
Authors
Nahid Dehghan Nayeri
Ali Akbar Nazari
Mahvash Salsali
Fazlollah Ahmadi
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2005
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-3-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Human Resources for Health 1/2005 Go to the issue