Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2009

01-01-2009

Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment

Authors: Dimitrios Katsavelis, Ka-Chun Siu, Bernadette Brown-Clerk, Irene H. Lee, Yong Kwon Lee, Dmitry Oleynikov, Nick Stergiou

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A robotic virtual-reality (VR) simulator has been developed to improve robot-assisted training for laparoscopic surgery and to enhance surgical performance in laparoscopic skills. The simulated VR training environment provides an effective approach to evaluate and improve surgical performance. This study presents our findings of the VR training environment for robotic laparoscopy.

Methods

Eight volunteers performed two inanimate tasks in both the VR and the actual training environment. The tasks were bimanual carrying (BC) and needle passing (NP). For the BC task, the volunteers simultaneously transferred two plastic pieces in opposite directions five times consecutively. The same volunteers passed a surgical needle through six pairs of holes in the NP task. Both tasks require significant bimanual coordination that mimics actual laparoscopic skills. Data analysis included time to task completion, speed and distance traveled of the instrument tip, as well as range of motion of the subject’s wrist and elbow of the right arm. Electromyography of the right wrist flexor and extensor were also analyzed. Paired t-tests and Pearson’s r were used to explore the differences and correlations between the two environments.

Results

There were no significant differences between the actual and the simulated VR environment with respect to the BC task, while there were significant differences in almost all dependent parameters for the NP task. Moderate to high correlations for most dependent parameters were revealed for both tasks.

Conclusions

Our data shows that the VR environment adequately simulated the BC task. The significant differences found for the NP task may be attributed to an oversimplification in the VR environment. However, they do point to the need for improvements in the complexity of our VR simulation. Further research work is needed to develop effective and reliable VR environments for robotic laparoscopic training.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Satava RM, Bowersox JC, Mack M, Krummel TM (2001) Robotic surgery: state of the art and future trends. Contemp Surg 57:489–499 Satava RM, Bowersox JC, Mack M, Krummel TM (2001) Robotic surgery: state of the art and future trends. Contemp Surg 57:489–499
3.
go back to reference Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:790–795PubMed Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:790–795PubMed
4.
go back to reference Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN (2003) Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 17:1744–1748PubMedCrossRef Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN (2003) Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 17:1744–1748PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference De Ugarte DA, Etzioni DA, Gracia C, Atkinson JB (2003) Roboticsurgery an resident training. Surg Endosc 17:960–963PubMedCrossRef De Ugarte DA, Etzioni DA, Gracia C, Atkinson JB (2003) Roboticsurgery an resident training. Surg Endosc 17:960–963PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18:372–378PubMedCrossRef Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18:372–378PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Schemmer P, Buchler MW (2004) Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 91:1390 –1397PubMedCrossRef Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Schemmer P, Buchler MW (2004) Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 91:1390 –1397PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, Talamini MA, Hacker SO, Howard RS, Schenkman NS (2004) Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the da Vinci surgical system. Am J Surg 187:309–315PubMedCrossRef Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, Talamini MA, Hacker SO, Howard RS, Schenkman NS (2004) Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the da Vinci surgical system. Am J Surg 187:309–315PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Donias HW, Karamanoukian RL, Glick PL, Bergsland J, Karamanoukian HL (2002) Survey of resident training in robotic surgery. Am Surg 68:177–181PubMed Donias HW, Karamanoukian RL, Glick PL, Bergsland J, Karamanoukian HL (2002) Survey of resident training in robotic surgery. Am Surg 68:177–181PubMed
10.
go back to reference Guru KA, Kuvshinoff BW, Pavlov-Shapiro S, Bienko MB, Aftab MN, Brady WE, Mohler JL (2007) Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: a comparative study. J Am Coll Surg 204:96–101PubMedCrossRef Guru KA, Kuvshinoff BW, Pavlov-Shapiro S, Bienko MB, Aftab MN, Brady WE, Mohler JL (2007) Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: a comparative study. J Am Coll Surg 204:96–101PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:790–795PubMed Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:790–795PubMed
12.
go back to reference Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Peabody J, Menon M (2004) Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 18:63–67PubMedCrossRef Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Peabody J, Menon M (2004) Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 18:63–67PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A, Kashfi A, Kienle P, Konstantinides L, Ahmadi MR, Fonouni H, Schemmer P, Friess H, Gebhard MM, Buchler MW, Schmidt J, Gutt CN (2006) Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc 20:1376–1382PubMedCrossRef Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A, Kashfi A, Kienle P, Konstantinides L, Ahmadi MR, Fonouni H, Schemmer P, Friess H, Gebhard MM, Buchler MW, Schmidt J, Gutt CN (2006) Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc 20:1376–1382PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hanly EJ, Zand J, Bachman SL, Marohn MR, Talamini MA (2005) Value of SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology. Surg Endosc 19:477–483PubMedCrossRef Hanly EJ, Zand J, Bachman SL, Marohn MR, Talamini MA (2005) Value of SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology. Surg Endosc 19:477–483PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dohi T (2004) The overview of robot surgery. Nippon Rinsho 62:824–830PubMed Dohi T (2004) The overview of robot surgery. Nippon Rinsho 62:824–830PubMed
16.
go back to reference Weiss H, Ortmaier T, Maass H, Hirzinger G, Kuehnapfel U (2003) A virtual-reality-based haptic surgical training system. Comput Aided Surg 8:269–272PubMedCrossRef Weiss H, Ortmaier T, Maass H, Hirzinger G, Kuehnapfel U (2003) A virtual-reality-based haptic surgical training system. Comput Aided Surg 8:269–272PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kypson A, Nifong LW, Chitwood Jr WR (2004) Robot-assisted surgery: training and re-training surgeons. Int J Med Robot 1:70–76PubMed Kypson A, Nifong LW, Chitwood Jr WR (2004) Robot-assisted surgery: training and re-training surgeons. Int J Med Robot 1:70–76PubMed
18.
go back to reference Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N (2006) Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. Surg Endosc 20:96–103PubMedCrossRef Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N (2006) Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. Surg Endosc 20:96–103PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Judkins T, Oleynikov D, Narazaki K, Stergiou N (2006) Robotic surgery and training: electromyographic correlates of robotic laparoscopic training. Surg Endosc 20:824–829PubMedCrossRef Judkins T, Oleynikov D, Narazaki K, Stergiou N (2006) Robotic surgery and training: electromyographic correlates of robotic laparoscopic training. Surg Endosc 20:824–829PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive, their functions revealed by electromyography. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive, their functions revealed by electromyography. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD
21.
go back to reference Bonato P, Roy SH, Knaflitz M, Luca CJD (2001) Time-frequency parameters of the surface myoelectric signal for assessing muscle fatigue during cyclic dynamic contractions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:745–753PubMedCrossRef Bonato P, Roy SH, Knaflitz M, Luca CJD (2001) Time-frequency parameters of the surface myoelectric signal for assessing muscle fatigue during cyclic dynamic contractions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:745–753PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Scheidegger D, Oertli D (2006) Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 20:1286–1290PubMedCrossRef Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Scheidegger D, Oertli D (2006) Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 20:1286–1290PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185:146–149PubMedCrossRef Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185:146–149PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, Cakmak HK, Kuehnapfel UG, Germer CT, Bretthauer G, Buhr HJ (2005) A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 241:442–449PubMedCrossRef Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, Cakmak HK, Kuehnapfel UG, Germer CT, Bretthauer G, Buhr HJ (2005) A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 241:442–449PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment
Authors
Dimitrios Katsavelis
Ka-Chun Siu
Bernadette Brown-Clerk
Irene H. Lee
Yong Kwon Lee
Dmitry Oleynikov
Nick Stergiou
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9894-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2009 Go to the issue