Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Original Article

Utility of Repeated Abdominal CT Scans After Prior Negative CT Scans in Patients Presenting to ER with Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain

Authors: Borko Nojkov, Michael C. Duffy, Mitchell S. Cappell

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze diagnostic yield of repeat computed tomography (CT) after negative initial CT versus yield of initial CT in patients presenting repeatedly to emergency room (ER) for nontraumatic abdominal pain. Medical costs and radiation exposure from repeat CT could be reduced if repeat CT after negative initial CT has a low diagnostic yield.

Methods

Patients included consecutive adults presenting to William Beaumont Hospital, from 2007 to 2010, undergoing abdominal CT for nontraumatic abdominal pain retrospectively identified by medical diagnostic and CT procedural codes. Exclusion criteria were prior abdominal trauma, recent abdominal surgery, and known chronic gastrointestinal disease. The CT was labeled “positive” if findings explained patient’s abdominal pain or was clinically significant. Positivity rate was compared for repeat versus initial CT.

Results

Among 200 consecutive patients undergoing (659) multiple CTs (mean age = 45.7 years, 74 % female), positivity rate for initial CT (22.5 %) was significantly higher than positivity rates for CT#2 (8.4 %, p = 0.002), for CT#3 (4.9 %, p = 0.005), and for CT ≥ #4 (5.9 %, p = 0.006). Generally, CT positivity rate declined with increasing number of prior negative CTs. CT positivity rate was significantly higher in 100 patients undergoing single CT versus 155 patients undergoing repeat CTs (46.5 vs. 6.5 %, p = 0.0001). Positive repeat CT findings included intestinal mural thickening/mass (7), colitis (5), appendicitis (4), and other (14). Among 15 analyzed clinical parameters, two significantly predicted repeat CT positivity, namely, leukocytosis (p = 0.03) and APACHE-II-score >5 (p = 0.01). Repeat CTs constituted 47 % of all CTs.

Conclusions

Repeat abdominal CT after initially negative CT(s) performed for nontraumatic abdominal pain has a low diagnostic yield. Leukocytosis and APACHE-II score might help predict CT scan positivity. Data suggest restricted abdominal CT utilization in ER patients with multiple prior negative CTs. Findings warrant confirmation in prospective studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dunnick NR, Applegate KE, Arenson RL. The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:401–406.PubMedCrossRef Dunnick NR, Applegate KE, Arenson RL. The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:401–406.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, et al. Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologist and nonradiologist physicians. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:744–747.PubMedCrossRef Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, et al. Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologist and nonradiologist physicians. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:744–747.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sturman MF. Medical imaging in acute abdominal pain. Compr Ther. 1991;17:15–21.PubMed Sturman MF. Medical imaging in acute abdominal pain. Compr Ther. 1991;17:15–21.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA. 2005;293:2609–2617.PubMedCrossRef Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA. 2005;293:2609–2617.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Modahl L, Digumarthy SR, Rhea JT, et al. Emergency department abdominal computed tomography for nontraumatic abdominal pain: optimizing utilization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:860–866.PubMedCrossRef Modahl L, Digumarthy SR, Rhea JT, et al. Emergency department abdominal computed tomography for nontraumatic abdominal pain: optimizing utilization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:860–866.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–829.PubMedCrossRef Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–829.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1981. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1981.
10.
go back to reference Broder J, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol. 2006;13:25–30.PubMedCrossRef Broder J, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol. 2006;13:25–30.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nagurney JT, Brown DF, Chang Y, Sane S, Wang AC, Weiner JB. Use of diagnostic testing in the emergency department for patients presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain. J Emerg Med. 2003;25:363–371.PubMedCrossRef Nagurney JT, Brown DF, Chang Y, Sane S, Wang AC, Weiner JB. Use of diagnostic testing in the emergency department for patients presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain. J Emerg Med. 2003;25:363–371.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marincek B. Nontraumatic abdominal emergencies: acute abdominal pain: diagnostic strategies. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2136–2150.PubMed Marincek B. Nontraumatic abdominal emergencies: acute abdominal pain: diagnostic strategies. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2136–2150.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Rosen MP, Siewert B, Sands DZ, Bromberg R, Edlow J, Raptopoulos V. Value of abdominal CT in the emergency department for patients with abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:418–424.PubMed Rosen MP, Siewert B, Sands DZ, Bromberg R, Edlow J, Raptopoulos V. Value of abdominal CT in the emergency department for patients with abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:418–424.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Sala E, Watson CJ, Beadsmoore C, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of routine early abdominal computed tomography in patients presenting with non-specific acute abdominal pain. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:961–969.PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Watson CJ, Beadsmoore C, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of routine early abdominal computed tomography in patients presenting with non-specific acute abdominal pain. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:961–969.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tsushima Y, Yamada S, Aoki J, et al. Effect of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in adults. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:507–513.PubMedCrossRef Tsushima Y, Yamada S, Aoki J, et al. Effect of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in adults. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:507–513.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, McMahon PM, et al. Abdominopelvic CT increases diagnostic certainty and guides management decisions: a prospective investigation of 584 patients in a large academic medical center. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:238–243.PubMedCrossRef Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, McMahon PM, et al. Abdominopelvic CT increases diagnostic certainty and guides management decisions: a prospective investigation of 584 patients in a large academic medical center. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:238–243.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:141–146.PubMedCrossRef Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:141–146.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Scheinfeld MH, Mahadevia S, Stein EG, et al. Can lab data be used to reduce abdominal computed tomography (CT) usage in young adults presenting to the emergency department with nontraumatic abdominal pain? Emerg Radiol. 2010;17:353–360.PubMedCrossRef Scheinfeld MH, Mahadevia S, Stein EG, et al. Can lab data be used to reduce abdominal computed tomography (CT) usage in young adults presenting to the emergency department with nontraumatic abdominal pain? Emerg Radiol. 2010;17:353–360.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference van Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of the ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1535–1545.PubMedCrossRef van Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of the ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1535–1545.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lameris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, et al. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy of study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2431.PubMedCrossRef Lameris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, et al. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy of study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2431.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, et al. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009;253:31–46.PubMedCrossRef Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, et al. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009;253:31–46.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Anonymous. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. Anonymous. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332.
23.
go back to reference Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:887–892.PubMedCrossRef Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:887–892.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Desmond AN, McWilliams S, Maher MM, et al. Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging among patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:259–265.PubMedCrossRef Desmond AN, McWilliams S, Maher MM, et al. Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging among patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:259–265.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Craig O, O’Neill S, O’Neill F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography using lower doses of radiation for patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:886–892.PubMedCrossRef Craig O, O’Neill S, O’Neill F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography using lower doses of radiation for patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:886–892.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Singh AK, Desai H, Novelline RA. Emergency MRI of acute pelvic pain: MR protocol with no oral contrast. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16:133–141.PubMedCrossRef Singh AK, Desai H, Novelline RA. Emergency MRI of acute pelvic pain: MR protocol with no oral contrast. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16:133–141.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Heverhagen JT, Klose KJ. MR imaging for acute lower abdominal and pelvic pain. Radiographics. 2009;29:1781–1796.PubMedCrossRef Heverhagen JT, Klose KJ. MR imaging for acute lower abdominal and pelvic pain. Radiographics. 2009;29:1781–1796.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pines JM, Hollander JE, Isserman JA, et al. The association between physician risk tolerance and imaging among patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:552–557.PubMedCrossRef Pines JM, Hollander JE, Isserman JA, et al. The association between physician risk tolerance and imaging among patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:552–557.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utility of Repeated Abdominal CT Scans After Prior Negative CT Scans in Patients Presenting to ER with Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain
Authors
Borko Nojkov
Michael C. Duffy
Mitchell S. Cappell
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2473-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 4/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine