Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Original Article

Utility of Mayo Clinic’s early screen for discharge planning tool for predicting patient length of stay, discharge destination, and readmission risk in an inpatient oncology cohort

Authors: Caitlyn P. Socwell, Lucy Bucci, Sharni Patchell, Erika Kotowicz, Lara Edbrooke, Rodney Pope

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the feasibility of using the Mayo Clinic’s Early Screen for Discharge Planning (ESDP) tool in determining its predictive ability in an inpatient oncology hospital setting for variables including length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, and readmission risk.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted at a metropolitan tertiary cancer centre in Melbourne, Australia. The ESDP score, along with patient outcomes and characteristics, were collected to examine the relationships between positive and negative ESDP scores and patient outcomes.

Results

A total of 136 participants met inclusion criteria for this study. The proportion with positive ESDP scores was greater in those with unplanned hospital admissions compared with planned admissions (χ2(1, n = 136) = 3.94, p = 0.047). The ESDP status was not a significant predictor of oncology hospital LOS (rpb = 0.116, p = 0.178); however, the ESDP scores did predict discharge destination (χ2(2, n = 136) = 20.22, p < .001). Those re-admitted within 14 days were more likely to have negative ESDP scores than those not readmitted within this time period (χ2(1, n = 136) = 5.22, p = 0.022). Those with positive ESDP scores received a greater number of hospital services whilst admitted than those with negative scores (rpb = 0.388, p < .001) and were more likely to receive particular types of services.

Conclusion

The findings from this study suggest that the ESDP tool could be useful in an adult inpatient oncology population in a hospital with defined specialised hospital discharge planning services (SHDCPS). The ESDP may be beneficial for early identification of service types likely to be required in care and likely discharge destination, both of which can assist discharge planning (DP); however, the ESDP was not useful for predicting LOS or readmission risk in the adult inpatient oncology population without a SHDCPS model in place.
Literature
2.
go back to reference George S, Atwal A (2013) Discharge planning reduces length of stay and readmission rates for older people admitted with a medical condition. Aust Occup Ther J 60:375–376CrossRef George S, Atwal A (2013) Discharge planning reduces length of stay and readmission rates for older people admitted with a medical condition. Aust Occup Ther J 60:375–376CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McDonagh MS, Smith DH, Goddard M (2000) Measuring appropriate use of acute beds—a systematic review of methods and results. Health Policy 53:157–184CrossRef McDonagh MS, Smith DH, Goddard M (2000) Measuring appropriate use of acute beds—a systematic review of methods and results. Health Policy 53:157–184CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Frankl SE, Breeling JL, Goldman L (1991) Preventability of emergent hospital readmission. Am J Med 90:667–674CrossRef Frankl SE, Breeling JL, Goldman L (1991) Preventability of emergent hospital readmission. Am J Med 90:667–674CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Holland DE, Hemann MA (2011) Standardizing hospital discharge planning at the Mayo Clinic. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 37:29–36CrossRef Holland DE, Hemann MA (2011) Standardizing hospital discharge planning at the Mayo Clinic. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 37:29–36CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Guest R (2008) Evaluating public policy responses to the economic burden of population ageing with application to Australia. J Popul Res 25:99–118CrossRef Guest R (2008) Evaluating public policy responses to the economic burden of population ageing with application to Australia. J Popul Res 25:99–118CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Petra KR (2016) Poor discharge planning causes huge rise in adverse incidents. Nurs Stand 30:11–11 Petra KR (2016) Poor discharge planning causes huge rise in adverse incidents. Nurs Stand 30:11–11
11.
go back to reference Burgess JF, Hockenberry JM (2014) Can all cause readmission policy improve quality or lower expenditures? A historical perspective on current initiatives. Health Econ Policy Law 9:193–213CrossRef Burgess JF, Hockenberry JM (2014) Can all cause readmission policy improve quality or lower expenditures? A historical perspective on current initiatives. Health Econ Policy Law 9:193–213CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2016) Admitted patient care 2014–15: Australian hospital statistics. Health services no. 68. Cat. No. HSE 172. Canberra: AIWH Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2016) Admitted patient care 2014–15: Australian hospital statistics. Health services no. 68. Cat. No. HSE 172. Canberra: AIWH
13.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health & Welfare (2013) Health system expenditure on cancer and other neoplasms in Australia: 2008–09. Cancer series no. 81. Cat no. 78. Canberra: AIHW Australian Institute of Health & Welfare (2013) Health system expenditure on cancer and other neoplasms in Australia: 2008–09. Cancer series no. 81. Cat no. 78. Canberra: AIHW
15.
go back to reference Extermann M, Aapro M, Bernabei R, et al (2005) Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55:241–252 Extermann M, Aapro M, Bernabei R, et al (2005) Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55:241–252
16.
go back to reference Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Rubenstein LZ, Adams J (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342:1032–1036CrossRef Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Rubenstein LZ, Adams J (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342:1032–1036CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Holland DE, Harris MR, Leibson CL, Pankratz VS, Krichbaum KE (2006) Development and validation of a screen for specialized discharge planning services. Nurs Res 55:62–71CrossRef Holland DE, Harris MR, Leibson CL, Pankratz VS, Krichbaum KE (2006) Development and validation of a screen for specialized discharge planning services. Nurs Res 55:62–71CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pintova S, Holcombe RF, Blacksburg S, Friedlander P (2015) Impact of inpatient radiation on length of stay and health care costs. J Community Support Oncol 13:399–404CrossRef Pintova S, Holcombe RF, Blacksburg S, Friedlander P (2015) Impact of inpatient radiation on length of stay and health care costs. J Community Support Oncol 13:399–404CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kripalani S, Theobald CN, Anctil B, Vasilevskis EE (2014) Reducing hospital readmission: current strategies and future directions. Annu Rev Med 65:471–485CrossRef Kripalani S, Theobald CN, Anctil B, Vasilevskis EE (2014) Reducing hospital readmission: current strategies and future directions. Annu Rev Med 65:471–485CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utility of Mayo Clinic’s early screen for discharge planning tool for predicting patient length of stay, discharge destination, and readmission risk in an inpatient oncology cohort
Authors
Caitlyn P. Socwell
Lucy Bucci
Sharni Patchell
Erika Kotowicz
Lara Edbrooke
Rodney Pope
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4252-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine