Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 5/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Paper

Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones

Authors: Lene Hyldgaard Bigum, Peter Sommer Ulriksen, Omar Salah Omar

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

This study describes and evaluates the use of non-contrast enhanced computerized tomography (NCCT) before and after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Computer measured stone volume was used as an exact measurement for treatment response. 81 patients received SWL of kidney stones at Herlev Hospital between April 2013 and January 2014 and follow-up was possible in 77 (95 %) patients. NCCT was used before and after treatment. Treatment response was expressed as a reduction of the stone volume. Stone characteristics as the stone volumes, HU, SSD and localization were measured by radiologist using a vendor non-specific computer program. Complications, patient characteristics and additional treatment were registered. On average, 5858 shocks were given each patient. The follow-up NCCT was performed 24 days after treatment. It was possible to calculate the stone volume in 88 % of the patients—the remaining 12 % it was not possible due to stone disintegration. The stone free rate was 22 %. The average relative reduction in stone burden was 62 %. Only 8 % of the patients were radiological non-responders. Steinstrasse was observed in 13 (17 %) and 28 (36 %) patients had additional treatment performed. Irradiation dose per NCCT was 2.6 mSv. Stone volume could be calculated in most patients. The relative reduction in stone burden after treatment was 62 %. The stone volume was redundant when evaluating stone free patients, but in cases of partial response it gave an exact quantification, to be used in the further management and follow-up of the patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G (2008) Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):396–401CrossRefPubMed Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G (2008) Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):396–401CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M (2014) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD007044. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3 PubMed Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M (2014) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD007044. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD007044.​pub3 PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ozturk U, Sener NC, Goktug HN, Nalbant I, Gucuk A, Imamoglu MA (2013) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10–20 mm. Urol Int. 91(3):345–349. doi:10.1159/000351136 [Epub 2013 Jun 28] CrossRefPubMed Ozturk U, Sener NC, Goktug HN, Nalbant I, Gucuk A, Imamoglu MA (2013) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10–20 mm. Urol Int. 91(3):345–349. doi:10.​1159/​000351136 [Epub 2013 Jun 28] CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lee HY, Yang YH, Lee YL, Shen JT, Jang MY, Shih PM, Wu WJ, Chou YH, Juan YS (2015) Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy. Clin Imaging. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.010 [Epub ahead of print] Lee HY, Yang YH, Lee YL, Shen JT, Jang MY, Shih PM, Wu WJ, Chou YH, Juan YS (2015) Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy. Clin Imaging. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clinimag.​2015.​04.​010 [Epub ahead of print]
5.
go back to reference Deters LA, Jumper CM, Steinberg PL, Pais VM Jr (2011) Evaluating the definition of “stone free status” in contemporary urologic literature. Clin Nephrol 76(5):354–357CrossRefPubMed Deters LA, Jumper CM, Steinberg PL, Pais VM Jr (2011) Evaluating the definition of “stone free status” in contemporary urologic literature. Clin Nephrol 76(5):354–357CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Küpeli B, Gürocak S, Tunç L, Senocak C, Karaoğlan U, Bozkirli I (2005) Value of ultrasonography and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of stone-free patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (USG and helical CT after SWL). Int Urol Nephrol 37(2):225–230CrossRefPubMed Küpeli B, Gürocak S, Tunç L, Senocak C, Karaoğlan U, Bozkirli I (2005) Value of ultrasonography and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of stone-free patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (USG and helical CT after SWL). Int Urol Nephrol 37(2):225–230CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Finch W, Johnston R, Shaida N, Winterbottom A, Wiseman O (2014) Measuring stone volume—three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula? BJU Int. 113(4):610–614 [Epub 2014 Jan 15] CrossRefPubMed Finch W, Johnston R, Shaida N, Winterbottom A, Wiseman O (2014) Measuring stone volume—three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula? BJU Int. 113(4):610–614 [Epub 2014 Jan 15] CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Geleijns J (2007) Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):581–591CrossRefPubMed Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Geleijns J (2007) Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):581–591CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cicerello E, Merlo F, Maccatrozzo L (2012) Management of clinically insignificant residual fragments following shock wave lithotripsy. Adv Urol 2012:320104. doi:10.1155/2012/320104. PMCID: PMC3371344 Cicerello E, Merlo F, Maccatrozzo L (2012) Management of clinically insignificant residual fragments following shock wave lithotripsy. Adv Urol 2012:320104. doi:10.​1155/​2012/​320104. PMCID: PMC3371344
11.
12.
go back to reference Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K et al (2001) The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi. J Urol 166(6):2081–2085CrossRefPubMed Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K et al (2001) The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi. J Urol 166(6):2081–2085CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Turna B, Ekren F, Nazli O et al (2007) Comparative results of shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices. J Endourol 21(9):951–956CrossRefPubMed Turna B, Ekren F, Nazli O et al (2007) Comparative results of shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices. J Endourol 21(9):951–956CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sozen S, Kupeli B, Acar C, Gurocak S, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli I (2008) Significance of lower-pole pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy in nonobstructive isolated renal pelvic stones. J Endourol 22(5):877–881CrossRefPubMed Sozen S, Kupeli B, Acar C, Gurocak S, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli I (2008) Significance of lower-pole pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy in nonobstructive isolated renal pelvic stones. J Endourol 22(5):877–881CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Khalil MM (2012) Which is more important in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of solitary renal stones: stone location or stone burden? J Endourol 26(5):535–539. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0314 [Epub 2011 Nov 21] CrossRefPubMed Khalil MM (2012) Which is more important in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of solitary renal stones: stone location or stone burden? J Endourol 26(5):535–539. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2011.​0314 [Epub 2011 Nov 21] CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Viprakasit DP, Sawyer MD, Herrell SD, Miller NL (2012) Limitations of ultrasonography in the evaluation of urolithiasis: a correlation with computed tomography. J Endourol 26(3):209–213. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0177 [Epub 2011 Oct 19] CrossRefPubMed Viprakasit DP, Sawyer MD, Herrell SD, Miller NL (2012) Limitations of ultrasonography in the evaluation of urolithiasis: a correlation with computed tomography. J Endourol 26(3):209–213. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2011.​0177 [Epub 2011 Oct 19] CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hur J, Park SB, Lee JB, Park HJ, Chang IH, Kwon JK, Kim YS (2015) CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: image quality of ultralow-dose (Sub mSv) CT with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction and diagnostic performance of low-dose CT with statistical iterative reconstruction. Abdom Imaging 40(7):2432–2440. doi:10.1007/s00261-015-0411-2 CrossRefPubMed Hur J, Park SB, Lee JB, Park HJ, Chang IH, Kwon JK, Kim YS (2015) CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: image quality of ultralow-dose (Sub mSv) CT with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction and diagnostic performance of low-dose CT with statistical iterative reconstruction. Abdom Imaging 40(7):2432–2440. doi:10.​1007/​s00261-015-0411-2 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sahin C, Kafkasli A, Cetinel CA, Narter F, Saglam E, Sarica K (2015) How do the residual fragments after SWL affect the health-related quality of life? A critical analysis in a size-based manner. Urolithiasis 43(2):163–170. doi:10.1007/s00240-014-0727-3 [Epub 2014 Oct 2] CrossRefPubMed Sahin C, Kafkasli A, Cetinel CA, Narter F, Saglam E, Sarica K (2015) How do the residual fragments after SWL affect the health-related quality of life? A critical analysis in a size-based manner. Urolithiasis 43(2):163–170. doi:10.​1007/​s00240-014-0727-3 [Epub 2014 Oct 2] CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bhojani N, Mandeville JA, Hameed TA, Soergel TM, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Krambeck AE, Lingeman JE (2015) Lithotripter outcomes in a community practice setting: comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Urol 193(3):875–879. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.117 [Epub 2014 Oct 8] CrossRefPubMed Bhojani N, Mandeville JA, Hameed TA, Soergel TM, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Krambeck AE, Lingeman JE (2015) Lithotripter outcomes in a community practice setting: comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Urol 193(3):875–879. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2014.​09.​117 [Epub 2014 Oct 8] CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Selby MG, Vrtiska TJ, Krambeck AE, McCollough CH, Elsherbiny HE, Bergstralh EJ, Lieske JC, Rule AD (2015) Quantification of asymptomatic kidney stone burden by computed tomography for predicting future symptomatic stone events. Urology 85(1):45–50. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.031 [Epub 2014 Oct 22] CrossRefPubMed Selby MG, Vrtiska TJ, Krambeck AE, McCollough CH, Elsherbiny HE, Bergstralh EJ, Lieske JC, Rule AD (2015) Quantification of asymptomatic kidney stone burden by computed tomography for predicting future symptomatic stone events. Urology 85(1):45–50. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2014.​08.​031 [Epub 2014 Oct 22] CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones
Authors
Lene Hyldgaard Bigum
Peter Sommer Ulriksen
Omar Salah Omar
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0864-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Urolithiasis 5/2016 Go to the issue